Author Archives: NLObserver Team

Congrats to Regan

The winner of our reader appreciation day book giveaway is Regan Cheng of Cupertino, California. The book Dow Theory Unplugged: Charles Dow's Original Editorials and Their Relevance Today has been receive in a town most famous for its largest company Apple Inc. Thanks to everyone who continues to read our site. We hope to entertain and possibly enlighten on matters related to the economy and the stock market.

Best Regards,

Touc and Art

Dividend Watch List

Watch List Summary
The best performing stock from the previous list was Harleysville (HGIC) which rose 4% The worst performing stock was Medtronic (MDT) which fell 14%.

Topping the list this week is Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Based on IQTrends (http://www.iqtrends.com/), JNJ is undervalued at or near 3.5% yield. The current yield is 3.7%. Trailing P/E of 12 is 25% below its average 5 years P/E of 16. We suggest readers adding JNJ to your investment watch list.

Second on the list is Intel (INTC). After cutting their sales and margin forecast down on Friday, stock rose 1%. Could the negative news be priced in? Only time will tell. Intel is trading at 11x trailing earnings. Compared that to its 5 years average of 21x, it could be a bargain. Analyst will have a weekend full of downward revision so we expect little more pressure next week. But given the stock is yielding 3.4% compared to the 5 years average yield of 2.3%, the risk/reward is more attractive now. Both JNJ and INTC have payout ratio below 50%.

Our Investment Observation of Wesco Financial (WSC) on Tuesday August 24th was quickly verifed as being undervalued by Warren Buffett's offer to buy the remaining portion that he didn't already own on Thursday August 26th. We were able to provide a new Investment Observation of Transatlantic Holdings (TRH). With Transatlantic Holdings selling below book value, median price-to-earnings and dividend increases every year since going public, we believe TRH is a great alternative to Wesco Financial. In addition to TRH, we are working on a company which we believe will be able to retain its value far into the future.

August 27, 2010 Watch List

Symbol Name Price % Yr Low P/E EPS (ttm) Div/Shr Yield Payout Ratio
JNJ Johnson & Johnson   57.60 1.30% 11.90 4.84 2.16 3.75% 45%
INTC Intel Corp.  18.37 1.38% 11.00 1.67 0.63 3.43% 38%
GD General Dynamics Corp. 57.37 1.95% 9.18 6.25 1.68 2.93% 27%
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc   19.61 2.14% 11.88 1.65 1.46 7.45% 88%
SVU SUPERVALU INC 10.19 2.31% 6.25 1.63 0.35 3.43% 21%
HRB H&R Block, Inc. 13.59 2.64% 9.50 1.43 0.60 4.42% 42%
CSL Carlisle Companies Inc. 29.50 2.68% 12.66 2.33 0.68 2.31% 29%
UVV Universal Corp. 36.47 2.70% 7.18 5.08 1.88 5.15% 37%
XRAY DENTSPLY International Inc.  28.86 2.70% 15.60 1.85 0.20 0.69% 11%
WFSL Washington Federal, Inc.  14.43 2.78% 13.74 1.05 0.20 1.39% 19%
DNB Dun & Bradstreet Corp. 67.37 2.85% 14.49 4.65 1.40 2.08% 30%
UMBF UMB Financial Corp.  33.48 2.86% 13.95 2.40 0.74 2.21% 31%
PAYX Paychex, Inc.  25.37 2.92% 19.22 1.32 1.24 4.89% 94%
BEC Beckman Coulter, Inc. 45.84 3.24% 21.83 2.10 0.72 1.57% 34%
HSC Harsco Corp. 20.74 3.49% 17.14 1.21 0.82 3.95% 68%
ALL Allstate Corp.   27.99 3.51% 15.13 1.85 0.80 2.86% 43%
NTRS Northern Trust Corp.  47.05 3.52% 15.43 3.05 1.12 2.38% 37%
EV Eaton Vance Corp. 26.93 3.74% 19.24 1.40 0.64 2.38% 46%
ITW Illinois Tool Works, Inc. 41.85 3.77% 13.86 3.02 1.36 3.25% 45%
NFG National Fuel Gas Co. 44.46 3.81% 17.03 2.61 1.38 3.10% 53%
WAG Walgreen Co. 27.32 4.04% 13.13 2.08 0.70 2.56% 34%
WFC Wells Fargo & Co. 24.00 4.26% 14.46 1.66 0.20 0.83% 12%
BBT BB&T Corp. 22.72 4.51% 21.43 1.06 0.60 2.64% 57%
OMI Owens & Minor, Inc. 26.68 4.55% 13.54 1.97 0.71 2.66% 36%
FRS Frisch's Restaurants, Inc 18.92 4.59% 9.80 1.93 0.52 2.75% 27%
CWT California Water Service Group 35.42 4.76% 19.15 1.85 1.19 3.36% 64%
WST West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 34.33 4.82% 14.99 2.29 0.64 1.86% 28%
MLM Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 75.16 5.12% 41.76 1.80 1.60 2.13% 89%
USB U.S. BanCorp. 21.66 5.15% 15.58 1.39 0.20 0.92% 14%
MSA Mine Safety Appliances Co 23.57 5.22% 21.04 1.12 1.00 4.24% 89%
BANF BancFirst Corp.  36.49 5.28% 14.42 2.53 0.92 2.52% 36%
FFIN First Financial Bankshares, Inc.  45.85 5.28% 17.57 2.61 1.36 2.97% 52%
BDX Becton, Dickinson and Co. 69.72 5.32% 13.64 5.11 1.48 2.12% 29%
BCR CR Bard, Inc. 77.98 5.39% 15.88 4.91 0.72 0.92% 15%
CL Colgate-Palmolive Co. 74.25 5.39% 17.72 4.19 2.12 2.86% 51%
MDT Medtronic, Inc. 32.52 5.58% 11.66 2.79 0.90 2.77% 32%
FII Federated Investors Inc 21.13 5.60% 11.06 1.91 0.96 4.54% 50%
FUL HB Fuller Company 19.61 6.17% 10.77 1.82 0.28 1.43% 15%
TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.  45.24 6.37% 20.20 2.24 1.08 2.39% 48%
TR Tootsie Roll Industries Inc  23.97 3.45% 26.34 0.91 0.32 1.34% 35%
WMT Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 51.00 6.76% 13.11 3.89 1.21 2.37% 31%
LLY Eli Lilly & Co. 34.20 6.81% 8.47 4.04 1.96 5.73% 49%
XOM Exxon Mobil Corp.   59.80 6.90% 11.54 5.18 1.76 2.94% 34%
HGIC Harleysville Group Inc.  32.13 6.92% 12.12 2.65 1.44 4.48% 54%
UFPI Universal Forest Products, Inc.  28.18 7.15% 22.91 1.23 0.40 1.42% 33%
SBSI Southside Bancshares, Inc.  18.65 7.24% 7.06 2.64 0.68 3.65% 26%
HCC HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. 25.59 7.30% 8.79 2.91 0.54 2.11% 19%
SEIC SEI Investments Company  18.02 7.52% 16.38 1.10 0.20 1.11% 18%
LM Legg Mason, Inc.  25.84 7.67% 20.35 1.27 0.16 0.62% 13%
HIG Hartford Financial Services Group  20.32 7.74% 70.07 0.29 0.20 0.98% 69%
RLI RLI Corp. 53.21 7.87% 9.47 5.62 1.16 2.18% 21%
SYK Stryker Corp. 44.00 7.90% 14.97 2.94 0.60 1.36% 20%
GS Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.   139.75 7.92% 7.05 19.82 1.40 1.00% 7%
AROW Arrow Financial Corp.  23.70 8.07% 12.22 1.94 1.00 4.22% 52%
CBSH Commerce Bancshares, Inc.  36.56 8.20% 14.86 2.46 0.94 2.57% 38%
IBM International Business Machines 124.73 8.32% 11.79 10.58 2.60 2.08% 25%
SFNC Simmons First National Corp.  26.29 8.73% 15.37 1.71 0.76 2.89% 44%
BRC Brady Corp. 26.34 8.75% 17.44 1.51 0.70 2.66% 46%
AWR American States Water Co. 33.94 8.78% 20.82 1.63 1.04 3.06% 64%
LEG Leggett & Platt, Inc. 19.48 8.89% 16.23 1.20 1.08 5.54% 90%
VFC VF Corp. 73.88 9.02% 14.75 5.01 2.40 3.25% 48%
TRMK Trustmark Corp.  19.74 9.24% 14.10 1.40 0.92 4.66% 66%
EGN Energen Corp. 43.97 9.24% 11.39 3.86 0.52 1.18% 13%
LANC Lancaster Colony Corp.  47.35 9.40% 11.61 4.08 1.20 2.53% 29%
TMP Tompkins Financial Corp. 37.94 9.51% 12.01 3.16 1.36 3.58% 43%
RNST Renasant Corp.  14.07 9.84% 19.01 0.74 0.68 4.83% 92%
TRH Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. 48.52 10.07% 7.73 6.28 0.84 1.73% 13%
CAG ConAgra Foods, Inc. 21.74 10.13% 13.42 1.62 0.80 3.68% 49%
MDU MDU Resources Group Inc. 18.85 10.17% 13.86 1.36 0.63 3.34% 46%
LOW Lowe's Companies Inc 21.10 10.18% 16.48 1.28 0.44 2.09% 34%
FFIC Flushing Financial Corp.  11.21 10.23% 11.56 0.97 0.52 4.64% 54%
RPM RPM International Inc. 17.25 10.15% 12.41 1.39 0.82 4.75% 59%
72 Companies








