Monthly Archives: March 2018

Ethereum Seeks Footing at Lower Levels

On February 16, 2018, we said the following of Ethereum:

“Failure of the price of Ethereum to achieve the $1,040.05 by a substantial amount ($1,111 or more) would be an indication that the price will retest the $695.08 level.  A retest of the $695.08 level without falling below the level would be constructive for a new bull market. It would be a second failure to decline below the $692.99 level.  According to Dow Theory, this would one of the most constructive bullish indications going forward. Alternatively, if Ethereum fell below $692.99 then the expectation is that $617.09 is the minimum downside target.”

Unfortunately, Ethereum did not managed to exceed the $1,040.05 level.  In addition to achieving the $695.08 level, Ethereum has fallen below the conservative downside target of $617.09, as mentioned in our February 5, 2018 posting. 

Continue reading

Rates Up, Utilities Down? Nope!

In a Bloomberg article dated March 14, 2018, it cites a prevailing theme about utilities and interest rates.

“The popular ‘buy banks, sell utility stocks’ strategy, built in anticipation of higher interest rates, is unraveling.

“Utilities were the only gainers in the S&P 500 Index on Wednesday, with the industry that’s seen hurt most by rising Treasury yields heading for its longest rally since November. Financial shares, beneficiaries of higher borrowing costs, sank 1.4 percent for a third day of declines.”

image

While this is a small timeframe to measure the performance of any industry, it does shed some light on the popular interpretations about what a rising interest rate cycle will bring to the market.  One of the most pervasive claims is the interest rate sensitive utilities will suffer with the advent of rising interest rates.

As pointed out in our September 4, 2014 article titled “Utility Stocks and Rising Interest Rates”, we said the following:

“Investors anticipating a general rise in interest rates should feel some comfort in knowing that most manager in the utility sector are ready for what is to come.  Rising interest rates are not an automatic death sentence for utility stock prices or earnings.   In fact, the early stages of rising interest rates may see utility stocks match or exceed the returns of non-interest rate sensitive stocks, on a total return basis.  Only when the outlook is cloudy will it become difficult to offer projections that are in line with prior expectations.”

So far the market is in agreement with our long established thesis that utilities do well in the early stages of the secular rise in interest rates.

Continue reading

Gold and the DJIA

Charles H. Dow, co-founder of the Wall Street Journal, once said:

For the past 25 years the commodity market and the stock market have moved almost exactly together. The index number representing many commodities rose from 88 in 1878 to 120 in 1881. It dropped back to 90 in 1885, rose to 95 in 1891, dropped back to 73 in 1896, and recovered to 90 in 1900. Furthermore, index numbers kept in Europe and applied to quite different commodities had almost exactly the same movement in the same time. It is not necessary to say to anyone familiar with the course of the stock market that this has been exactly the course of stocks in the same period ( source: Dow, Charles. Review and Outlook. Wall Street Journal.February 21, 1901.)”

There is no exactness between the relative percentage change in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the price of a commodity like gold.  However, since the January 26, 2018 peak in the DJIA, there has been a lot of sympathy moves in the price of gold and the DJIA.

image

Shanghai Index: Does Stimulus Work?

In past articles, we have pointed to the fact that government stimulus directed at the economy or the stock market has little effect (2016, 2014, 2011, 2009).  So it is with little wonder that we look at the situation of the Shanghai Composite Index for indications of the effectiveness of direct stock market intervention by the Chinese government.

On June 27, 2015, after the Shanghai Index had declined more than –20%, the government stepped in to shore up the stock market with a surprise interest rate cut.  That rate cut and many other actions that followed was cause for many analysts to carry on with the superstitious belief that government intervention could stop stock market declines and actually boost the market.  Many analysts were openly recommending Chinese stocks since the government had openly declared a goal to stop the stock market decline.

The following is a list of known interventions that was presented by Quartz Media writers Heather Timmons and Lily Kuo published on July 28, 2015 in an article titled “A complete list of the Chinese government’s stock-market stimulus”:

    • June 27: A surprise 25 basis point interest rate cut and lowering of the reserves banks need to keep when they lend to companies.
    • June 29: Regulators say pension funds can invest 30% of their net assets (equivalent to more than $100 billion) in equities for the first time.
    • July 1: China’s securities regulator relaxes rules on margin financing, or trading stocks with borrowed money.
    • July 3: China’s central bank extends a 250 billion RMB ($40 billion), six-month loan to state owned banks to “encourage banks to increase support” to weak parts of the economy.
    • July 4: 21 brokerages, led by Citic Securities, say they will invest $19.3 billion in a new blue-chip fund to stabilize the market, and vow not to sell any of their own proprietary equity holdings.
    • July 5: 28 firms planning IPOs on the Shanghai and Shenzhen market say they will postpone them and start refunding investors’ capital.
    • July 5: China’s central bank says it will inject an undisclosed amount of capital into China Securities Finance Corp (CSF), a state-owned company that makes margin loans to brokers.
    • July 6: Executives from mutual funds pledge to support the markets with their own capital.
    • July 8: Regulators banned company shareholders with stakes of more than 5% from selling for the next six months. China’s central bank said it would further support the margin lending provider CSF through interbank lending, bond issuance, and collateral backed financing and re-lending. China’s securities regulator also said it would increase purchases of small-cap stocks.
    • July 9: China’s banking regulator, the CBRC, said banks can now loan money to companies using stock as collateral, and ease margin requirements for wealth management customers.
    • July 9: China Development Bank and the Export-Import Bank of China said they would not sell shares, and look to buy more stock.
    • July 27: Margin lending provider CSF will continue to buy stocks to stabilize the market, and China’s stock market regulator, the CSRC, will investigate “huge stock sell-offs,” the CSRC said.

