Category Archives: gold

Gold Stock Indicator

Continue reading

Our Strategy on Gold Stocks

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator

Continue reading

Richard Russell Review: Letter 554

Dow Theory Letters Issue 554 was written on February 7, 1973. At the time, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was indicated to be at the 968.32 level.  This was at a point prior to the Dow Industrials declining –40% while the Dow Transports declined –37% to the late 1974 lows.

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator

We rely heavily on our Gold Stock Indicator for signs of when to buy gold stocks.  The reason for this is because we found the alternatives, the Gold/XAU and XAU/Gold ratios, to be highly deficient.  These two ratios were thought to be the bedrock of indications on when to buy and sell gold stocks.  According to well known analyst John Hussman, the Gold/XAU ratio has the following indications:

Continue reading

Gold and Natural Inclinations

The dialog below is an interaction between one of our subscriber.

Continue reading

Gold Stock Indicator

Based on our preliminary work, we believe that gold stocks, as represented by the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index, will reach our long-term gold stock sell indication between July 15, 2013 and November 25, 2013.

image
This is our best estimate based on the current trajectory of our Gold Stock Indicator. As we get closer to the dates, we will be better able to project the gold stock long-term sell indication with what we believe to be a certain level of accuracy.

This estimate is subject to change if the short-term gold stock buy indication (green diagonal line) is broken to the downside which would bring us back to the long-term gold stock buy indication. The scenario that could easily break the downside trendline is a general stock market decline.  Although Dow Theory indicates that this is a possibility, we're waiting for the appropriate confirmation either up or down. 

The best example of where the stock market is right now is reflected in the chart below, from our September 21, 2012 Dow Altimeter:

Royal Gold (RGLD) Speed Resistance Lines

In the chart below we’ve provided Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL).

image

What is interesting about the above chart is the following:

  • Point A1 to point A2 declined –60%
  • Point B1 to point B2 declined –40%
  • Point C1 to point C2 is a projected decline of –55%

The SRL for Royal Gold at $44.62 doesn’t seem outlandish given what has already occurred in the previous declines from prior peaks.  The X marks the first decline after a “minor” parabolic move that was later exceeded on a larger scale to point A1, B1 and C1.  Additionally, the  X reflects the minimum retracement from the top and has provided consistent support for the price for RGLD.

We’d consider buying RGLD if it declines to either of the support levels of X3 or C2.  The movement of RGLD has been consistent with the price of gold (GLD) which is in stark contrast with gold stocks as represented by the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (^XAU), as indicated in the chart below.

image

Gold Stock Indicator: Performance Review

Article Summary

  • Our Gold Stock Indicator is currently in a rising trend.
  • The XAU Index could rise another +25%, IF prior indications are correct.
  • Gold stocks have registered solid gains since our “blanket” recommendation to buy on July 31, 2012.
  • Our preference for NEM, ABX and GG exceeded returns of FCX, BVN and GFI.
  • NUGT increased +88.19%

Our Take

Gold stocks have registered solid gains since our recommendation on July 31, 2012 (found here).  This recommendation was based on the fact that our Gold Stock Indicator was clearly in the long-term buy range as indicated by the red circle in the chart below:

image

We have a few observations that are worth considering regarding our Gold Stock Indicator.

The current parabolic rise at point (C) is matched by the rise the took place at point (A) and point (B).  Point (A) took place from January 12, 1987 to April 9, 1987.  The rise in the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) at that time was +55.98%.  To put this into perspective, during the same four months, Barrick Gold (ABX) rose +77.36% Newmont Mining (NEM) rose +60.86% and Agnico-Eagle (AEM) rose +33.87%.

At point (B), from February 5, 1993 to June 25, 1993, the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index rose +54.14%.  Barrick Gold rose +43.29%, Newmont Mining rose +20% and Agnico-Eagle rose +98.34%.

So, what is the message in all this data? In theory, based on the two prior moves at point A and B, The XAU Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index could rise another 25%. If you believe in a further rise in gold stocks, then Barrick Gold is the one to own. You now have the date ranges so you can now compare any other gold stocks that are out there and see if there is a consistent performer out there other than Barrick.

Another observation is that there were three similar powerful parabolic moves that failed at points 1, 2 and 3. Because we really don’t know how much further this rise will go, we always advise that investors take the gains and rotate into whichever gold stocks are currently trading near a new low.