We excluded companies that has no earning and payout ratio in excess of 100%. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and extensive due diligence.

Because our list has many great companies, we urged investors to filter for companies with less than 50% payout ratio. This should minimized the risk of dividend reductions if earnings are to fall by half. If you understand the companies' history and their ability to pay the dividend, then payout ratios in excess of 50% may be considered.  We suggest readers to use the March 2009 low (or companies' most distressed level in the last 2 years) as the downside projection for investing. Our view is to embrace the worse case scenario prior to investing. The November 2008 to March 2009 time frame fits that description. It is important to place these companies in your own watch list so that when the opportunity arises, you can purchase them with a greater margin of safety.

Email our team here.

September Ex-Dividend Dates for Watch List Companies

Below are the ex-dividend dates for the month of September for companies that appear on our Dividend Achiever, Nasdaq 100, Dow Jones Transportation Index and International Dividend Achiever Watch Lists. All companies are ranked by ex-dividend dates.  This is a full update of the same list from July 31, 2010.

Companies that show up on our Watch Lists could be considered the equivalent of the bargain bin of high quality blue chip stocks. Because these companies have increased their dividends every year for at least 10 years in a row or are part of the Nasdaq 100 and within 20% of their respective 52-week low, you know that you’re not overpaying for a company that has demonstrated profitability and the ability to rebound from challenging times.

