Category Archives: Edson Gould

Virgin Galactic Downside Targets

Below are the downside targets for Virgin Galactic Holdings (SPCE).

image

  • $25.54 (conservative target)
  • $19.85 (mid-range target)
  • $14.16 (extreme target)

Virgin Galactic Holdings (SPCE) is creating a scenario where the extreme downside target could easily be achieved while being considered a normal “bounce.” The price would have to rise to above $60 before the above downside targets are no longer valid.

These situations don’t end well but in case the price doubles from the recent peak we provide the following downside targets.

  • $39.71 (conservative target)
  • $34.02 (mid-range target)
  • $28.33 (extreme target)

Palladium Downside Targets

In reviewing the price history of Palladium and in light of the most recent parabolic increase, we have outlined the current increase in the price and compare it to the 1996-2003 rise and decline.

1996-2003

In the period from 1996 to 2004, the price of Palladium increased +837% and subsequently declined from the peak by -86.05%.

image

The chart above includes the Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) based on the work of Edson Gould.  In this specific instance, the price of Palladium declined through all of the downside targets.  In addition, the continued until it reached a low of approximately $150.50 or -58% below the $359.67 Speed Resistance Line.

In the following review of the most recent increase in Palladium, we’ll compare the 2016-2020 run-up to the increase from 1996 to 2001 to identify the signs of what might come in the price going forward.

Then v. Now

image

image

Technically Speaking

When looking at the price of Palladium in both periods, we have identified the most important points contributing to our analysis.

The start to our review is the first intermediate peak after the low.   In the case of the 1996-2004 period, that first peak was at $397.50.  For the period of 2016-2020, that peak was $1,119.90.  The subsequent lows that followed, $272.20 and $877.80, helped to establish the downside targets.

Worth noting is the decline from the initial peaks to slightly below the mid-range downside targets before a continuation of the rising trend to the second intermediate peaks at $718.50 and $1,520.35, respectively.  In both cases, the decline from the second intermediate peaks are situated around the conservative downside targets at $631.87 and $1,627.93.

In both cases, the parabolic move ensues after the second intermediate peak, which is a considerable distance from the level of the conservative downside target.

Conclusion

Because of the precedent set in the period from 1996 to 2001, we expect that the conservative downside target of $1,627.93 will be achieved. 

We could consider it luck if the price of Palladium were to decline to the mid-range level of $1,189.03 or the extreme target of $750.13.  However, if the period from 1996 to 2003 is truly a precedent setting period then it would not be surprising to see Palladium decline to $750.13 as a normal reaction to the parabolic increase.

Palladium Goes Parabolic

The price of palladium has increased significantly since 2016.

image

Naturally, parabolic peaks mean that the price is nearing a top.  The downside prospects are the only clear consideration at this point in time.  Below are the downside targets for the Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) that we have generated based on the most recent peak. Continue reading

AeroVironment: Upside Resistance Targets

On September 14, 2018, we said the following of the downside targets for AeroVironment (AVAV), when the stock was trading at $116.24:

“The conservative downside target of $62.26 is a lock in our view.  To put this in perspective, AVAV would have to increase to $160.62 before the $62.26 level isn’t a normal ‘dip.’”

image

The numbers we based our downside targets on was with the assumption that AVAV could rise as high as $160.62, for a reasonable margin of error.  Instead, AVAV peaked only two trading days later at $119.83 (the above chart has been adjusted to the peak).

The decline in AVAV has seen the stock fall as low as $49.54 on August 27, 2019, a drop of –58.65%.  The most important element of the current decline is the ability of the stock price to remedy the preceding parabolic move.  A drop of nearly-60% comes very close to fixing the previous disparity in the price.

image

From the August low, AVAV has managed to rally to the latest price at $61.81.  The power of the reversal is highlighted in the fact that the stock price rose from the $49.54 level then achieved the $63.59 price.  From the $63.59, the stock declined but could not achieve a price lower than $49.54.

The upside resistance levels are as follows:

  • $84.69
  • $96.63
  • $108.23

Speculators (as opposed to Investors) should take these levels to be the points when the continuation of the upside will reverse to the prior low, as a re-test.  Investors, basing their assessment on the fundamentals, can strategically enter positions breaking their intended investments in thirds or halves.

Review: GE Upside Targets

History:

  • On January 21 2018, when General Electric (GE) was trading around $16, we said, “the speed at which the current decline is taking place indicates that sentiment will push the stock to the $5.27 price and the elimination from the Dow Jones Industrial Average is eminent.”
  • On December 12, 2018, General Electric (GE) achieved a closing low of $6.45, 22% above our estimated downside target.
  • On January 1, 2019, when General Electric was trading around $7.25, we said, “…now is the time to consider the upside resistance targets.  The above chart lays bare the expectations for an upside move.” We also said, “The year 2019 could be forgiving to GE…” This was 12.40% above the December 12, 2018 low.
  • On November 21, 2019, the closing price of General Electric stood at $11.59 or +59.86% above the January 1, 2019 level. This was 84.44% of the entire run from the December 12, 2018 closing low.

