Category Archives: Edson Gould

Netflix: Downside Targets

Review

On December 3, 2010, we ran the numbers for Netflix,based on the work of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines, to determine what the downside risk might be for the stock.  The projected downside targets are illustrated below:

Not long afterwards, Netflix stock price soared from $185.45 to $300.  However, the goal of our site is to determine downside risk and the rise in the stock price of was of little interest.  Our view is that if we missed an investment opportunity then we will consider investing only if the stock declines to any of the anticipated downside targets.

image 

Naturally, there was considerable opportunity that we missed on the way from $185 to $300.  However, our rule is to seek values and from our experience all quality companies become undervalued at some point. Finally and for numerous reasons, Netflix declined from the peak of $300 to as low as $53.80.  Naturally, we were able to pick up shares of Netflix at $62, a price we felt was reasonable at the time.  Our critical review of the downside targets allows us to accept our purchases for the long-term in case we happen to be wrong about the short-term upside prospects.

October 15, 2014: Netflix Downside Targets

Quick Take: GoPro Downside Targets

We’re fascinated with the news surrounding GoPro (GPRO).  The stock went public on June 26, 2014 at $24 per share and has since increase in price to $89.93 as of October 8, 2014.  As public offerings go, the rise in price is considered a success.  As recently as October 7, 2014, Barclays raised their price target for GPRO from $45 to $60, in spite of the fact that the stock is already trading well above the new target price.  It seems that Barclays doesn’t want to appear over anxious to recommend the stock even though they are not confirming their expectation for the stock to decline.

Continue reading

Quick Take: Consolidated Edison

“The valuation problem is far from academic: In recent years, some huge-scale frauds and near-frauds have been facilitated by derivatives trades. In the energy and electric utility sectors, for example, companies used derivatives and trading activities to report great ‘earnings’ – until the roof fell in when they actually tried to convert the derivatives-related receivables on their balance sheets into cash. ‘Mark-to-market’ then turned out to be truly ‘mark-to-myth.’”

Buffett, Warren. Berkshire Hathaway. 2002 Letter to Shareholders. February 21, 2003.

Berkshire Hathaway: 10-year Price Projections

In our May 6, 2012 posting on Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) titled “Should Berkshire Hathaway Be Trading at 1995 Prices?”, we gave price projections based on Edson Gould’s Altimeter using very conservative estimates if BRK-A paid a dividend.  As we’ve managed to achieve the middle of the three upside targets set down in our 2012 article, we’re going to list the price that we think BRK-A would be considered undervalued for each of the next 10 years.

Apple meets NLO Upside Target

On August 19, 2014, Apple (AAPL) stock price rose as high as $100.66.  When Apple was trading at $61.61 on March 9, 2013, we said the following with the accompanying chart:

“Apple Inc. (AAPL) is at the top of our watch list as it is within 5% of the one year low.  In our April 14, 2012 test of the quality of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance lines, Apple fell from $636 [adjusted price of $90.85] to our projected level of $424.15 [adjusted price of $60.59] (found here).  Now that the stock has achieved our downside target, we expected that a reaction to the upside is likely.”

image

On July 17, 2013, when Apple was trading at $61.47, we re-affirmed our view of the upside potential for Apple with the following commentary:

“Currently, Apple is demonstrating a basing pattern that if successful, could result in a breakout to the upside.  At the current levels, we wouldn’t be opposed to buying some shares of Apple with the expectation that the stock could decline an additional –25% to –35%.”

The work of Edson Gould has proven to be astounding when considered in its context.  On April 14, 2012, we posted an article titled “Considering the Downside Prospects for Apple”.  At that time, we were revising the previous estimates of downside risk done on February 5, 2012 (third party source available here).

What was mentioned on February 5, 2012 is critical to understanding how Edson Gould’s downside projections work.  At the time, we said:

“The very first thing that we look for, to determine speed resistance lines, is the most recent peak in the price. Because AAPL is continually making new highs, we only need to use the latest price of $455.68 [post split price of $65.09] as our starting point….As the price of Apple increases, so too does the SRL lines based on the work of Edson Gould.”

