Category Archives: downside

“Scary” 1929 Chart Says Little About the Future

On February 11, 2014, Mark Hulbert of MarketWatch.com posted an article titled “Scary 1929 Market Chart Gains Traction (found here)”.  In the article, Hulbert suggests that the critics of the chart, which shows a parallel between the current market action since July 2012 and 1928-1929, are running out of explanations as to why the chart doesn’t have merit.

image

One aspect missing from the Hulbert article is what it takes to get from the most recent high of 16,588 to the 1,658 level on the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  In order to lose -89% in value, the Dow would need to decline first to 15k, 14k, 13k etc.  Leaving out these important hurdles on the downside ignores a wide swath of goings-on that needs to occur in between now and the doomsday low.  To fill the void that is unexamined by the Hulbert article, we’re going to review the various ways that the Dow Jones Industrial Average could decline to new lows.

Before offering our downside take on the market, we’d like to refer you to some basic issues that are mandatory to understanding how the stock market decline from 1929 was an anomaly, at best.  In previous work on the topic, we’ve addressed reasons why the 1929 stock market decline of -89% had more to do with reshuffling of the index by replacing stocks that had fallen significantly with new stocks that had appeared strong but were on the cusp of major declines.  Once the new stocks were added to the index they crashed hard while the stocks that were dropped from the index were at the beginning stages of recovery (2009 article found here).

In another piece, we outlined the fact that the decline of 1929 was followed by a recovery that was much faster than most investors know.  Our theory is that the multiple changes to the index artificially suppress the index on the way down and on the way up.  This resulted in the Dow taking 25 years to achieve breakeven status with 1929.  However, stocks that were not part of the index can be seen to achieve breakeven status on average by 1937.  One of our favorite examples is found in the chart of Monsanto Corp. below (2010 article found here).

Continue reading

Review: Lowry’s 90% Downside Days

On January 28, 2014, Barry Ritholtz did a Bloomberg piece titled “Friday was a 90/90 Day and What It Means (found here)”.  In that article, Ritholtz explains the “90/90” as follows:

“When markets experience a bout of intense selling -- those trading sessions when 90 percent of the volume is down, and nine out of 10 stocks close lower -- it can mark a short-term reversal in a bull run. Typically, it signifies a shift in psychology among larger institutions.”

“Looking at the past examples of deep 90/90 sell offs, we have seen only modest rebounds followed by more selling after days such as Friday.”

In general, Ritholtz gives a vague idea on the concept however a detailed explanation is found in the 2002 article by Paul Desmond of Lowry’s Reports titled “Identifying Bear Market Bottoms and New Bull Markets (found here).”  In the Desmond article, there are some key concepts that are outlined.  Foremost is the idea that “…Important market bottoms are preceded by, and result from, important market declines…(page 3)” and “…if an investor had a method for identifying and measuring panic selling, at least half the job of spotting major market bottoms would be at hand...(page 3)”.

In the pursuit of identifying and measuring panic selling, Desmond’s research found that “…almost all periods of significant market decline in the past 69 years have contained at least one, and usually more than one, day of panic selling in which Downside Volume equaled 90.0% or more of the total of Upside Volume plus Downside Volume, and Points Lost equaled 90.0% or more of the total of Points Gained plus Points Lost…(page 4)”.  Desmond’s work on the topic covers the period from 1960 to 2002 with every date that the Dow Jones Industrial Average experiences 90% Upside or Downside days.

Continue reading

Dow Theory: Downside Targets

It has been almost two months since our last Dow Theory posting.  This is as it should be, since Dow Theory does not require a daily accounting of changes to the market.   As indicated in Robert Rhea’s The Dow Theory:

“There are three movements of the averages, all of which may be in progress at one and the same time.  The first, and most important, is the primary trend: the broad upward or downward movements known as bull or bear markets, which may be of several years’ duration.  The second, and most deceptive movement, is the secondary reaction: an important decline in a primary bull market or rally in a primary bear market.  These reactions usually last from three weeks to as many months.  The third, and usually unimportant, movement is the daily fluctuation.” (source: Rhea, Robert. The Dow Theory. Barron’s, New York. 1932. Page 32.)