Symbol Company Price % above low Yield Ex-date
MYE Myers Industries, Inc. $6.40 1.59% 3.90% 9/1/2010
ANAT American National Insurance $77.00 1.77% 4.00% 9/1/2010
BAC Bank of America Corp $12.64 1.85% 0.30% 9/1/2010
IMO Imperial Oil Limited $37.25 6.28% 1.10% 9/1/2010
TRH Transatlantic Holdings $48.52 10.07% 1.70% 9/1/2010
SU Suncor Energy $31.10 12.48% 1.20% 9/1/2010
PEP Pepsico, Inc. $64.12 15.14% 3.00% 9/1/2010
CCBG Capital City Bank Group $11.43 6.23% 3.60% 9/1/2010
WRI Weingarten Realty Investors $20.31 15.07% 5.20% 9/3/2010
BDX Becton, Dickinson $69.72 5.32% 2.10% 9/7/2010
CBSH Commerce Bancshares $36.56 8.20% 2.60% 9/7/2010
MDU MDU Resources Group $18.85 10.17% 3.40% 9/7/2010
FFIC Flushing Financial $11.21 10.23% 4.60% 9/7/2010
UVSP Univest Corporation of Penn $16.78 10.83% 4.90% 9/7/2010
UMBF UMB Financial Corp $33.48 2.86% 2.20% 9/8/2010
HRB H&R Block, Inc. $13.59 3.03% 4.50% 9/8/2010
NTRS Northern Trust Corp $47.05 3.52% 2.40% 9/8/2010
VFC V.F. Corp $73.88 9.02% 3.20% 9/8/2010
LANC Lancaster Colony Corp $47.35 9.40% 2.60% 9/8/2010
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corp $64.46 12.89% 4.10% 9/8/2010
JCI Johnson Controls, Inc $27.24 15.47% 1.90% 9/8/2010
STFC State Auto Financial Corp $14.05 4.85% 4.30% 9/8/2010
TROW T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. $45.24 6.37% 2.40% 9/8/2010
SUBK Suffolk Bancorp $24.34 3.00% 3.60% 9/9/2010
IRET Investors Real Estate Trust $8.24 3.39% 8.30% 9/9/2010
FFIN First Financial Bankshares, Inc $45.85 5.28% 3.00% 9/9/2010
SFNC Simmons First National Corp $26.29 8.73% 3.00% 9/9/2010
THFF First Financial Corp $28.21 12.30% 3.30% 9/9/2010
FSS Federal Signal Corp $5.13 4.48% 4.70% 9/10/2010
UHT Universal Health Realty Income $32.25 9.25% 7.60% 9/12/2010
HI Hillenbrand Inc $19.99 12.30% 3.70% 9/12/2010
TDS Telephone and Data Systems $30.77 19.68% 1.50% 9/12/2010
BXS BancorpSouth, Inc. $12.86 3.63% 6.90% 9/13/2010
OMI Owens & Minor, Inc. $26.68 4.55% 2.70% 9/13/2010
HGIC Harleysville Group Inc. $32.13 6.92% 4.60% 9/13/2010
GMT GATX Corp $27.39 7.83% 4.20% 9/13/2010
LEG Leggett & Platt, Inc $19.48 8.89% 5.60% 9/13/2010
NJR NewJersey Resources Corp $38.00 13.47% 3.70% 9/13/2010
RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. $57.52 13.99% 1.70% 9/13/2010
KO Coca-Cola Co $56.16 16.08% 3.20% 9/13/2010
MRK Merck & Company, Inc. $35.00 16.90% 4.40% 9/13/2010
UGI UGI Corp $27.53 18.77% 3.60% 9/13/2010
CTBI Community Trust Bancorp $26.46 19.46% 4.70% 9/13/2010
TSS Total System Services $14.55 8.50% 2.00% 9/13/2010
RNST Renasant Corp $14.07 9.84% 5.00% 9/13/2010
NGG National Grid Transco $42.89 16.80% 8.50% 9/13/2010
FDX FedEx Corp $80.46 18.22% 0.60% 9/13/2010
MCY Mercury General Corp $39.27 10.84% 6.10% 9/14/2010
FNF Fidelity National Financial $14.70 16.67% 4.90% 9/14/2010
EGP EastGroup Properties, Inc. $35.07 5.92% 5.90% 9/14/2010
FRS Frisch's Restaurants, Inc. $18.92 4.59% 2.70% 9/15/2010
GE General Electric $14.71 12.89% 3.30% 9/16/2010
ECL Ecolab Inc. $47.62 17.12% 1.30% 9/17/2010
SEIC SEI Investments $18.02 7.52% 1.10% 9/19/2010
TMX Telefonos de Mexico $14.06 8.15% 5.50% 9/20/2010
CINF Cincinnati Financial $27.22 11.06% 5.90% 9/20/2010
TR Tootsie Roll Industries $23.97 3.45% 1.30% 9/20/2010
SPLS Staples, Inc. $18.04 2.21% 2.00% 9/21/2010
OSBC Old Second Bancorp, Inc. $0.89 8.59% 4.30% 9/21/2010
CB Chubb Corporation $54.48 15.67% 2.70% 9/21/2010
CCH COCA COLA HELLENIC $23.02 16.56% 1.50% 9/21/2010
NFG National Fuel Gas Co $44.46 3.81% 3.20% 9/26/2010
CVBF CVB Financial Corp $6.88 4.08% 4.70% 9/26/2010
NUE Nucor Corp $37.25 4.31% 3.90% 9/26/2010
USB U.S. Bancorp $21.66 5.15% 0.90% 9/26/2010
BANF BancFirst Corp $36.49 5.28% 2.60% 9/26/2010
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc. $13.83 7.31% 2.20% 9/26/2010
SYK Stryker Corp $44.00 7.90% 1.40% 9/26/2010
FBNC First Bancorp $12.94 8.38% 2.50% 9/26/2010
AXS Axis Capital Holdings Limited $31.28 14.92% 2.70% 9/26/2010
OFC Corporate Office Properties $36.54 15.01% 4.30% 9/26/2010
WPC W.P. Carey  Co. LLC $28.42 15.11% 7.10% 9/26/2010
BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. $98.32 17.05% 0.90% 9/26/2010
XRAY DENTSPLY Intl Inc. $28.86 2.70% 0.70% 9/27/2010
SRE Sempra Energy $51.97 18.36% 3.00% 9/27/2010
CWCO Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. $9.71 4.75% 3.10% 9/27/2010
HCC HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. Co $25.59 7.30% 2.10% 9/27/2010
STT State Street Corp $35.85 10.41% 0.10% 9/27/2010
LRY Liberty Property Trust $30.29 11.44% 6.40% 9/27/2010
ABM ABM Industries Inc $20.24 12.82% 2.80% 9/27/2010
APD Air Products and Chemicals, Inc $74.42 16.05% 2.70% 9/27/2010
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc. $41.85 3.77% 3.30% 9/28/2010
RLI RLI Corp $53.21 7.87% 2.20% 9/28/2010
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co $25.33 15.77% 5.20% 9/28/2010
WSH Willis Group Holdings $29.39 17.70% 3.60% 9/28/2010
CCJ Cameco Corp $24.69 19.28% 1.10% 9/28/2010
SYY Sysco Corp $28.05 15.72% 3.50% 9/28/2010
WWW Wolverine World Wide $26.22 11.53% 1.70% 9/29/2010
ACE Ace Limited $54.34 15.40% 2.50% 9/29/2010
SUP Superior Industries Intl $14.95 19.12% 4.30% 9/29/2010

If you happen to be researching these companies for potential investment, it would be advisable to consider the ex-dividend date prior to possible purchases. Owning the shares of the company that you're interested in before the ex-dividend date entitles you to the upcoming dividend payment.
Owning the shares on or after the ex-dividend date means that you would have to wait at least three months before receipt of the next dividend payment. Please verify the ex-dividend date and payout ratio before committing funds to these stocks. Additionally, do not base your next long or short-term purchase on the dividend payment or yield. Instead, get as much research in as you possibly can before the ex-dividend date "just in case" you're actually interested in buying the stock.

Next Weekend:

  • Canadian Dividend Achievers near a New Low

Investment Observation: Transatlantic Holdings (TRH) at $48.52

Today’s Investment Observation is Transatlantic Holdings (TRH). According to Yahoo!Finance, “Transatlantic Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, offers reinsurance capacity for a range of property and casualty products, directly and through brokers, to insurance and reinsurance companies, in domestic and international markets.” Transatlantic Holdings (TRH) has increased the dividend every year for 20 years in a row. According to TRH’s May 20, 2010 press release, the company plans to increase the dividend by 5% on September 17, 2010 for shareholders of record on September 3, 2010.
In our analysis of Transatlantic Holdings (TRH), we’ll first address the technical pattern of Edson Gould’s Altimeter. The altimeter suggests to us that TRH is severely undervalued in relation to the dividend. The red horizontal line is the indicated level where TRH would normally be considered undervalued at $84 per share. On the extreme end of the overvalued range, TRH would trade at approximately $162 as indicated by the blue horizontal line.
Value Line Investment Survey has estimated that TRH would be around the $75 range by 2013. We opt to err on the side of caution on this matter and have taken the view that from the current price of $48.52, we could reasonably expect that TRH could rise to $67 or 38% over the next 2-3 years. However, our investment strategy requires that if we get a 10% gain in less than a year in a tax-deferred account then we’re considering the next best investment alternative.
According to Value Line Investment Survey, Transatlantic Holdings (TRH) is fairly valued at 10x earnings. Using the more conservative (lower) estimated earnings figure for 2010 by Value Line, TRH should return to the fair value of $65.50. Again, this is far above the current price by 35%. Value Line also indicates that TRH has a (2009) book value of $60.77 per share. Based on the current market price, TRH is selling 25.25% below book value. Dow Theory ascribes a fair value of $51.15 based on the peak of July 6, 2007 and the trough on March 9, 2009. Because the book value is higher than the Dow Theory fair value figure, I suspect that TRH will far exceed my upside targets.
When speaking of the risks to our investment view of Transatlantic Holdings (TRH), we cannot avoid the question of the black hole of AIG. The close relationship between AIG and TRH, through AIG’s prior majority ownership (59%) of TRH and funneling of business to the reinsurer, probably is the reason that TRH started moving towards the undervalued level from December 4, 2001 to March 9, 2009. According to Value Line, now that the AIG holdings of TRH stock have been sold off completely, there is one less issue to deal with in that that regard. This concern was confirmed with the following statement from TRH’s 10-Q:

As a result of its reduced ownership percentage, the AIG Group is no longer considered a related party after March 15, 2010

Transatlantic Holdings, 10-Q August 6, 2010 (PDF link), page 25, Accessed August 27, 2010.

