Category Archives: cycle analysis

The Lending Cycle

Continue reading

Real Estate Cycle

The following is our general overview of where we are in the real estate cycle.

Continue reading

1870-2033: Real Estate Cycles

The history of real estate cycles should inform how to analyze the market.  However, there is an abundance of analysis without a review of the history, which generates conclusions that are unrelated to how the real estate market works.  Additionally, symptoms are given more prominence than the causes leading investors, speculators, buyers, and sellers down a path of misunderstanding.

Below is a chart of the real estate cycle from 1870 to 2033. Continue reading

Bitcoin Cycles: 2010-2021

The following are the established Bitcoin cycles since 2010 which are instrumental in our forecasting of the market price for Bitcoin going forward.

Up Cycles

image

Down Cycles

image

Cycle charts and Future Targets Continue reading

Interest Rate Cycle Comparison

1940-2020: The Full Interest Rate Cycle

image

Reasonable assumption on interest rates should be done based on relative or comparable starting points.  With interest rates at secular lows, we should only compare rate activity from the 1940 to 1980 period which was a secular rising trend while avoid comparing rate activity to the 1980 to 2008 period.

Fastest Rate Increase, From the Low

Below we compare the rate increase of the 3-Month Treasury from the secular low in 1940 at 0.01% to the rate increases from the 2011 low at 0.01%.

image

From the level of 0.01% to 2.39%, the rate of increase was exaggerated for the period from 2011 to 2019 compared to the period of 1940 to 1956.  The currently level of volatility is not unexpected for the early phase of the secular rising rate trend.

Real Estate: October 2019

On December 9, 2010, in an article titled “Real Estate: The Verdict Is In”, we said the following:

“Based on the indicated sources above, we feel that real estate has a six to nine year stretch of rising prices or ‘trading’ in a range and decreased foreclosures.”

Real Estate Prices since December 2010:

image

Foreclosures since December 2010: 

image

As part of the commentary in 2010, the expectation of the 6-9 years of increasing prices is currently showing signs of fatigue as indicated in the year-over-year change of the S&P/Schiller National Home Price Index:

image

Nine years in and there is the increasing chance that the declining year-over-year rate of change since 2013 may be coming to an end.  Although we’d like to see the rate of increase get closer to zero we think that, more or less, the trend could moderate before exceeding the previous year-over-year highs of 2018.

Going back to that December 2010 article, we presented a chart of the Real Estate Loans, All Commercial Banks (REALLN) on a year-over-year basis.  Although December 2010 wasn’t the absolute low in the indicator, it wasn’t long before that level became a distant memory.

image

The points in the chart above, circled in red, are levels showing moderation in the rising trend.  Our belief is that these provide the respite that is needed and expected in a well functioning housing market.  The current moderation after the decline from the 2013 peak suggests that we’re at or near the end of the 9 year half cycle in the 18-year rising trend of real estate.

What did we just say?

We think another round of rising real estate prices is near.  While the indicator can fall further, we think that the current level has been consistent with the 18-year cycle as pointed out by Roy Wenzlick.  For this reason, we think that the next trend in real estate price will eclipse what has already been seen with year-over-year increases reaching double digit levels.  Ideally, this level of increase in real estate will occur after a 1991-like recession.

Bitcoin: Cycles 2010-2019

The following are the established Bitcoin cycles since 2010 which are instrumental in our forecasting of the market price for Bitcoin going forward.

image

In the period from July 2010 to November 2011, Bitcoin increased +42,185.61% and decreased from the peak -93.07%.

image

In the period from November 2011 to August 2013, Bitcoin increased +11,119.51% and decreased from the peak -71.16%.

image

In the period from April 2013 to October 2014, Bitcoin increased +1,629.35% and decreased from the peak -84.54%.

image

In the period from October 2014 to May 2019, Bitcoin increased +10,811.01% and decreased from the peak -83.48%. Our October 7, 2014 recommendation of Bitcoin at $334.09 found here.

Bitcoin Archives

Dow 50k by 2023? How about 177k by 2032?

In a USA Today article titled “Dow hitting 50,000 by 2023? Market milestone is within reach, investor claims”, money manager Charles Lemonides says, “…investors ‘should build their portfolios recognizing Dow 50,000 is a real possibility’ by 2022 or 2023.”

image

This prediction sounds spectacular and harkens back to our January 3, 2018 article titled “Dow 130,000 by 2032.”  That article was premised on our November 2012 article suggesting that the secular bear market would end between 2016 and 2023.  After further analysis, in March 2013, we concluded that “…If the current implications are correct, we could be on the cusp of a run to Dow 100,000.”