Revised GE Upside Targets

After demonstrating a history of consistency, in terms of the general trend in the stock price of General Electric, we must revise the Speed Resistance Lines that were issued in January 1, 2019 to more accurately reflect the changes that have occurred in the last 11 months.

image

The upside resistance targets are as follows:

  • $19.05 (conservative target)
  • $23.33 (mid-range target)
  • $27.48 (extreme target)

It would be a major coup for the price of General Electric to exceed the conservative upside resistance target at $19.05.  For now, we will reiterate that almost all stocks achieve the conservative targets through either the passage of time or increase/decrease in price.

As was said in January 2019, “GE could achieve all of the designated upside resistance targets and still be in a declining trend.”

Anheuser-Busch InBev SRL

In our previous work, we have outlined the impact of dividends and the historical precedent related to the qualitative elements of Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD).  Why have we put so much focus on ONLY one fundamental element as it relates to a stock and its future prospects.  As stated by Geraldine Weiss in her book Dividends Don’t Lie:

“The philosophy that the dividend yield of a quality company can reveal volumes about a stock’s future performance does not lend itself merely to a certain tax climate or a particular market cycle.  It is a basic principal. one that serves as a faithful guide through even the most confounding stock market phases (page 10).”

Many argue that such a narrow perspective on esoteric points regarding the dividend doesn’t tell the whole story.  Our writing on this topic since calling the bull market in 2009, and starting this site, highlights the exceptional consistency of the perspective that we have offered.

Price Reveals Fundamentals, Fundamentals Reveal Price

According to Charles H. Dow, co-founder of the Wall Street Journal and creator of the indexes that bear his name:

"The one sure thing in speculation is that values determine prices in the long run. Manipulation is effective temporarily, but the investor establishes price in the end.  The object of all speculation is to foresee coming changes in values. Whoever knows that the value of a stock has run ahead of price and is likely to be sustained can buy that stock with confidence that as its value is recognized by investors, the price will rise (Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook.  Wall Street Journal. February 25, 1902.)."

With this in mind, we will venture into the indication that are provided by the activity of the price for Anheuser-Busch InBev.

Downside Speed Resistance Lines

Below are the Downside Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) covering the period from July 2009 to November 2019.

image

The downside targets based on the data from 2009 to the present are:

  • $94.20 (conservative)
  • $69.34 (mid-range)
  • $44.48 (extreme)

We can see that BUD has managed to decline through the conservative and mid-range targets. All that remains is the extreme downside target of between $44.48 and $47.70.  The lack of historical precedent does not allow for the richer analysis of the price that we’d normally like to do.  Such analysis makes for what we believe would be better interpretation of the price activity.

Three Steps Rule

In addition to Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines, there is the theory of the Three Steps Rule.  According to Gould:

Our Three Step Rule (not to be confused with our Three Step and Stumble Rule, Which refers only to monetary conditions) has been helpful over the years in our attempt to project stock market moves and to anticipate stock market tops and bottoms.

Our Three Step Rule says: In any stock market move, up or down, large or small or in between, expect three steps but be prepared for a fourth.

It applies to large moves as well as small moves.

Three steps up in an advancing market and three steps down in a declining market usually exhaust the bullish potential accumulated at the bottoms and the bearish potential accumulated at tops- but sometimes there is a fourth step (Edson Gould Reports. Edson Gould’s 1975 Forecast. November, 1974. page 8. ).

We have included, in the chart above, the Three Steps (red circles).  In this case, the third “step” cannot occur unless it is at some point below the second “step.”

Upside Speed Resistance Lines

Below are the Upside Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) covering the period from September 2016 to November 2019.

image

The upside targets based on the data from 2016 to the present are:

  • $99.44
  • $111.00
  • $122.22

As with downside prospects there must be upside resistance.  From the all-time low set in late 2018, BUD has managed to climb as high as $101.58.  However, not achieving the $111.00 upside resistance and then falling below the $99.44 upside resistance level suggests, at minimum, a re-test of the $65.43 level.

Speed Resistance Lines are based on the work of Edson Gould who was famous for precisely calling market tops and bottoms and widely quoted in Barron’s throughout the 1970’s.  How powerful are the indications provided by Gould’s SRL?

Among the many posting we have on the topic, our April 26, 2012 on the downside risk for Chesapeake Energy (CHK) titled “A Warning for Chesapeake Shareholders” suggested that although the stock was trading at $18.10, CHK could potentially decline as low $0.67 as a normal reaction to the prior peak.  On November 12, 2019, CHK had a closing price of $0.67.

Netflix Downside Targets

Below are the downside targets for Netflix (NFLX).

Roku Inc. Downside Targets

Below are the downside targets for Roku Inc. (ROKU).

image

Our experience with all Speed Resistance Lines is that the conservative target is going to be achieved, no matter the reason.  The targets are as follows:

  • $83.79 (conservative target)
  • $70.21 (mid-range target)
  • $56.62 (extreme target)

Crude Oil: Price Targets

Below are the upside and downside targets based on the work of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines. Continue reading

Tesla Motors: On the Ropes?