Continue reading

Downside Targets for Gold

The prevailing controversy, among gold bugs, is whether or not gold stocks have bottomed.  As our Gold Stock Indicator has indicated, so far, gold stocks have a long way to go before reaching lows similar to what occurred in 2008, on a relative basis.  This debate about gold stocks only arise out of the fact that they have fallen so much while the price of gold has been “stable.”

Continue reading

Technical Review: Carbo Ceramics (CRR)

Carbo Ceramics (CRR) was one of the companies that appeared at the top of our dividend watch list for many weeks beginning in February 2012. The watch list served as a beginning point for our research and we took a position in August (found here) at $65.02 (green arrow on chart below). Within three months, we saw shares of CRR rally to $74, a +13.8% gain. As such, we ‘hedged’ our position by selling the principal (found here) and let the profit run (red arrow on chart below).

Recent activity in Carbo Ceramics price suggests that, on a technical basis, the decline is over. Though a rally to its intraday peak of $180 is not expected, we believed there is a good opportunity for those interested in a short to medium-term speculative position in the stock.

image

In our view, the biggest bull case, on a technical basis, is that the 50-day moving average has crossed above the 150-day moving average creating what some call a "golden cross." We rely on the 150-day versus the more popular 200-day moving average for the fact that it is the road less traveled and provides an indication ahead of the crowd.

Currently, shares of Carbo Ceramics are trading just above the 50-day moving average, making this an ideal short-term transaction. For those who wish to trade this generally significant technical pattern, we’d consider selling if shares close below the 150-day moving average or if the stock gains +10% or more.

From a fundamental standpoint, Carbo Ceramics (CRR) provides long-term holders of the stock with the following attributes:

  • According to Value Line Investment Survey, the fair value for CRR is 14 times 2012 cash flow of $6.50, or a stock price of $91, a gain of +14% above the current price of $79.64. As an alternative, if the estimates by Value Line are correct, the 2013 fair value figure is $100.10, a potential gain of +25.69%.
  • Value Line indicates that Carbo Ceramics has increased the dividend for 12 consecutive years in a row.
  • Carbo Ceramics book value has had an annualized growth rate of +14.73%.
  • Carbo Ceramics has no debt

What Is the Downside Risk If I Want to Hold CRR for the Long-Term?

Dow Theory has the following downside targets for Carbo Ceramics:

  • $61.34
  • $44.39
  • $27.43

Based on the work of Edson Gould, Carbo Ceramics has the following Altimeter:

CRR 1-14-2013

Carbo Ceramics would have to fall to $70.20 in order to be considered a buy using the Altimeter above. However, as has been the case in the past, seldom does the Altimeter decline to the buy level and then immediately reverse to the upside. therefore we’d expect a push below the $70.20 level for good measure.

image

Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines have $65 as the downside support level.

The most conservative of the three downside targets mentioned above is the Dow Theory level of $61. This seems be the most appropriate level to consider a first, or second, purchase if the desire is to hold Carbo Ceramics for the long-term.

Edson Gould’s SRL: Chipotle Mexican Grill Downside Target Update

In a series of articles examining Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL), we put some big name stocks to the test.  The test was to see if Gould’s SRL had any reasonable predictive ability to determine the downside targets for the stocks in question.  The results have been astounding and are well worth your careful consideration.

First, we will review the SRLs for Netflix (NFLX) and Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) and the outcome of the analysis related to Gould’s indicator.  Next, we will review the updated Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) downside target.

The first stock that we applied the SRLs to was Netflix (NFLX) on December 3, 2010.  At that time, NFLX was trading at $205.90.  When the stock rose to the eventual peak of $298.73, we thought that maybe the SRL was a waste of effort.

However, almost one year to the day after we ran the SRL on Netflix, the stock had broke through our conservative downside target of $117.76.  Even more amazing, NFLX later declined below the extreme downside target that we set at $68.63.  Today Netflix trades at $66.56.  Because we’re not short-sellers, we did not take any position on the decline of the stock.  However, we were able to buy the stock at $62 and sell the stock at $100 in the subsequent rebound from the initial low.