One thing you must remember, gold itself did not perform well in comparison to gold stocks.  In 1987 and 1993 periods mentioned above, gold rose only +2.43% and +14%, respectively.  This is why we call it the Gold Stock Indicator, it reflects the relative outperformance to the upside and downside, as compared to the actual precious metal.

For those willing to accept the risks, two alternatives to owning individual gold and silver stocks could consider Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) in the form of Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) or Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ).  In the period from July 31st to September 28th, SIL increased +36.34% while GDXJ increased +28.46%.  It is important to note that when you eliminate the individual stock risk with these ETFs, you inherit and assume brand new risks that may have not been fully revealed due to the relatively short history  of ETFs.

The performance of all the gold stocks since the July 31, 2012 recommendation are as follows (our picks in yellow):

Symbol
Name 7/30/2012 9/28/2012 % change
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. $15.18 $21.44 41.24%
SLW Silver Wheaton Corp. $28.27 $39.71 40.47%
GOLD Randgold Resources Ltd. $91.18 $123.00 34.90%
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. $76.63 $99.83 30.28%
AUY Yamana Gold, Inc. $15.17 $19.11 25.97%
ABX Barrick Gold Corporation $33.17 $41.76 25.90%
GG Goldcorp Inc. $36.70 $45.85 24.93%
NEM Newmont Mining Corp. $45.06 $56.01 24.30%
SSRI Silver Standard Resources Inc. $13.07 $16.03 22.65%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation $8.59 $10.21 18.86%
AEM Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. $44.16 $51.88 17.48%
FCX Freeport-McMoRan $34.01 $39.58 16.38%
BVN Buenaventura SA $36.89 $38.96 5.61%
AU AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. $34.55 $35.05 1.45%
GFI Gold Fields Ltd. $13.09 $12.85 -1.83%
HMY Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. $10.07 $8.41 -16.48%

As a follow-up, the Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 3X Shrs (NUGT) increased by the staggering amount of +88.19%.

Gold Stock Investors: To Beat Inflation Look to Food Processors, Producers and Distributors

We’ve long maintained the view that in order for long-term investors to beat inflation, the conventional wisdom of investing in gold and silver stocks is not the most advantageous way to benefit from what almost everyone believes is coming as a consequence of QE4ever.  While we favor the physical metals (especially silver) and their paper derivatives like (GLD) and (SLV), we’ve also claimed that a specific strategy is needed in order to get the most mileage out of gold and silver stock investing.  However, in order to really beat inflation, forget gold and silver stocks and instead consider companies involved in food processing, producing and distribution industries.

Before we can tackle our food processors, producers and distributors, we need to examine the well documented wealth destruction that has occurred in the gold stock sector in the last year despite the relatively slight decline in the price of gold. Below is a table reflecting the percentage range that many gold and silver stocks have experienced between their one year high and low.

Symbol Name 1-yr % range
NG NovaGold Resources Inc. -69.33%
MUX McEwen Mining Inc. -68.23%
SSRI Silver Standard Resources Inc. -57.35%
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. -56.19%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation -55.98%
BAA Banro Corporation -53.55%
AUQ AuRico Gold Inc. -53.13%
AEM Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. -51.78%
HMY Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. -44.81%
ABX Barrick Gold Corporation -41.79%
GG Goldcorp Inc. -41.74%
NEM Newmont Mining Corp. -40.69%
AU AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. -37.81%
GFI Gold Fields Ltd. -36.32%
BVN Compania de Minas Buenaventura SA -34.03%
SLV iShares Silver Trust -30.46%
GLD SPDR Gold Shares -15.50%

In all instances, those who had invested in these stocks did not expect that they’d face the prospect of –30% declines in value before they’d realize a gain. In fact, many of these stocks are not at a break-even point if purchased a year ago. Naturally, this should lead inflationistas and gold bugs to feeling a high level of frustration with the belief that gold stocks are a true inflation hedge.

Some perpetual gold bull analysts/marketers argue that gold junior and exploration companies provide better investment opportunities as compared to the many large cap gold stocks like Barrick Gold (ABX), Agnico-Eagle (AEM), and Newmont Mining (NEM). However, the last year has been unforgiving to the larger junior and exploration companies as represented by the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners (GDXJ) in the chart below:

image

As early as 2008, in an article titled “Why Gold Will Decline More than the Markets,” we’ve cautioned gold stock investors to be prepared for gold stocks to decline by a greater percentage whenever the general stock market, as represented by the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) or S&P 500 Index (SPY), declines -10% or more.