Since the initiation of these government actions to prop up the stock market, the Shanghai Composite Index declined an additional –34.40% to the low of January 28, 2016 and three years later lingers at a loss of –18.40% based on the starting point of the market stimulus of June 27, 2015.  In total, the Shanghai Index is down –35.98% from the peak on June 12, 2015.

image

We cannot emphasis enough how government stimulus has marginal long-term impact on the direction of the stock market and the economy.  Interestingly, buyers of Chinese ETFs at the current levels would be considered value investors as opposed to those buying in 2015 based on government promises to prop the market.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: March 2, 2018

Top Five Watch List Performance Review

In our ongoing review of the NLO Dividend Watch List, we have taken the top five stocks on our list from March 3, 2017 and have checked the performance one year later. The top five companies on that list can be seen in the table below.

Symbol Name 2015 Price 2016 Price % change
TGT Target Corp. 57.35 75.15 31.0%
CATO Cato Corp. 23.65 11.82 -50.0%
MAC Macerich 66.57 59.04 -11.3%
SKT Tanger Factory Outlet Centers 33.34 22.70 -31.9%
WRI Weingarten Realty Investors 34.73 27.60 -20.5%
      Average -16.5%
         
DJI Dow Jones Industrial 21,005.71 24,538.06 16.8%
SPX S&P 500 2,383.12 2,691.25 12.9%

The top five companies on our list didn't fare as well as the market. The combined loss was 16.5% while the S&P 500 gained 12.9%. The only company with a positive gain was Target (TGT). If we look at the sector breakdown of these companies, one will identify a clear trend of sector performance. Three of these five companies below in REIT sectors and the average loss were 21.3%. Cato (CATO) which is a specialty retail store lost half of its market value in one year. Our team were bullish on Target but were early in our purchases. Shares rose more than 30% since last year which is almost 2x the return from the market.

The other company mentioned last year was VF Corp (VFC). Our team was bullish on shares at the right moment and walk away from with a profitable trade. Since our list last year, VF Corp shares rose 40%.

U.S. Dividend Watch List: March 2, 2018

The volatility trade is back on and the market continued to swing wildly. At the end of the week, the market lost 2% and the Dow Jones Industrial average broke below 25,000 mark. The result of this pull back is more companies are approaching the yearly low leading to more companies on our dividend list. Should one choose to utilize this pullback as an entry point, we urge our reader to start with high quality companies which have consistent dividend payments listed below. Continue reading

Tariffs: Not a Black Swan

Recent discussion of a trade war breaking out has left the financial press and popular analysts calling for a potential “black swan” in the financial markets. 

image

What’s the problem? There is no such thing as an event that is currently being predicted that could possibly be a “black swan” event.

Continue reading

Performance Review: March 5, 2010

Below is the 8-year & 1-year total return performance of our Dividend Watch List from March 5, 2010 as compared to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  Included with the performance review is a look at a viable and consistent alternative to the simple “buy the top 10” or “buy the top three” stocks in the list.

DJIA: The Weakest Link

If the saying that “you’re only as good as your weakest link” is true then investors need to pay attention to General Electric (GE).  In the price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), GE has 0.38% of an impact on the DJIA.  Such a low impact on the index makes the movement of GE on the index almost non-existent.  However, the manner in which this ailment in the index is treated says a lot about the overall market.

Leaving aside the fact that General Electric has been in the Dow Jones Industrial Average since 1907, GE is the new, “As General Motors goes, so goes the nation.”  It isn’t that GE is as broadly diversified in domestic manufacturing that is the issue, though it broadly impacts many industries, instead, it is the continued share decline and the impact on pensions, insurance, 401k, retirement plans, and bank funds that are being adversely affected by cross shareholding of GE as it has declined into what appears to be oblivion.

The current environment affecting GE reminds us of the spiraling feedback loop of cross-shareholding (zaibatsu) in the Japanese stock market from 1989 to the present.  The fact that a clean cut could not be made with badly managed companies due to stock holding relationships only allowed the deferral of addressing the real problems within the market.  what was the impact of cross-shareholding on the Nikkei stock index in Japan?

image

By all accounts, the decline in the Nikkei of –81.87% was due primarily because of the difficulty of disengaging the tangled web of cross-shareholding relationships.  Ultimately, improved prospects of Japanese companies came in the form of divesting cross-shareholdings.

In our opinion, the situation is the same with General Electric.  The managers of the Dow Jones Industrial Average have allowed the disparity between the top weighted Dow component (Boeing) to go far beyond the norm of the bottom component (General Electric), typically 10 times (before getting kicked out of the index) but now it is more than 24 times the value of GE.

image

Had GE been removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average at 10x the value of the highest priced stock in the index (Boeing), GE would have been removed from the index in late August 2017.  The fact that GE has been allowed to remain in the index means that the managers of the DJIA are in denial of the problems at GE or are acting at the behest of fund managers hoping for a turnaround before dumping their shares.

Right now, the weakest link in the DJIA is allowed to stay afloat at the expense of millions of retirement funds who are required to hold “blue chip” stocks regardless of performance.  GE cannot claim to be “blue chip” especially if it gets booted from the DJIA.  Although, the accounting scandals and restatements since the Jack Welch era should have been the first indication that GE wasn’t a “blue chip” stock.

The cascading negative effect of not booting GE from the DJIA is far worse than the impact of kicking it to the curb.