What stands out about Lemonides’ forecast for the next five years?  While we were projecting a +12% compounded annual growth rate, Lemonides is forecasting a +15.09% compounded annual growth rate over the next five years.  If the +15.09% growth rate is projected out to 2032 then the Dow Jones Industrial Average would sit at 177,200.

Dow 130,000 by 2032

Summary

  • In 1999, Warren Buffett said that stock market returns would underperform over the next 17 years.
  • Cycles indicate that the next 17 years will be a secular bull market.
  • Volume data and price recovery were the keys to the change in the trend.
  • Magnitude of secular trends in the past point to 10-fold gains in DJIA.
  • The work of Edson Gould in 1935, 1979 and today.
  • Look for average real compounded annual returns of +12% v. the historical +7% real returns.

Homebuilder Confidence at 18 Year High

In an articled titled “America's homebuilders haven't felt this good since 1999” found on Yahoo!Finance dated December 18, 2017, it is noted that homebuilders confidence is “…now at a higher level than it was at any point during the housing bubble.”  Does this mean that a crash in the housing market is coming?

image

To clarify whether a crash is coming, we’ve taken the data that is referenced in the article and laid bare the elements of a real estate market cycle.  In the article it is said that the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI) “…hit an 18-year high of 74, topping expectations for a reading of 70 and well above last month’s reading of 69.”

As we’ve pointed out, based on the work of Roy Wenzlick, there is an approximate 18-year real estate cycle for peaks and troughs.  When we look at the HMI chart (full cycle in red), we can clearly see that major cycle lows have an 18 year period of separation.  While this is only a coincidence, it fits well with the work of Wenzlick who confidently shows this cycle (1795-1974) in his writings from 1930-1974.

Continue reading

Real Estate Review

On September 12, 2016, we assess the real estate market.  In this update, we’ll reconsider the points that we made to determine the progress that has been made with our analysis.  There are some surprises as we go through the limit info that is tracked.

In this assessment, we track the Housing Starts of New Privately Owned Housing Units.  At the time of the September 2016 review, we said the following:

“The latest trend from September 2015 to the present appears to show topping out action as the Housing Starts data seems to be running out of steam.  Additionally, the dotted red line in the chart shows the Dow Theory halfway point at which either the market booms higher or stalls & stutters before declining substantially, relative to the most recent rise.”

So far, the data has fallen in alignment with our claim of topping out action, as seen in the chart below.

Bull Market Ranking

For anyone who claims that the current bull market is a Federal Reserve induced binge based on manipulated monetary policy, this market still has to exceed the bull market that followed the decline of 1852 before the non-central bank era bull markets could be legitimately ignored.  For those willing to look at the history of stock market recoveries, we present the top ten market recoveries from 1835 to 2017.

Continue reading

Bull Market Ranking

For anyone who claims that the current bull market is a Federal Reserve induced binge based on manipulated interest rates, this market still needs to exceed the bull markets that followed the declines of 1835 & 1852, bringing the Dow Jones Industrial Average above the 24,768.

image

This market has a way to go in order to exceed bull markets that occurred when there was no Federal Reserve Bank.  The next stop for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, to beat the bull market that began in 1842 and culminated in a gain of +236% by 1852, is 21,673.

We could easily see new highs in the stock market, however, it ain’t because of the Fed.  More here.

Real Estate Review

On December 9, 2010, we wrote an article titled “Real Estate: The Verdict Is In”.  At the time, we said the following:

“As we come to the close of 2010, it appears that based on the narrow scope of sources that we’ve selected, the bottom in real estate has come and gone.”

Since that time, the real estate market has experienced what we’d consider to be a recovery.  This is a follow-up on the indicators from that 2010 article to see how far along we have come in the current recovery and where we might expect the market to go from here.

Continue reading

The Nature of Market Booms and Busts

In a recent article on SeekingAlpha.com titled “The Bigger The Boom, The Bigger The Bust” by William Koldus, it was suggested that:

  • “…we have already forgotten the lessons that should have been learned in 2008.”
  • “Monetary policy makers have set the course for the next ‘Minsky Moment.’"
  • “A good dose of volatility in both the stock and bond markets would be good for all financial market participants.”

In our review of Koldus’ work, we’ll attempt to demonstrate that analysis on stock market history should not begin with evidence that is narrowly defined. Our introduction of secular trends in the market might help put current market moves into perspective.  We’ll also show that the Federal Reserve might not be as powerful as some might think.  Finally, we hope to demonstrate that a moving market, either up or down, is good regardless of the extent and timing.

Continue reading