Within the last year, the closest the Dow Industrials and S&P 500 came to a -10% decline was from April 2nd to June 1st when the indexes fell –8.63% and –9.93%, respectively.  Unfortunately, the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) was already in a declining trend after having lost -22.85% from the April 8, 2011 high until April 2, 2012.  Despite this fact, the XAU Index managed to lose an additional –20.87% from April 2, 2012 to the May 15, 2012 low.

As an alternative to the “mines” of precious metal stock investing, we’ve recommended investing in food processors, producers and distributors that have a history prudent of dividend increasing policies to take advantage of the expectations of high inflation down the road.  Among the many companies that we’re currently following closely  in this sector are Hershey (HSY), ConAgra (CAG), and Sysco Foods (SYY).

With all the unexplained pain in the precious metal sector in the last year, companies like ConAgra (CAG), Hershey (HSY) and Sysco Foods (SYY) have continued to increase shareholder value, dividend payments and see steady gains in their stock price.  Although the last two years hasn’t been as favorable for Sysco Foods, HSY and CAG have managed to keep pace with the overall market.

Our belief in the processors, producers and distributors is rooted in the performance of these stocks during the last precious metal bull market from 1970 to 1980 and beyond. In a piece titled “ConAgra: A History of Beating Precious Metals During a Commodity Bull Market,” we compared the performance of ConAgra to Newmont Mining (NEM) and Hecla Mining (HL) at the peak in the market in 1972, before the –42% decline in the Dow Industrials, and the subsequent peak in the commodity bull market in 1980.

What we found was that CAG matched the performance of NEM and HL by the end of the gold bull market in 1980 and went on to out-distance both stocks after the commodity bull market ended, by nearly seven time in 1983.  As a follow-up to our initial ConAgra observation in November 21, 2010, we can see the performance of the same three stock in the chart below:

image

The performance of ConAgra over the last 2 years has been exceptional in comparison to Newmont Mining and Hecla Mining. Today, ConAgra reported that first quarter net doubled and raised their full year expected earnings. CAG’s stock was up +6.20% on the news.  The news out of ConAgra suggests that processors, producers and distributors have much to gain from the coming inflation.

Precious metal enthusiasts will likely argue that the less than redeeming attributes of the companies selected (Newmont Mining and Hecla Mining) such as bad management, unprofitable properties, etc. contributed to the poor performance.  Another common refrain is, “look how my gold stocks have done in the last 3 or 4 months.” We believe such arguments are the equivalent of whistling past the graveyard.

Consider the following data points, since June 30, 1972 CAG, HL and NEM have generated the following returns, according to Morningstar.com:

  • CAG: +9,021.62%
  • HL:  -42.76%
  • NEM: +392.29%

When viewed from the perspective of trying to beat inflation, during the only proven gold bull market in recent history, gold and silver stocks don’t have the durability to truly beat inflation. For those that are ardent long-term value investors, you don’t really need to wade into the dark pools of precious metal stock investing where a mine can flood, a strike will break out, management can be slightly off with their estimates or the cost of production increases causing a stock to collapse in the middle of widely recognized gold bull market.  Instead, focus your research and due diligence in the food processors, producers and distributors that are trading near their respective new lows. You will be rewarded far beyond the high inflation period to come.

Dividend Investors: Beware of Payments in Gold

As long-term investors in precious metals, we have featured several articles that warned about the pitfalls of gold and silver investing rather than highlighting the redeeming attributes in the sector.  One reason for this is the one-sided analysis that permeates throughout the gold and silver investment community.

Too often there are voices clamoring for attention about reasons to invest in gold and silver and very few of those same voices willing to say “dump the junk.”  Some analysts in the gold sector will defy logic by recommending gold stocks in an obvious declining trend rendering their analysis moot since anyone can use the rationale “we’re in a bull market” to justify their claims.

One sure sign that we’re in a gold bull market is when gold and silver mining companies start paying ever increasing dividends.  In a 2009 article titled “Why Silver Beats Gold As a Precious Metals Play,” we said, “be mindful of the coming competitive dividend war between precious metal companies.”  Apparently, precious metal stocks have not disappointed in sharing the wealth in the current gold bull market. According to Morningstar.com, in the last five years the top ten dividend increasing companies in the precious metal sector has averaged +29.61%.  We don’t expect this trend to reverse in the near term.