There still is the matter of how TRH will do if AIG isn’t around to provide a “guaranteed” stream of business. I’m of the mindset that TRH had some really nice training wheels with AIG but the company has been more than ready and able to go it alone. Obviously we can see that the failure of AIG affected TRH but it didn’t put TRH out of business. So far, as corporate transitions go, TRH seems to have weathered the storm. Going forward, the primary concern for TRH should be catastrophic events which seem to increase, in magnitude, year after year.

Sell Wesco Financial (WSC) at the Market

Almost as abruptly as it was initiated, we are forced to issue a SELL recommendation for Wesco Financial Corp. (WSC). The stock has performed beyond our expectations since the Investment Observation was issued on August 24, 2010. Naturally, the rate of change in WSC couldn’t possibly continue at the same trajectory and for this reason we must issue a sell recommendation.

Warren Buffett has offered to buy the shares that he doesn’t already own of Wesco (WSC) for close to the book value of $352 per share. As we indicated in our Investment Observation, WSC is currently priced at the equivalent level of $244.55 based on the dividend increases in relation to the book value. Buffett is literally stealing the company right under our noses. There just may not be much more upside to this stock other than what the management of Berkshire Hathaway brings to the table. This is no slight to Buffett and Co. However, it would be next to impossible to obtain the same returns in such a short period of time.
WSC was recommended when it was trading at $321.24. As of the close of Thursday August 26, 2010, WSC was quoted at $363 (or $0.35 away from our estimated Dow Theory fair value level). This equals a return of 12.99% in 3 days. Conservatively, on an annualized basis this would equal approximately 1,185% return (we apologize for putting such a ridiculous number in this section but it has been our format and no one has complained about it so far.) Selling this stock now generates a return 259 times the amount of the dividend yield if the stock was held for a whole year. We will not give the run down on how the stock performed compared to treasuries.
This is not the first time that we’ve been ensnared in a recommendation that was later pursued by Warren Buffett. On the record, our May 4, 2009 recommendation of Becton Dickson (BDX) was followed up with an August 14 SEC filings by Buffett indicating that BDX was bought on June 30, 2009. At the time that the news came out, we had issued a research recommendation and a sell recommendation with a gain of 11%.
Another transaction that got caught up in the euphoria of Mr. Buffett was our Wal-Mart analysis in the article titled “Values Biding Time” published on June 18, 2009. It was not long after that article (December 23, 2009) that it was revealed that Buffett had increased his stake in Wal-Mart.  We're certain that the our selection process and the tastes of Warren Buffett are merely coincidental.  However, it is nice to know that we are possibly on the right track with the timing and quality of companies that we select.
We're working on two companies from our watch list that should be added to the Investment Observation List soon.  It is hoped that the next two companies that we profile will be just as profitable and equally as alluring from a value standpoint. 

Seth Klarman Review: Margin of Safety-Introduction

The following is a line for line analysis of Seth Klarman's book Margin of Safety.  we're providing the concept or idea that we think is being conveyed followed by the quote and page where you can find the citation.  Additionally, we follow-up with our thoughts on the concept.  We hope to review the complete book one chapter at a time.

According to GuruFocus.com, "Seth Klarman is a value investor and Portfolio Manager of the investment partnership The Baupost Group. Founded in 1983, The Baupost Group now manages $7 billion, and has averaged returns of nearly 20% annually since their inception. Seth Klarman is the author of the book "Margin of Safety" which sells for over $1000."

Introduction
  • Where investors go wrong
    • "Avoiding where others go wrong is an important step in achieving investment success. In fact, it almost ensures it.” p. xiii
        • In order to know where investors go wrong a person must first determine where and when the biggest mistakes have been made. Examining history and market tops, along with subsequent declines, help an investor to see the errors that were made right before the errors were fully revealed. In addition, the best assessments of a market decline are done afterwards as well. Hence, books like Security Analysis that followed the Crash and Depression of 1929.
  • Risk/Reward
    • Before you can focus on the remote possibility of rewards the market has to offer, you must first focus on the probability of risk of loss. p.xiii
        • No amount of stock market analysis is worth pursing if an assessment of loss, with the expectation of at least 50% loss, is not part of the equation.
  • Margin of Safety
    • Value investors should always allow “…room for imprecision, bad luck, or analytical error in order to avoid sizable losses over time.” p.xiv
        • Margin of safety means that the stock analyst expects to be wrong about their assessment and wouldn’t panic when the company that they’ve “invested” in doesn’t perform as planned.
  • The Ignorance of Indexing
    • …Indexing strategies [are] designed to avoid significant underperformance at the cost of assured mediocrity.” p. xv
        • Being categorically against indexing of all sorts, either through ETFs, Index Funds or mutual funds, it is quite apropos that Klarman would say this.
  • Know the Rationale of the Rules
    • …observing a few rules isn’t enough. Too many things change too quickly in the investment world for that approach to work [following some simple rules]. It is necessary instead to understand the rationale behind the rule in order to appreciate why they work when they do and don’t when they don’t.” Understanding the rationale behind the rules ensures success. p. xv
        • In order to really understand the rule and the premise behind them an appreciation of history is required. Such an appreciation is not for the purpose of linking disparate events together. Instead, the purpose is to learn the underlying actions and reactions that create the market rules we’re forced to adhere to today.
  • Buy Low and a lot, Sell High and buy very little
    • When prices are high risk very little capital, when prices are low risk a large amount of capital. p. xvi
        • Our allocation model states that we only buy, at the most, 5 companies when fully invested. We only buy after reviewing stocks that have reached a new low and have been thoroughly assessed. We only target the companies that have increased their dividend every year for a minimum 10 years in a row or are quality companies that are a part of required mutual fund purchases, like Nasdaq 100 stocks.
  • Avoid Market Fads (i.e. investment products)
    • The important point is not merely that junk bonds were flawed (although they certainly were) but that investors must learn from this very avoidable debacle to escape the next enticing market fad that will inevitably come along." Avoid market fads and fashions. p. xvii
        • Yield chasing and investing out of convenience ultimately doesn’t end nicely. Right now the current fad is towards stocks and funds that pay high yields. Inevitably, Wall Street will provide or create products that meet the highest demand. This will result in exceptional yields with exceptional risk. Another market fad that has existed for a long time is the belief in mutual funds and related products (ETFs, index funds, etc). These are instruments of convenience that takes the investor away from learning as they invest. The cumulative effect is that those who participate in instruments of convenience don’t accrue the “true” knowledge necessary to succeed in investing which makes them ripe for falling for the latest fad.
  • Speculation equals Opportunities
    • Speculators “…actions often inadvertently result in the creation of opportunities for value investors.” p. xvii
        • Speculators are often seen as the scrouges of the financial markets who create mayhem on whatever product they touch. However, successful speculators, of which there are few, usually quit while they’re ahead. Unsuccessful speculators, of which there are many, overreach and lose big or lose small frequently enough that the result is the same either way. The loses incurred by speculators ultimately result in the sale or disposition of assets at or below value. Value investors should be alarmed when they hear politicians clamoring for blood at the hands of speculators because many investment opportunities are created at the hands of willing sellers, typically speculators.
  • Rapid Rise and Fall
    • The rapid rise and fall of prices on a daily basis cannot possibly reflect the change in earnings on a quarterly basis. p. xviii
      • What seems most interesting is that some stocks fall in price as though there was a loss in quarterly earnings. A loss in earnings isn’t the same as earning less than expected. Some amusement is garnered from watching “investors” sell a stock simply because the company didn’t earn as much as expected. In certain instances, the rapid decline of a stock may present an opportunity to buy a stock at a reasonable price.