This means that as long as the price of the stock increases to a new high the speed resistance lines are expected to increase as well.  Only when the stock starts on a declining trend can we expect that the stock price might go to the conservative and extreme downside targets.

image

On April 14, 2012, when Apple was trading at $90.89 (pre-split price of $636.23), we said the following:

“…we believe that, based on the current speed resistance lines, no one would expect Apple to decline to our conservative downside target of $424 (post split price of $60.57)...”

The strength of Gould’s downside risk estimates is that we didn’t even have the peak price of $100.71 set on September 18, 2012 but we were still able to see the conservative downside target of $60.57 achieved.  Had we used the peak price, we would have achieved the $67.14 conservative downside target much earlier than the $60.57 level.

Berkshire Hathaway Meets NLO Target

On May 6, 2012, we proposed that Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) was trading at a price that was well below its true value.  At the time, BRK-A was trading at $164,990 per share.  However, we proposed that Berkshire Hathaway should have been selling at much higher prices with upside targets of $175k, $197k and $219k in a 2-3 year timeframe.  As BRK-A sits within 1% of our mid-range target of $197,190 after two years, we believe it is time to reassess where Berkshire Hathaway sits within the context of Edson Gould’s Altimeter.

Nu Skin Meets Our Downside Target

On January 16, 2014 at 8:40am EST, we said the following of Nu Skin Enterprises (NUS):

“If the stock closes below $79.28 then the price should vacillate at or below the rising conservative SRL in the medium-term.  If the stock manages to close above the $79.28 level then the upside target is $118.92.  Additionally, the extreme downside target of $46.83 is just on the horizon.  In theory, this stock should achieve the extreme downside level before hardened speculators will jump in.”

On August 6, 2014, NUS declined as low as $43.50 and closed at $46.52.  An updated Speed Resistance Line is included below:

image

NUS has met our January 2014 call for the extreme downside target of $46.83.  It is at this point that NUS becomes interesting to hardened speculators.  Based on Gould’s SRL, NUS has an upside targets of $82.73 and $118.92. 

Dow Altimeter Review

As the Dow Industrials meander near all-time highs, it is necessary to review Edson Gould’s Altimeter for the index.

Continue reading

Gold: Reassessing the Risks

On March 3, 2013, we said the following about the downside prospects for gold (article and chart found here):

“The prevailing controversy, among gold bugs, is whether or not gold stocks have bottomed.  As our Gold Stock Indicator has indicated, so far, gold stocks have a long way to go before reaching lows similar to what occurred in 2008, on a relative basis.  This debate about gold stocks only arise out of the fact that they have fallen so much while the price of gold has been ‘stable.’

“However, when the price of gold is viewed from the perspective of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL), we see that there is a lot room for gold to move to the downside.

“We can’t be certain that the price of gold has any further to fall. However, our experience with the work of Edson Gould cannot be ignored.  We’ll have to assume that if gold breaks below $1,531 then it would be wise to build $1,179.25 into our expectations.”

The above commentary was based on the March 1, 2013 price of gold.  Since that time, gold has declined from  $1,582.25 to slightly above Edson Gould’s ascending conservative downside target at $1,195.25 on December 20, 2013.  This was within 1.35% of the estimated target.  Additionally, gold stocks as represented by the XAU Index declined –37.72%.  Below is our updated review on the price of gold.

Continue reading

iShares Biotechnology Downside Targets

“…provided the secondary reaction can be assumed to have run its normal course, which should be somewhere between 33 per cent and 66 per cent of the total primary advance attained since the last preceding important secondary reaction.”

Rhea, Robert. The Dow Theory. Barron’s. 1932. page 58.

Bitcoin: Downside Targets Met

On December 18, 2013 (found here), we gave an assessment of the downside risk for Bitcoin in the following commentary:

“With the conservative downside target being achieved, the extreme downside target of $412.65 and the worst case level of $152.83 are all that remains.”

On February 8, 2014 (found here), we reiterated downside targets for Bitcoin:

“In many previous examples of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines, once at the extreme downside target of $412.65, the price usually reverses to the upside.  However, failure to do so (reverse at or above the extreme downside target) would mean that Bitcoin could reach $385 before reversing to the upside.  If the $385 level fails on the downside then $200 is assured.”