Symbol Company 5-year dividend growth rate
AEM Agnico-Eagle 84.42%
AUY Yamana Gold 50.61%
IAG IamGold 29.87%
DRD DRDGold 26.08%
NEM Newmont Mining 20.11%
GG Goldcorp 19.26%
ABX Barrick Gold 18.31%
BVN Buenaventura 17.97%
RGLD Royal Gold 17.50%
GFI Gold Fields 11.98%
Average dividend growth rate 29.61%
Source: Morningstar.com accessed August 15, 2012

Also, in the same 2009 article and later reiterated in our 2011 article titled “The Coming Precious Metals Dividend War,” we said the following, “one gold or silver company is going to ‘jump the shark’ and make the dividend payments in the actual metal. When that time comes, it will be fair warning to protect your positions, though this may be indistinguishable to ebullient gold bugs at the time.”  When we published our October 13, 2011 article titled “Gold Resource: Gold Dividend Means Sell” we felt that precious metal investors had been given fair warning that “…it may be an indication of a cyclical or short-term top in the gold market.”

The announcement by Gold Resource (GORO) that the option for an “in-kind” dividend in the form of gold was on August 17, 2011 (PDF found here).  Three trading days later, the price of the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), according to Yahoo!Finance, peaked at $184.59.  Twelve trading days after GORO’s announcement, according to Kitco.com, the London PM fix for gold closed at the peak price of $1,895.  At the same time, the long established Philadelphia Gold and Silver Stock Index (XAU) declined as much as –33% by May, 15, 2012 and has settled at a loss of -26.80%.

image

As the precious metals dividend war heats up, the timing, nature of the dividend, and the quality of the company will provide for some perspective as to whether we are at a short/long-term peak in the precious metal market.

However, as we’ve said in the past, companies that pay dividends in gold have historically had difficulty in retaining such a policy.  Those companies that currently have a policy of offering dividend payments in gold should be expected to discontinue such distributions at some point down the road.  When that change in policy arrives, the news could push the respective gold and silver stock prices well below known “undervalued” levels.

If you must invest in precious metal stocks, we’d opt for those that are part of the XAU Index or the HUI Gold Bug Index and pay their dividends only in the form of cash.

Gold Stock Indicator: The Big Picture

Article Summary

  • Start accumulating gold stocks now
  • select gold stocks from those in the XAU Index
  • at minimum, investors must allow for 25% downside risk before reinvesting more funds

Our Take

On November 2, 2011, we posted an article which highlighted the fact that gold stocks routinely underperform the price of gold (found here). Also in that article, we introduced our Gold Stock Indicator to show that the timing of when to buy gold stocks was more important than the fact that prices and valuations appear to be low.

To demonstrate the significance of our indicator, we’d like to contrast it to the widely used Gold/XAU ratio. According to noted market commentator and fund manager John Hussman:

“…since 1974, the Gold/XAU ratio has been greater than 5.0 about 15% of the time. When the ratio has been this high, the XAU has followed with annualized gains of 89.6%, on average.” (Hussman, John. “Gold/XAU Ratio Signals Buy for Gold Stocks”. Seeking Alpha. March 13, 2007.)

Below is a chart of the Gold/XAU ratio since December 12, 1983:

image

Unfortunately, as gold has transitioned to a secular bull market cycle, the Gold/XAU ratio since 1999 has not provided a consistent signal of when to buy and sell gold stocks. In fact, on July 15, 2008, the Gold/XAU ratio indicated that gold stocks should be bought even as the XAU Index was about to fall an additional –66%.

Also popular among gold investors is the inverse chart of the same ratio known as the XAU/Gold ratio or gold stock/gold ratio. Many variations of these ratios are carelessly used by market commentators with the hope to prove that gold stocks should be acquired. So far, the Gold/XAU ratio has incorrectly indicated that gold stocks are a “buy” for the past 998 trading days in a row. Few who make reference to these ratios are willing to show the full history of these gold and gold stock ratios. In all cases, the ratio is the same and since July 15, 2008 has failed to steer gold stock investors away from significant loses in gold stocks.