 Margin of Safety-Chapter 1

Email our team here.

Investment Observation: Wesco Financial Corp. (WSC) at $321.24

Today’s Investment Observation is on Wesco Financial (WSC). According to Value Line, Wesco Financial is a diversified company engaged “…in the insurance, furniture rental, and steel service center businesses in the United States.” Charles T. Munger heads Wesco Financial (WSC) and is 80% owned by Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A). Wesco Financial (WSC) has increased its dividend for 38 years in a row.
Our initial interest in WSC is drawn directly from Edson Gould’s Altimeter, which puts the dividend payment in relative terms compared to the stock price. This is important since the continuous increase of the dividend is never reflected in the stock charts available. As seen in the chart below, WSC is now selling at a support level that was first established (on a relative basis) on May 12, 1997.
If we use the Altimeter’s peaks and troughs, we arrive at an upside target of $533 (point A). We expect that our upside target is too optimistic and therefore set our sights for the most realistic target of $410. Our downside target, based on the Altimeter, is $246 (point B) or 24% below the closing price of August 23, 2010. However, we would advise investors to build in the expectation that the stock could decline as much as 50% from the current level. The way the New Low Observer team deals with this issue is by buying 50% (of the intended amount to be invested) now and holding the remaining amount for the prospect of the decline.
Our previous experience investing in WSC was back in late 2007 to early 2008 (2008 transaction history). At the time, WSC had all the redeeming attributes that we see today. However, we sold the stock for a –4% loss just before the price jumped 13%. Although we were quick to pull the trigger on selling WSC with a –4% loss the subsequent 42% decline was worth avoiding.
Dow Theory indicates that WSC is assumed to be at fair value when the stock has reached $363.35 based on the peak from March 18, 2010 to the closing price of July 2, 2010. However, to be as conservative as possible, we would take the high of 2010 and the low of 2009 and determine a worst-case scenario of fair value and arrived at $314.22. This indicates that as long as WSC can hold above the worst-case scenario of fair value, the gains in this stock are almost assured.
There are a few other features that are of particular interest regarding WSC. According to Valueline, there has been absolutely no change in the number of shares outstanding since 2002. In addition, WSC has long-term debt that is negligible and falling since 2002 while the book value has increased by 30.26% over the same period of time. Speaking of book value, based on the dividend increases since May 1997, WSC is selling at the equivalent of $224.55, a discount of 31.25% of the current indicated book value of $352. It should be noted that the current price of WSC is the same as back in 2002.
For some strange reason, we’d like to believe that WSC should mirror the performance of BRK-A even though we know this is not true. Both companies are very different not to mention the fact that BRK-A is diversified with a triple A rating. However, we couldn’t resist the temptation to include a comparison chart of WSC (blue line) and BRK-A (red line) since 1997.
In closing, we make our greatest case against WSC with the words of its CEO Charlie Munger:
Business and human quality in place at Wesco continues to be not nearly as good, all factors considered, as that in place at Berkshire Hathaway. Wesco is not an equally-good but smaller version of Berkshire Hathaway, better because its small size makes growth easier. Instead, each dollar of book value at Wesco continues plainly to provide much less intrinsic value than a similar dollar of book value at Berkshire Hathaway. Moreover, the 7 quality disparity in book value’s intrinsic merits has, in recent years, continued to widen in favor of Berkshire Hathaway. All that said, we make no attempt to appraise relative attractiveness for investment of Wesco versus Berkshire Hathaway stock at present stock-market quotations.
Munger, Charles T. Wesco Financial Corporation, Letter to Shareholders. February 25, 2009. Page 7. http://www.wescofinancial.com/cm2008.pdf (PDF). Accessed August 23, 2010.
I’m reluctant to accept that Mr. Munger isn’t just under-promising for the sole purpose of over-performing down the road. At the time that Munger made the above statement WSC was trading at $249.24. Since February 25, 2009, WSC has climbed 30% while BRK-A has climbed 45%. I guess Munger was right. However, I’ll take the 30% increase any day of the week.
There is so much in favor of this company, from a fundamental and technical standpoint, that we recommend doing some cursory research on WSC. Despite the coming global financial collapse caused by hemorrhaging U.S. deficits, Wesco Financial will be around to match the current Dividend Achievers with continuous increases for 55 years in a row.

Canadian Dividend Achievers

This list of Canadian Dividend Achievers, published by Mergent's, includes current and former Canadian Dividend Achievers and then ranking the companies based on those closest to the 52-week low as of August 20, 2010. We've updated the stock symbol to connect to the Financial Post, one of Canada's top business publications. You'll find the most complete fundamental information on these companies at the FP website. However, Yahoo!Finance probably has the better long-term charts and historical dividend data. Enjoy.

FP Symbol Yahoo Symbol Name Price Pct from Yr Low
ESI ESI.TO ENSIGN ENERGY SERVICES INC. $11.90 1.45%
IMO IMO.TO IMPERIAL OIL $38.88 2.99%
POW POW.TO POWER CORP CDA $26.03 3.50%
RBA RBA.TO RITCHIE BROS AUCTIONEERS INC. $18.94 4.64%
PWF PWF.TO POWER FINANCIAL CORP. $28.07 4.93%
GWO GWO.TO GREAT-WEST LIFECO INC $24.50 6.48%
IGM IGM.TO IGM FINANCIAL INC. $39.15 6.65%
CTC.A CTC-A.TO CANADIAN TIRE CORP $54.81 7.77%
SU SU.TO SUNCOR ENERGY INC. $32.68 9.26%
TLM TLM.TO TALISMAN ENERGY INC. $17.25 9.80%
CNQ CNQ.TO CDN NATURAL RES $33.75 11.29%
IAG IAG.TO INDUSTRIAL ALLIANCE $30.40 11.85%
SNC SNC.TO SNC-LAVALIN SV $46.65 12.17%
TRI TRI.TO THOMSON REUTERS $36.80 12.47%
TD TD.TO TORONTO-DOMINION BANK $70.52 15.29%
BNS BNS.TO BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA $50.85 18.37%
Watch List Summary
Below are the best and worst performing Canadian Dividend Achievers in the period from August 6, 2010 to August 20, 2010.
    Leaders:
    • Toromont (TIH.TO) rose 8.52%.
    • Pason Systems (PSI.TO) rose 7.43%.
    • Ag Growth International (AFN.TO) rose 6.73%.
    Laggards:
    • Transcontinental Inc. (TCL-A.TO) fell -12.30%.
    • Methanex Corp. (MX.TO) fell -8.07%.
    • Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) fell -7.38% 

    Robert Rodriguez Review: September 1994

    One person that the New Low Observer team truly admires in the world of investing is Robert Rodriguez. Mr. Rodriguez had an investment strategy that is very close to the approach that we have employed by examining quality stocks near a new low. The beauty of Rodriguez’s work is that he has an unparalleled investment record in the realm of small and mid-cap companies. From my perspective, there are so many challenges working against companies with a market capitalization of $1 billion or less. However, Rodriguez made it look easy even though we’re certain that it wasn’t. According to GuruFocus, during his time as the manager of the FPA Capital funds, Rodriguez “…has achieved an annualized return of 16.91% as of 9/30/2007. In the same period S&P 500 has returned 13.17% annually.”  (related FPA performance data)

    In the Letter to Shareholders dated September 30, 1994 (PDF), Rodriguez says a couple of things that I feel are worth repeating. In the first excerpt, Rodriguez compares the market declines of 1987, 1990 and 1994. Rodriguez speculates as to the reasons why 1994 was different from 1987 and 1990. He mentioned that in 1987 the stock market crash was due to computer selling while in 1990 the prospect of war became a reality.
    In 1987, Rodriguez thought that the ability to make the decision to sell stocks was easy. The unfamiliarity of computer selling made the choice to sell academic. Likewise, the prospect of war in 1990 was clearly bad so selling stocks wasn’t an issue for average investors.