The next stock that we applied the SRL to was Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) in our October 25, 2011 review of Edson Gould’s formula.  At the time, GMCR was trading at $64.75 after declining –42% from the peak in the stock price on September 19, 2011.  There were some who said that the stock was a bargain and should be bought.  However, Gould’s SRL indicated that at minimum, GMCR was to decline to $59.93 and possibly decline to the $37.21 level.

In a May 2, 2012 revision of Gould’s SRL for Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR), when the stock was trading at $28.50, we suggested that the stock could trade down to $22.53 with and additional downside target of $8.30.  Today GMCR trades at $22.13 (see chart above).

In the same October 25, 2011 review of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, we covered Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG).  At that time, Gould’s indicator suggested that CMG had a conservative downside target of $200.59 and an extreme downside target of $114.16.  As we’ve indicated in the past, SRLs are based based on the highest price the stock attains. In this case, CMG rose as much as +45.70% since our October 25, 2011 article.  Below is the revised SRL for CMG.

image

Based on the high of $440.40, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a conservative downside target of $233.23 and an extreme downside target of $146.80.  We’re cautious about anyone who suggests that CMG is a “good buy” or “undervalued” at the current price. Already, we’re within striking distance of the $233.23 conservative downside target as CMG trades at $280.93 after hedge fund manager David Einhorn recently recommended selling the stock short (article found here).  If past use of SRL is any indication, when CMG declines below the upward trending conservative downside line, you can be assured that the stock will hit $233.

Again, our purpose of using SRLs to determine the downside risk of a stock that we’d like to buy but don’t want to chase.  We’re willing to wait for the eventual decline or admit that we missed the boat on a great investment opportunity.  Again, we don’t sell stocks short because we’re interested in acquiring great companies at the best price possible.

Disclaimer: This piece is a continuation of the examination of Edson Gould's speed resistance line as explained in prior articles. This is not an endorsement to sell short at the current levels nor buy these stocks once falling below the extreme downside targets since the stocks have been randomly selected, at best.

Dow Theory: Downside Prospects

We have indicated in our August 2, 2011 posting (found here) the fact that we are now in a bear market.  According to Dow Theory, the primary trend remains in place until the opposite indication has been signaled.  This is best described by Richard Russell in the following remark:

…the Dow Theorist has learned that the last trend should be considered to remain in effect until the contrary has been proved”[1].

We believe that there has not been a reversal of this bear market indication as outlined in our August 7, 2012 Dow Theory analysis (found here).

Despite getting a bear market signal only days earlier, on August 9, 2011 we indicated that a bear market rally (found here) was likely to take place.  Our work on the topic of Dow Theory at that time indicated that there was upside potential to go as far as the prior highs (12,807.51).  From the August 9th low, the Dow Industrials rose as high as 13,338.70, or +23.38%.

From our experience on the topic, bear markets usually connote declines of -30% or more.  However, the bear market that we’ve experienced so far can be characterized from a slight dip to a nice market run to the upside.  While the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Dow Jones Transportation Average have diverged overall, there has been nothing that we’ve seen since August 2, 2011 to make a person feel like any confidence in the indication.  After all, it has been over a year since the signal and no real fireworks.  Was it really worth reducing market exposure for a non-event?

Since this bull market move began on March 9, 2009, there have been sizable declines of -14% or more in 2010 and 2011 before the stock market continued higher.  The best we can do at this point is assume that 2012 is due for a correction in line with the two previous years and see what the downside prospects might be.

period of decline Dow Industrials % change
April 26, 2010-July 2, 2010 -14.60%
May 2, 2011-October 3, 2011 -19.19%
May 1, 2012-???? -2.09%
   
   
period of decline Dow Transports % change
May 3, 2010-July 6, 2010 -18.72%
July 7, 2011-October 3, 2011 -28.11%
March 15, 2012-???? -6.39%

Because a bear market decline of -30% or more has not taken place, the best we can do is assume that a similar decline to 2010 and 2011 is the most likely outcome…for now.  The previous declines, within the context of a bull market, have averaged –16.90% for the Dow Industrials and –23.42% for the Dow Transports. 

If the Industrials were to decline from the current level by –16.90% it would fall to 11,035.12.  If the Transports were to decline from the current level by –23.42% it would fall to 4,096.84.