In stark contrast, our Gold Stock Indicator had been able to consistently identify long-term opportunities of when to buy and sell gold stocks. Below is the most updated version of our Gold Stock Indicator:

image

At the current level, our indicator suggests that gold stocks should be accumulated. The last time that gold stocks were at the exact same level, gold and gold stocks posted the following returns:

Year(s) Gold XAU
1986-1987 22.35% 84.11%
1987-1989 -4.81% 52.87%
1992-1993 11.03% 66.44%
1997-2006 83.00% 113.54%
2008-2010 64.14% 99.95%
Average gain/loss 35.14% 83.38%

While we recommend accumulating gold stocks at this time, it is important to understand and accept the possible downside risks. Below is the percentage loss that was experienced after each indication to buy gold stocks and before any gains were realized:

1986 -16.57%
1992 -5.92%
1997 -34.54%
2008 -40.81%
Average Decline -24.46%

The 1987-1989 period was excluded from our downside risk data simply because it did not have any loss before moving to the sell indication. If we included the decline after the 1987 buy signal the average loss would have been –19.57% for all five buy signals since 1983. However, we’d like to opt for the more conservative figure of –24.46% to keep our expectation more realistic.

Those who wish to participate in the eventual run up in gold stocks should consider those that are a part of the XAU index. The members of the XAU index are ranked below based on the percentage from the 52-week low:

Symbol Name price P/E EPS Yield Price/Book % from Low % of Index
NEM Newmont Mining Corp. $45.06 97.31 0.46 3.1 1.72 5.12% 10.90%
BVN Buenaventura SA $36.89 11.17 3.31 2.1 2.88 5.45% 4.60%
ABX Barrick Gold Corporation $33.17 8.11 4.1 2.5 1.34 7.26% 16.00%
GFI Gold Fields Ltd. $13.09 9.72 1.34 4.6 1.66 11.70% 4.70%
AU AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. $34.55 894.90 0.04 1.2 240.61 12.61% 6.60%
PAAS Pan American Silver Corp. $15.18 5.19 2.93 1 0.82 12.68% 0.70%
GG Goldcorp Inc. $36.70 22.94 1.6 1.5 1.36 16.30% 14.50%
HMY Harmony Gold Mining Co. Ltd. $10.07 14.30 0.71 1 1.08 17.00% 2.20%
FCX Freeport-McMoRan $34.01 10.19 3.33 3.7 1.95 17.63% 15.70%
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation $8.59 0.00 -1.96 1.9 0.78 20.60% 3.40%
AUY Yamana Gold, Inc. $15.17 19.86 0.76 1.4 1.49 23.00% 5.60%
SLW Silver Wheaton Corp. $28.27 17.48 1.62 1.3 3.59 23.45% 4.80%
GOLD Randgold Resources Ltd. $91.18 19.84 4.6 0.4 3.68 25.11% 4.10%
SSRI Silver Standard Resources Inc. $13.07 15.24 0.86 0 1.06 30.02% 0.50%
RGLD Royal Gold, Inc. $76.63 46.43 1.65 0.8 2.57 34.40% 2.20%
AEM Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. $44.16 0.00 -3.3 1.9 2.31 40.80% 3.60%

In theory, the stocks that have the largest weighting in the index contribute the most movement either up or down. However, this may not result in the largest percentage gains that are possible as compared to other stocks in the XAU index. We prefer those stocks that are nearest the low, so we’d opt for NEM, ABX and GG ahead of FCX, BVN and GFI.

Gold stocks that are a part of the XAU index have the benefit of institutional support and the risk of individual implosions. Also, as we’ve explained in our article titled “Why Gold Stocks Will Decline More Than the Markets,” gold stocks are tied strongly to the performance of the general stock market. This was graphically demonstrated in 2008 when gold stocks declined –68% in the period from March 14th to October 27th. Many claim that 2008 was an aberration, our analysis of gold stocks from the 1924 to the present clearly indicates that 2008 was not a fluke. Keep in mind that a –68% decline in the stock index means that individual stocks within the index likely fell much lower, on a percentage basis.

Investors should take their time in acquiring gold stocks as there is some downside risk. However, if 10%-15% of the portfolio is set aside for such investing, there are good opportunities if the purchases are done in stages.