    According to Rodriguez, 1994 was different because of the following:
    The Fed has shifted to a tighter monetary policy. Interest rates are rising while inflation fears are growing. Will these factors lead to a possible recession in 1995? All are situations that most investors have faced before; therefore, they have created a longer period of investor uncertainty.
    This leads Rodriguez to conclude:
    In this type of an environment, an individual stock’s characteristics tend to play a greater role than any one single event. Stock picking has a potentially higher probability of being a successful strategy and this is where we feel our strength lies.
    My thoughts are that when compared to a market crash or a war, the prospect of a recession is a 50/50 proposition. This causes investors to waver as to whether they should buy or sell stocks. Undecided investors cause the market to become range bound allowing for companies to collect earnings that, in turn, builds value into the price of the stock creating unique value opportunities. This is not unlike the current investment environment where there market has fluctuated in a range due to the agonizing over the threat of a “double dip” recession. Whether a recession materializes, occurring shortly after a small uptick, is a topic for another day.

    Rodriguez ends the September 1994 Letter to Shareholders with a quote that can’t be beat:

    Thank goodness we focus on individual stocks rather than trying to forecast the stock market. The former is far more rewarding and predictable.
    This last quote by Rodriguez explains why the New Low Observer team places so much emphasis on individual stocks rather than mutual funds, index funds and ETFs. With all of the aforementioned products, if a selling spree ensues, the fund can decline despite the quality of the holdings.
    • Hand wringing over the threat of recessions helps to create value in the market.
    • Individual stocks, not funds, have a greater probability of generating higher investment returns.

    Intel Buys McAfee, New Low Gets it Right…Again

    Today it was announced that Intel (INTC) agreed to buy McAfee (MFE) for $7.68 billion.  In a series of articles that started on March 20, 2010 (article link), the New Low Observer team bubbled with excitement over the fact that the chip sector, as broad as it is, was severely undervalued.  On March 20th we said:
    "...it is noted that the majority of the companies that pay a dividend are related to the chip sector. Clustering of companies in a specific industry may indicate that the entire sector is undervalued."
    On March 22, 2010 (article link), the New Low team answered a reader question about Applied Material (AMAT).  In that article, titled "Applied Materials and the Chip Sector Should Be on Your Radar," we said:
    "Our opinion is that the chip sector is ripe for mergers and acquisitions."
     Finally, on March 22, 2010 (article link), the New Low team, prompted by the purchase of Techwell Corp. (TWLL) by Intersil Corp. (ISIL), pointed out specific reasons why we thought that the chip sector was ripe for mergers, acquisitions and/or extremely undervalued in the following quote:
    "...the fact that the purchase was done with cash is a testament to the fact that the chip manufacturers have abundant cash or are under priced and undervalued."
    We closed our March 22, 2010 (article link) article with a quote that we hope ever reader of our website will put to the test.
    "Once it can be verified that companies in a specific industry are undervalued, you can rest assured that the mergers and acquisitions will begin. The fact that cash is being used to buy up companies is the final nail in the coffin on the theory of an undervalued sector."
    Since we started the New Low Observer, we have been able to identify the water sector, the biotech/pharma sector, the medical device sector and now the chip sector as undervalued before acquisitions or substantial price gains occurred. It should be noted that we don't have any special skills, just the willingness to carefully observe and sometimes buy companies that have fallen to a new low. Get the research going for the companies that are part of the chip sector, and never chase a stock that has a rising price.

    Richard Russell Review: China in the ’60s

    The genius of Richard Russell can be found in his ability to observe.  At least 30 years before China was on the lips of yet to be born hedge fund managers and venture capitalists,  Richard Russell was providing clarity on the future of China while it was in the throes of Communist power.  The following are excerpts of Russell's commentary on China during the 1960's.  Russell himself never touts his record on his prescient views specifically on China, consider this among the first.

    July 25, 1962. Issue Number 188. page 4.
    In this issue, Russell compares the conventional wisdom with what ultimately became the outcome which tended to be counter, or opposite, to the prevailing view. One comparison that was made was from the period of 1958-1961.  Russell said: “Russia [was] way ahead of U.S. in space. Communists taking over the world and apparently unstoppable. Everything [was] going Russia’s way.” The final reality was that by 1962 “Russian space progress greatly exaggerated. Russia runs into economic trouble. The rise of China as the possible great threat.”
    May 25, 1965. Issue Number 289. page 4.
    “A fascinating aside on the gold picture is the news that Red China has now joined Russia as an interested accumulator of gold. According to the New York Times, China has recently purchased over $60 million of gold through the London Gold pool.”
    December 21, 1965. Issue Number 309. page 2.
    “A strong, competitive, aggressive country tend to accumulate gold, while a country which is plagued by inflation, rising costs, ineffective budget control and political ineptitudes tends to lose gold.”
    December 21, 1965. Issue Number 309. page 4.
    “China obviously wants to prolong the war [with Viet Nam], and it is this writer’s opinion that China sees the war as part of her economic battle with the U.S. China knows that continuation of the war will have the effect of bleeding this nation dry.”
    January 11, 1966. Issue Number 311. page 2.
    “As I see it, China is very much afraid of war with the U.S. (see Sundry Comments), and the fact is that China has backed away from real confrontation with the U.S. whenever that possibility has arisen. On the other hand, I believe Russia would like the keep the war expanding in the hopes that the U.S. will ultimately turn her nuclear capabilities against China (note the reports of new giant Russian-made mortars in the hands of Vietcong). If Russia can bring this off, she will have rid herself of the Chinese nuclear and population explosion threat, and she will have emerged as the second or greatest power on earth.”
    February 1, 1966, Issue Number 313. page 2.
    “It is well to remember that the Communists (ironically) view capitalism from an orthodox (pre-Keynesian) standpoint, and the Chinese in particular have always been fiscal conservatives.”
     “An interesting aside is that renewed gold buying has come in from Red China (in the London Market). This prompted the London Economist to note ‘The buying represents not a switch out of sterlings, but out of Swiss francs. China has apparently been accumulating them in greater quantity than was generally suspected.’ This gold buying fits in with the writer’s thesis that China is fighting an economic war with the U.S., and that she wants ultimately to compete with capitalism in the marketplace. China’s unannounced motto might be, ‘Keep buying gold while the U.S. loses her own gold.’”
    September 21, 1966, Issue Number 335. page 3.
    “The Third World force is to be China, the looming giant of the East. In time, thinks DeGaulle, the buffer force will be ‘cemented’ and grow powerful, in time China will be a superpower to be reckoned with…”
    “Russia and China are fully aware of the power of the yellow metal, and both are making every effort to bolster their holdings. The scene is set for drama over Africa. But in this writer’s opinion, history will favor those who understand the old adage, ‘Gold will win.’”
    February 17, 1967, Issue Number 349. page 2.
    “…Russia wants the war to continue, since it keep the U.S. ‘aimed’ continually at Russia’s real enemy, China.”