On May 22, 2019, Citi analyst Itay Michaeli suggested that Tesla Motors (TSLA) could decline as low at $36.

image

Meanwhile, on May 21, 2019,  Morgan Stanley has put a decline to $10 on the stock price into play.

image

Our work of September 8, 2018 laid bare the technical attributes that were likely outcomes for Tesla Motors.  The upside of using technical indications is that it leaves out the narrative and only includes precedent, both positive and negative.

In that 2018 posting, we offered two types of technical review, Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) as outlined by Edson Gould and “Three Peaks and a Domed Housed (3PDh) as presented by George Lindsay.

Already, Tesla has achieved the $200.17 price target that was set by the SRL analysis.  We’re curious to see if the $76 target is achieve as outlined in the 3PDh analysis.

As a reiteration of the more conservative downside analysis from September 8, 2018:

“The extreme downside target of $128.33 would be the last stop before a retest of the $100 level.  In all the prior history of stocks that we’ve tracked using the SRL, 80% eventually go back to the extreme downside target before the bottom drops out or the stock attains new highs.  Based on this observation, we’re highly confident that given the nature of Tesla, declining to the $150 to $127 level is a lock.”

Texas Pacific Land Trust Downside Targets

In the period from October 3, 2018 to November 23, 2018, the price of Texas Pacific Land Trust (TPL) has declined from a recent high of $871.99 to the current level of $551.99, a decline of –36.69%.  The question on everyone’s mind is, “how low will the price go?”

Using past as precedent, we looked at the Speed Resistance Lines [SRL] as outlined by Edson Gould in the period from 2003 to 2016.  First, we remind our readers that under the extraordinary period of panic, from June 29, 2007 to March 9, 2009, TPL saw a decline of -72%.

Using the 2009 low, we see the $25.65 level as the pivot and the $230.82 level as the parabolic peak.  Those points give us the following SRLs:

  • $102.59 (conservative target)
  • $89.77 (mid-range target)
  • $76.64 (extreme target)

image

The entire decline was –53.87% and saw the price of TPL achieve the conservative downside target of $102.59 and with the passage of time the price almost accomplished the $89.77 mid-range target.

Fast forward to November 23, 2018 where we see the peak of TPL at $871.99.  If we allow for only the conservative downside target to be achieved then TPL will go as low as $397.12.  However, remember back in December 9, 2010 when we said, in an article titled “Real Estate: The Verdict is In,” “…we feel that real estate has a six to nine year stretch of rising prices or ‘trading’ in a range and decreased foreclosures.”

“…we feel that real estate has a six to nine year stretch of rising prices or ‘trading’ in a range and decreased foreclosures.”

Since our prescient article in 2010, in the face of shadow inventory claims that were supposed to keep prices down, we have seen a clear rising trend in the price of real estate and a significant decrease in foreclosures.  Now, with the passage of 8 years, we believe that TPL will push the limits of downside action and achieve the extreme downside target as seen in the chart below. Continue reading

Facebook Downside Targets

Below are the downside targets for Facebook (FB) based on the decline from the July 25, 2018 peak at $217.50. Continue reading

Apple Inc. Downside Targets

On April 14, 2012, we provided the following downside targets for Apple Inc. (AAPL):

pre-split price post-split price
$424.15 $60.59
$297.43 $42.49
$212.08 $30.30
$117.05 $16.72

Along with the downside targets we included a charting of the expected levels, as seen below on a split adjusted basis:

image

On July 17, 2013, we said the following of of Apple:

“Currently, Apple is demonstrating a basing pattern that if successful, could result in a breakout to the upside.  At the current levels, we wouldn’t be opposed to buying some shares of Apple with the expectation that the stock could decline an additional –25% to –35%.”

Since July 17, 2013, Apple’s price has seen the following breakout to the upside:

image

Below are the Speed Resistance Lines based on the work of Edson Gould as of November 19, 2018.  As has been the case in the past, we can only be confident of the conservative downside target being achieved. Continue reading

Swiss National Bank Downside Targets

From the stunning peak of $8,700 in April 2018, Swiss National Bank has declined –36.78% as of November 13, 2018.  What might be different about this time, versus when SNBN was at $4,449 or $5,940 is that when the price declined it never achieved the conservative downside target of the Speed Resistance Lines [SRL].

peak extreme mid-range conservative 
$8,700.00 $2,900.00 $3,657.00 $4,414.00
$4,449.00 $1,483.00 $2,240.00 $2,997.00
$5,940.00 $1,980.00 $2,737.00 $3,494.00

The latest decline has hit the conservative downside target at $4,414 and is in the process of retesting that level, as seen below.

image

Watch the $5,500 level closely as a continued decline could have broad reaching impact on some popular tech stocks.

Amazon.com Downside Targets

On October 25, 2018, in after-hours trading, Amazon.com (AMZN) was trading down to the level of $1,664.00. 

We’ve tried the Speed Resistance Lines on this stock in the past and it is one of the few that has not achieved the conservative downside target.  In spite of previous failures, here we go with the minimum downside target for AMZN, let’s watch as it defies (again), our minimum target of $969.28.

image