As described in our Dow Theory analysis from August 7, 2012 (found here), there are two overhanging non-confirmations of a bull market.  This means that the overall trend of the Industrials and Transports should eventually be down.  In our negative bias against an new bull market, particular emphasis is weighted against the Transportation Index which has been falling while the Industrial Index has been rising.

However, the last week of August has provide the Dow Industrial Average with what we consider a double-top.  Although not the most classic double top, it is still a double top. 

image

Double tops and double bottoms were indicated to be very important formations according to Charles H. Dow.  Alternatively, William Peter Hamilton and Robert Rhea arrived at the conclusion that such formations bear little importance when considering the price movement of the indexes.

From our own work on the topic of double tops and double bottoms, we have found that Dow was right about the importance of such a price characteristics and have been able to prove, with significant evidence throughout the history of the Dow indexes, that double tops and double bottoms are critical indicators for determining market direction when applying Dow Theory. 

In this case, a double tops mean that the direction for the stock market is down.  Since the bear market signal, based on Dow Theory, hasn’t resulted in a decline of over -30% for either the Transports or Industrials, were proposing that at the very minimum a decline of 13%–15% should be expected.

[1] Russell, Richard. Richard Russell’s Dow Theory Letters. Issue 166. December 27, 1961. page 1.

Dow Jones Industrial Average: Where To Now?

Dow Theory Review

  • On August 2, 2011 (article here), we said that a new bear market had begun.
  • On August 9, 2011 (article here), we announced that, based on the closing price of August 8, 2011, a bear market rally would ensue (stock prices would rise.)  That call was 2 months ahead of the ultimate market bottom set in October 2011 and off the actual low by 1.43%.
  • On March 16, 2012 (article here), we warned about the lack of participation of most stocks in the rise of the stock market from the 2009 low.  Additionally, we cited the divergence between the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Dow Jones Transportation Average as confirmation that we were still in a bear market.  This was less than 1% from the actual top in the market.
  • On May 19, 2012 (article here), we pronounced that the bear market rally had ended.  This call came 7.41% below the actual peak in the market on May 1, 2012.

Charting a Path for the Dow

Now comes the challenge of determining the downside targets for the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  To accomplish this task, we’ve gone back to the secular bear markets of 1906-1924 and 1966-1982 for some insight as to what might occur going forward.  It is important to understand that the signature of a secular bear market is that it will not increase very much above the initial peak and declines significantly below the initial peak multiple times.

In the chart below, we have the price action of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1906 to 1924.

image

In the chart below, we have the price action of the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1966 to 1982.

image

There is considerable debate about where the peak of the current secular bear market began.  Although we believe that the secular trend began at the 2007 peak,  we’re being conservative by considering that the most recent secular bear market began at the 2000 peak, as represented in the chart below.

image

Beneath each trough is the number corresponding to the major declines within the secular bear market. In each chart there are at least three major market declines while the peaks remain in close proximity to the original market peak.

It is our view that the first decline of the Dow Jones Industrial Average in the secular bear market trend later becomes a minimum downside target.  In the current market, we believe that the Dow Jones Industrial Average will revisit the 8,200 level.  If the Industrials were to revisit the 8,200 level, the total decline would be approximately -32% from the closing price of June 1, 2012.

Dow Theory: Bear Market Downside Target

On August 2, 2011, we received what is widely understood to be a Dow Theory bear market indication. According to Dow Theory, a bear market indication shall remain in place until counteracted by a bullish indication. The middle ground, where there is not a new bear market confirmation nor a new bull market signal, is generally considered a range or a “line.”

On August 9, 2011, we presented what we believed to be bear market rally targets according to Dow Theory. In the comment section of that same article, we revised the bear market rally targets based on the low of the Dow Industrials set on August 10, 2011.

The first bear market rally target, which seems next to impossible for the Dow Industrials to stay above, is 11,416.80. This level was only the first of five upside targets that would need to be breached for any prospect that a renewed cyclical bull market is in the works.

A confirmation of the bear market would be signaled if the Dow Industrials and Dow Transports were to fall below 10,719.94 and 4,149.94, respectively.

According to Dow Theory, we are still in a bear market and the early unconfirmed indications are that we may be headed to the 9,686.48 level.