     
    As with the first entry on July 25, 1962, it may be necessary to reflect on the conventional wisdom to determine if things going forward may not turn out as many analysts expect. 
     
    Citation Note:

    Highest Yielding Nasdaq 100 Stocks

    Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of their respective 52-week lows and ranked by highest dividend yield. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and considerable due diligence.
    Symbol
    Name
    Price
    P/E
    EPS
    Yield
    P/B
    % from Low
    Garmin Ltd.
    $27.05
    8.17
    $3.31
    5.40%
    2.09
    1.92%
    Paychex, Inc.
    $24.97
    18.93
    $1.32
    5.00%
    6.39
    1.30%
    Maxim Integrated Products
    $16.75
    68.93
    $0.24
    5.00%
    2.12
    6.01%
    KLA-Tencor Corporation
    $29.10
    23.72
    $1.23
    3.40%
    2.18
    9.03%
    Intel Corporation
    $19.15
    11.46
    $1.67
    3.20%
    2.36
    4.59%
    Linear Technology
    $29.25
    18.52
    $1.58
    3.10%
    170.06
    14.44%
    Applied Materials, Inc.
    $11.17
    34.91
    $0.32
    2.50%
    2.05
    2.10%
    Steel Dynamics, Inc.
    $13.69
    14.35
    $0.95
    2.20%
    1.44
    6.21%
    Microsoft Corporation
    $24.40
    11.61
    $2.10
    2.10%
    4.60
    7.35%
    QUALCOMM
    $37.95
    19.96
    $1.90
    2.00%
    3.09
    19.98%
    Staples, Inc.
    $19.11
    17.68
    $1.08
    1.90%
    2.08
    1.54%
    Cintas Corporation
    $25.84
    18.31
    $1.41
    1.80%
    1.57
    11.86%
    Patterson Companies Inc.
    $26.66
    14.97
    $1.78
    1.50%
    2.29
    10.48%
    Costco Wholesale
    $55.31
    19.79
    $2.80
    1.50%
    2.21
    17.43%
    Activision Blizzard, Inc
    $10.87
    42.13
    $0.26
    1.40%
    1.22
    9.47%
    Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
    $49.97
    17.75
    $2.82
    1.30%
    2.35
    6.34%
    Ross Stores, Inc.
    $49.03
    12.31
    $3.98
    1.30%
    4.93
    15.91%
    Sigma-Aldrich Corporation
    $53.84
    17.65
    $3.05
    1.20%
    3.85
    15.78%
    CA Inc.
    $18.32
    12.04
    $1.52
    0.90%
    1.83
    2.92%
    Oracle Corporation
    $22.66
    18.74
    $1.21
    0.90%
    3.74
    12.74%
    DENTSPLY International Inc.
    $30.24
    16.32
    $1.85
    0.70%
    2.62
    6.86%
    Watch List Summary
    The best performing stock from our July 30th Nasdaq 100 Watch List was Vertex Pharmceuticals (VRTX) which increased +7.52% .  Much of Vertex's gain can be attributed to a study which indicated that the hepatitis C drug may allow for a shorter treatment time (Forbes article).  Vertex's main competetitor in this area is Merck.
    The worst performing stock from July 30th was Seagate Technology (STX).  Seagate fell -10.92% on news of a downgrade from Barclays Capital (Barron's article).  The expectation is that weak demand will impair profit margins at least until the end of 2010.
    This week's list makes it challenging to ignore Paychex (PAYX) and Garmin (GRMN).  The arguments that are made for PAYX increase each day the price declines.  According to Valueline, PAYX normally trades at fair value around 22 times the cash flow per share.  If this were the case, PAYX would be trading around $35.20 or 29% higher than Friday August 13th closing price based on 2010 estimated cash flow.   The primary concern with PAYX is the dividend payout ratio which is very high.  GRMN wouldn't be so difficult of an investment  if they paid a quarterly dividend.  However, Valueline has GRMN priced at fair value around $44.10 or 63% above the current price.

    International Dividend High Fliers

    Below are the top ten current and former international dividend high fliers (ranked by dividend yield) that trade as ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange. These are companies that have had a history of dividend increases over the last several years in a row. While this list contains the top ten companies, the full list of 40 companies within 20% of the 52-week low can be found here.
    Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield P/B % from Low
    CRH CRH PLC $19.17 16.98 1.13 5.50% 1.1 1.29%
    CWCO Consolidated Water $9.68 21.37 0.45 3.00% 1.14 1.79%
    SNY Sanofi-Aventis SA $28.64 9.65 2.97 3.80% 1.13 2.25%
    ALTE Alterra Capital Holdings Ltd $17.65 4.79 3.68 2.60% 0.73 2.26%
    UL Unilever PLC $26.66 15.37 1.73 4.10% 4.77 3.57%
    DEG Etablissements Delhaize Freres $66.30 10.05 6.6 2.00% 1.22 3.74%
    UN Unilever NV $27.02 15.58 1.73 4.00% 4.82 3.84%
    PRE PartnerRe Ltd. $72.55 4.75 15.28 2.70% 0.78 4.95%
    TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical Industries $49.97 17.75 2.82 1.30% 2.35 6.34%
    ESLT Elbit Systems Ltd. $52.10 0 0 0 0 7.42%
    STO Statoil ASA $19.84 13.35 1.49 3.90% 1.92 7.59%
    SYT Syngenta AG $46.84 17.94 2.61 2.00% 3.25 9.11%
    RNR RenaissanceRe Holdings $55.86 4.02 13.9 1.80% 0.98 10.70%
    AXS Axis Capital Holdings $30.40 8.77 3.47 2.80% 0.73 11.68%
    KYO Kyocera Corp $87.80 19.5 4.5 N/A 1.05 13.07%
    ACE Ace Limited $53.42 6.3 8.48 2.50% 0.84 13.44%
    ASR Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste $44.89 15.52 2.89 4.10% 1.2 13.70%
    TMX Telefonos de Mexico $14.83 9.51 1.56 5.10% 4.09 14.08%
    SU Suncor Energy Inc $31.59 19.51 1.62 1.20% 1.49 14.25%
    PBR Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. $35.87 N/A - - N/A 14.93%
    NGG National Grid $42.38 9.71 4.37 8.50% 3.18 15.41%
    NVS Novartis AG $50.19 11.75 4.27 3.30% 2.05 15.43%
    TOT Total S.A. $49.76 8.95 5.56 4.70% 1.43 15.53%
    SNN Smith & Nephew SNATS, $44.32 14.25 3.11 1.30% 3.43 15.72%
    SLB Schlumberger  $58.76 23.16 2.54 1.40% 3.58 16.31%
    CCH COCA COLA HELLENIC BOTTLING $23.12 15.56 1.49 1.40% 2.47 17.06%
    EOC Empresa Nacional de Electricida $49.99 13.89 3.6 3.00% 3.15 17.71%
    GSK GlaxoSmithKline PLC $38.14 15.59 2.45 5.00% 7.04 18.63%
    CHL China Mobile Limited $52.69 12.59 4.18 3.20% 2.87 18.64%
    BG Bunge Limited $54.19 3.92 13.83 1.70% 0.76 19.47%
    AMX America Movil, S.A.B. $49.53 13.99 3.54 0.50% 4.75 19.81%
    WSH Willis Group Holdings $29.92 11.31 2.65 3.40% 2.12 19.82%
    Please be sure to calculate the payout ratios before buying these stocks. Payout ratios above 70% are cutting it close if you're not prepared for the potential downside risk. The stock symbols next to the company names take you directly to the history of dividend payments. As always, only buy these stocks if you're willing to accept losing at 50%, otherwise, the risk may outweigh the reward. Thanks again to the author of The Stock Market Advantage for the suggestion on including international stocks.