NUGT: A “buy” signal eminent

For those willing to speculate with a portion of their funds based on the movement of gold stocks, the Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 3X Shares (NUGT) is about to signal a short & long-term buy indication.  We believe this indication will be registered be when NUGT declines below $7.60.  The $7.60 figure seems approximate, however, may change based on market conditions.  Your best confirmation of what we think is an appropriate level to buy NUGT should be based on our Transaction Alert.

image

As we’ve indicated before, we believe that a decline of –30% or more would not be unexpected for NUGT before achieving the average gain of +20% from the initial “buy” signal.  Our strategy for this next indication is to set aside 1/3 of the amount for the initial signal to buy.  If NUGT declines by an additional -15% then we’d buy more shares of NUGT with the remaining 2/3 of available funds set aside.  An example of how this would play out with $3,000 set aside for this speculation from May 3, 2012 for a 20% rise above the initial “buy” signal is as follows:

  • buy $1,000 (1/3) at $11.06 sell and at 20% gain ($13.27)
  • buy $2,000 (2/3) at $9.40 or below then sell at $13.27
  • the average cost would be $9.90
  • a total gain of +34% would be possible if sold at $13.27, or 20% above the initial entry price.

Our purchase of the Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 3X Shares (NUGT) is strictly a speculation which we will sell soon after it has achieved our target amount.  Direxion’s DUST and NUGT ETFs are strictly for speculators (short-term) and should not be entered into for investment (long-term) purposes.

NUGT: Where to Now?

After posting our Gold Stock Indicator article on April 4th (found here) and suggesting that a low would be achieved between April 4th and June 7th, the actual low was hit on May 15th. This was well within the indicated date range that a major low would be achieved.

The run-up from the low was on April 15th and generated gains of +67%. Additionally, from when the short-term buy indication was first hit on May 3, 2012, the gain was +21%. We weren't savvy enough to get all of the gains from the indicated low, however, the Gold Stock Indicator appears to be hitting its marks with ease.

At the current pace, our Gold Stock Indicator has a tentative downside target for NUGT of $6.00 before it crosses simultaneously below both the long-term and short-term buy indications, as seen in the chart below. The estimated time-frame for this downside target is approximately 1 and 1/2 months from now.

image

We expect that the conservative gain of +21% should be expected from NUGT once it first crosses below the short-term buy indication line. Significant downside movement would still remain as was the case after the May 3rd crossing below the short-term buy indication. The amount of decline after the May 3rd indication was -28%, however, the subsequent gains of +21% was achieved in 35 calendar days while the bottom on May 15th achieved gains of 67% in exactly 30 calendar days.

As a caveat, in the same April 4th article, we indicated that “our worst case scenario for a bottom in gold stocks is the period between June 15, 2012 and August 21, 2012.”  Presently, it appears that we are on course to achieve such a worse case situation based on the reversal of the rising trend of the Gold Stock Indicator. Our definition of worse case means a gold price of $1,200 to $1,300 and a NUGT price of $4 or less.

Gold Stock Indicator Update

Our Gold Stock Indicator, as seen below, is going on an interesting ride.

image

On May 27, 2012 (found here), we did an appraisal of the gold situation and said the following:

“…in all instances of an initial ‘short-term buy indication’ [green arrow] (except August 8, 2011), the Gold Stock Indicator was followed by a second opportunity to buy [red arrow] NUGT, sometimes at lower levels.”

In the chart above, we show a red arrow between May 3rd and June 28th.  It is important to take note of the fact that even though the Gold Stock Indicator is currently at the exact same level as on May 3rd, the price of NUGT is more than $1.00 below the May price.

So far, it appears that NUGT is on course to provide us with the second opportunity to take a position, as we have anticipated.  In prior moves from the short-term buy indication to the short-term sell indication, the Gold Stock Indicator has “double dipped.”  By double-dip we mean that the price of NUGT has declined the short-term buy indication a second time before making an assault on the long-term sell indication.

Our only question at this time is how far must NUGT fall before it reaches the short-term buy level.  If the most recent comparison between May 3rd and June 28th is any indication, then it is possible that NUGT could decline as low as $6.

Precious Metal Myths: A Metal “Standard” Promotes Economic Stability

As precious metals investors since 1996 (long only) and speculators since 2008 (long and short), we readily admit that when the right price appears we’re going to sell a large portion of our physical inventory.  We have written numerous articles on gold and silver highlighting both the good and the bad associated with investing in precious metals.  We feel that a balanced view of both the risks and rewards of precious metals investment and speculation is critical to the longer term goal of wealth accumulation.