As we speak, Bitcoin sits at the $246 level. 

image

The data that we’re using to plot the price is from Mt. Gox (found here).  However, Mt. Gox has put withdrawals on hold until security issues are resolve.  Because Mt. Gox put withdrawals on hold they likely avoided illegal activities like the most recent hack afflicting Silk Road 2 as reported by Techcrunch.com

While there are other Bitcoin exchanges offering higher bid and ask prices, they cannot avoid the reality of the problems that currently plague the Bitcoin market.  Leaving aside the possible arbitrage opportunity, Mt. Gox offers up the most extreme and negative price data and appears to be protecting their constituents.  These are necessary attributes that make the data being offered by Mt. Gox most realistic and applicable to our attempt at analysis.

In the final review, either the other Bitcoin exchanges will drop to the quoted Mt. Gox level or Mt. Gox quotes will rise appreciably.  Regardless, at the current level of $300-$200, Bitcoin is fairly valued.

Anyone venturing into the world of Bitcoin for the purposes of speculation should assume that all funds put forth will be lost.

Bitcoin: Retests Downside Targets

On December 18, 2013, we said the following of Bitcoin (found here):

“…in the last 24 hours, Bitcoin has declined as low as $455.  This suggests there there could be a significant appreciation from the current level as the conservative downside target has been achieved.”

The rise in Bitcoin from the low of $455 by +123% in less that one month seemed substantial enough.  However, the recent declines in Bitcoin require us to reassess the potential risks and rewards going forward.

image 

In the last few days, Bitcoin has experienced extreme volatility in its price when it fell -32.7% from the intermediate peak experienced on January 5, 2014 at $1,015. We’re now faced with the potential for Bitcoin to achieve the ascending downside target of $412.65 (now at approximately $570) followed by the worst case level of $200 (ascending red line). 

In many previous examples of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines, once at the extreme downside target of $412.65, the price usually reverses to the upside.  However, failure to do so (reverse at or above the extreme downside target) would mean that Bitcoin could reach $385 before reversing to the upside.  If the $385 level fails on the downside then $200 is assured.

Finally, the extreme upside target is $1,606.95 and the conservative upside target is $1,071.30.  These upside targets are only valid if the price of Bitcoin is on the rise above the $412.65 ascending line. 

***Anyone venturing into the world of Bitcoin for the purposes of speculation should assume that all funds put forth will be lost.

Best Buy Downside Targets

Below is a chart of Best Buy (BBY) downside targets based on Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL):

Continue reading

Nu Skin Enterprises Upside and Downside Targets

Below is a chart of Nu Skin (NUS) downside targets based on Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL):

Continue reading

Bitcoin: Downside and Upside Targets

On November 19, 2013, we provided our best estimates of what the downside and upside targets were for Bitcoin (found here).  In our assessment, we said the following:

“Our conservative downside target for Bitcoin, based on the peak closing price of $785.50 is $384.83.  The extreme downside target is $261.83.  The worst case scenario is for Bitcoin to fall as low as $152.83 as indicated by the red line on the chart.

As we’ve written many pieces on the topic of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Line, we’ve made some observations that we think should be highlighted at this time.  For the first time, we’re going to provide what we believe might be an upside target.  In the case of Bitcoin, the next conservative upside target is $1,154.49 if the most recent peak of $785.50 is exceeded.  This is a tentative estimate based on observations of the many successful downside SRLs that we have run in the past.  We’ll be on the lookout for what may come next.”

The most updated Bitcoin chart demonstrates the value of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines’ ability to give informed estimates of upside and downside targets.  In the case of Bitcoin, The upside target was achieved and exceeded by 7.23%.  After achieving the upside target, Bitcoin has declined from the recent peak of $1237.96 down to the conservative downside target of $535.65.  The conservative downside target is based on the updated peak in the price for Bitcoin using the guidelines for Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines.

image

With the conservative downside target being achieved, the extreme downside target of $412.65 and the worst case level of $152.83 are all that remains.  However, in the last 24 hours, Bitcoin has declined as low as $455.  This suggests there there could be a significant appreciation from the current level as the conservative downside target has been achieved.  Our revised upside target is now $1,606.95.

Those willing accept the extreme volatility and political risk should seriously consider Bitcoin at or below the $412.65 ascending line with a willingness to see a decline of –62.96%.