    Watch List summary

    Below are the companies that appeared on our international list for May 30, 2010.

    Symbol Name May 30, 2010 August 13, 2010 % change
    NGG National Grid $40.54 $42.38 4.54%
    GSK GlaxoSmithKline $33.46 $38.14 13.99%
    TEF Telefonica $57.37 $66.93 16.66%
    AZN AstraZeneca $42.25 $51.39 21.63%
    RUK Reed Elsevier $27.99 $33.42 19.40%
    BP British Petroleum $42.95 $38.93 -9.36%
    TMX Telefonos de Mexico $14.07 $14.83 5.40%
    TOT Total S.A. $46.63 $49.76 6.71%
    BTI British American Tobacco $58.55 $70.36 20.17%
    STD Banco Santander $10.15 $12.07 18.92%
    Average gain 11.81%
    Double digit gains were pronounced for this group except the usual suspect BP along with Total, Telefonos de Mexico and National Grid. The previous list was ranked by dividend yield instead of those closest to the new low. However, all companies on the May 30th list were all within 10% of their respective 52%-week low.
    Email our team here.

    From Macro to Micro, Cree Follow Up

    We wrote an article titled "It's a Matter of Economics, Cree is Overpriced" back in early June. The purpose of that article was not urging investors to short Cree or the market but to observe what happen to company with overly optimistic expectations. We felt that Cree (CREE) was a perfect case in point. So where are we with CREE?
    Yesterday Cree reported earnings that exceeded expectations but revenue guidance missed the consensus view. As a result, UBS analyst took the target price down to $64 from $83. The target price of $83 was reached in April and since the stock has been trading in $60 and $75 range.
    Fundamental
    The data looks good for Cree. Revenue rose 79% year-over-year while earnings per share exploded 348%! Operating margin expanded to 25.9% from 19.7% mentioned in the last article. These are amazing figures but how is it possible that such a great quarter shares could be down more than 10%?  Possible explanation is that all the good news have been discounted into the stock as suggested by Dow Theory.
    Another piece of interesting data to support our argument was from the equipment side of the LED market. We mentioned that Kulicke & Soffa (KLIC) had a tremendous amount of booking (equipment orders) from the LED side of the market. Prior to that, they didn't have any business in that segment. Additional data point came another research firm, Displaybank, which claimed that the Blue LED capacity is to double. The equipments mentioned are the Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (MOCVD) systems which is the primary method of depositing film onto wafers in the LED making process. The front-end of the market (depositing films) has now confirmed with back-end (assembly).
    Technical Picture
    The up-trend was established beginning December 2008. As the market (Dow Jones Industrial Average) made a lower-low in March of 2009, Cree held above their December 2008 low pointing to a sustained rally. Through out 2009 and the most of 2010, it held above the 50 days moving average and 200 days moving average. The collapse in price today established an opening price below the 200 days moving average which we use as a long-term trend of the stock.

    Summary
    Today's fallout of Cree could simply be just another pull back then resume the rally. We're not quite so sure. At this rate, we wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole. Once again, we don't encourage shorting. Shares of Cree could easily move back to $80 as it retraces the old high. The purpose is to point out the obvious fact that when things are rosy and analyst are upping their forecasts inflating the P/E, investors should be looking for the exit sign. The macro view of margin contraction and entrance of competition are nature of business which affect the micro view in the long run. The short run of the stock market could be anything but the long run are often determined by value. After the fall of today, Cree trailing P/E will be around 35, much lower than 60 we observed in June. Even if earning exploded, multiple (P/E) contraction will be the key to share price going forward.

    Sources:
    It's a Matter of Economics, Cree is Overpriced
    Report: Blue LED capacity set to double
    Cree Swoons On Disappointing Guidance; UBS Cuts Rating
    Cree Reports Record Revenue and Net Income for the Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2010

    Email our team here.

    Canadian Dividend Achievers

    This list of Canadian Dividend Achievers, published by Mergent's, includes current and former Canadian Dividend Achievers and then ranking the companies based on those closest to the 52-week low as of August 6, 2010. We've updated the stock symbol to connect to the Financial Post, one of Canada's top business publications. You'll find the most complete fundamental information on these companies at the FP website. However, Yahoo!Finance probably has the better long-term charts and historical dividend data. Enjoy.
    FP Yahoo!Finance Name Price % from Low
    RBA RBA.TO RITCHIE BROS AUCTIONEERS INC. $18.51 2.27%
    ESI ESI.TO ENSIGN ENERGY SERVICES INC. $12.70 4.35%
    PWF PWF.TO POWER FINANCIAL CORP. $28.29 5.76%
    IMO IMO.TO IMPERIAL OIL $40.15 6.36%
    POW POW.TO POWER CORP CDA $26.98 7.28%
    GWO GWO.TO GREAT-WEST LIFECO INC $24.76 7.61%
    IGM IGM.TO IGM FINANCIAL INC. $40.18 9.45%
    CTC.A CTC-A.TO CANADIAN TIRE CORP $56.99 12.05%
    SU SU.TO SUNCOR ENERGY INC. $34.11 14.04%
    TIH TIH.TO TOROMONT IND $24.88 14.18%
    SNC SNC.TO SNC-LAVALIN SV $47.76 14.84%
    TLM TLM.TO TALISMAN ENERGY INC. $18.15 15.53%
    TRI TRI.TO THOMSON REUTERS CORP. $37.85 15.68%
    PSI PSI.TO PASON SYSTEMS INC. $11.03 16.11%
    BNS BNS.TO BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA $50.88 18.44%
    TD TD.TO TORONTO-DOMINION BANK $73.09 19.51%
    IAG IAG.TO INDUSTRIAL ALLIANCE $32.53 19.68%

    Watch List Summary
    Below are the best and worst performing Canadian Dividend Achievers in the period from July 23, 2010 to August 6, 2010.
      Leaders:
      • Canaccord Genuity and Raymond James upgraded Talisman Energy on August 4, 2010. Shares of Talisman Energy rose +8.49%.
      • Cameco Corporation rose +6.43%.
      • Finning International was appointed as the Caterpillar dealer for Northern Ireland on August 2, 2010. Shares of Finning International rose +6.96%.
      Laggards:
      • Corus Entertainment fell –8.40%.
      • Industrial Alliance fell –7.35%.
      • Ritchie Brothers Auctioneers fell –3.14%.

      Next Week:

      • Nasdaq 100 Watch List
      • International Dividend Achievers