Unfortunately, there is a contingent of precious metal marketers that would rather stretch the truth or even promote myths to inspire undue hope, fear, and reckless optimism.  A common myth by these marketers is that if we have a gold “standard” instead of a U.S. dollar based financial system, our debt laden society would become stable.  Unfortunately, promoters of this claim have not carefully examined a period when there was a gold “standard.”

Below is a chart of gold and silver in the period from 1846 to 1895, this to set the stage for the level of stability that was experienced by most Americans.

image

The chart above is drawn from an article titled “The Relative Stability of Gold and Silver” by Edward Sherwood Meade in the Annals of the American Academy of Political Social Science, 1899.  In the period from 1851 to 1873, there was a bimetallic “standard,” where both gold and silver were used as a monetary base in some countries.  At the same time, either gold or silver was used in other countries as a form of a monetary “standard.”  After the period of 1873, the silver “standard” was abandoned due to “…legislative and industrial” reasons according to Meade.

Unfortunately, both gold and silver “standards” are constructs of legislative actions (fiat) and subject to industrial supply and demand constraints, just as the U.S. dollar is subject to fiscal and monetary policies (etc.).  It should be noted that although gold and silver were the “standards” for a given monetary system, there was still a decline of nearly –33% in the value of gold and silver from 1851 to 1873.  The subsequent dramatic rise of both gold and silver from 1873 and beyond only demonstrates just how little stability there actually was in having gold and silver as the anchor for the monetary system.

Adding insult to injury, it took 33 years for gold to achieve parity after the decline from 1851.  This is eerily similar to the 31 years it has taken gold to achieve the inflation-adjusted equivalent of 1980 when gold peaked at $1,900 an ounce in 2011.

image

While gold and silver was vacillating wildly as a “standard” in the 1800’s, the stock market, represented by the chart below, was demonstrating its characteristic fluctuations.

image

The stock market increased nearly +300% and declined over -50% on two separate occasions in the period from 1860-1895.  Having a gold and silver “standard” promoted greater volatility in the market since it would take a government edict (fiat) to mitigate massive gains or losses in the price of gold and silver.  Additionally, cornering of the market was much easier then than it is today.

At the same time that the stock market was experiencing wide gyrations, the U.S. economy experienced widespread panics and depressions in the period from 1857 to 1895.  Below are the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) dates for economic recessions from 1857 to 1895:

Peak Trough Contraction                                                (peak to trough in months)
June 1857(II) December 1858 (IV) 18
October 1860(III) June 1861 (III) 8
April 1865(I) December 1867 (I) 32
June 1869(II) December 1870 (IV) 18
October 1873(III) March 1879 (I) 65
March 1882(I) May 1885 (II) 38
March 1887(II) April 1888 (I) 13
July 1890(III) May 1891 (II) 10
January 1893(I) June 1894 (II) 17

Amazingly, 47% of the time from 1857 to 1895 was spent in periods of recession with a large dose of panics and crashes mixed in.   The most notable of the U.S. economic contractions started with the panic of 1873 which, spawned by years of railway speculation in the U.S. but sparked by the collapse of banking giant Jay Cooke & Co.,  led to a global economic depression that lasted well beyond 1878 in many other countries.  The panic of 1873 was the longest lasting recession/depression based on NBER data.

Currently, the monopoly role (corner of the market) that government has on monetary and fiscal policy allows investors and speculators a better chance to align their interests within the context of the known.  What we know is that the purchasing power of the dollar will never increase under the current regime.  If governments are allowed to set artificial “standards” then investors and speculators would not know when the policy will be changed/ended.

Again, anyone who feels that the current system is out of whack should carefully consider the prospects of the “legislative and industrial” whims that a gold and silver “standard” could bring.  We believe that whether dollar, gold, yen, silver, yuan, or pesos, the only constant is change itself.

Planning accordingly for the prospects of change is what makes for successful investment and speculation in the precious metals market.  Those marketers who rely on fear and the propagation of myths only serve to ensure the maximum number of unsuccessful speculators.

Note: In terms of gold and silver, the word “standard” following each metal is really a pseudonym for price control, price fixing and propping the market for whatever the “standard” may be.  This means that the market value for whatever the “standard” is will not be realized in the open market in the period that a “standard” is used. 

There is nothing more oxymoronic than the word “standard” being applied to either gold, silver, or the U.S. dollar since the origins of the word “standard” is rooted in the meaning to “stand fast or firm.”  This is something that could never occur in a world that is always seeking a price, unless mandated by government that price seeking is illegal.