Category Archives: ISRG

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: May 8, 2015

Performance Review

Below is the performance of the Nasdaq 100 watch list from May 9, 2014:

Symbol Name 2014 2015 % change
DISCA Discovery Comm. 37.33 31.33 -16.07%
BBBY Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 61.31 71.44 16.52%
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 353.06 494.32 40.01%
NTAP NetApp, Inc. 34.19 35.65 4.27%
EBAY eBay Inc. 50.54 58.82 16.38%
ALTR Altera Corp. 32.38 44.46 37.31%
WFM Whole Foods Market, Inc. 39.32 42.58 8.29%
SIRI Sirius XM Holdings Inc. 3.16 3.87 22.47%
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. 60.53 73.66 21.69%
COST Costco Wholesale 115.39 145.88 26.42%
LMCA Liberty Media Corp. 34.18 37.93 10.97%
SRCL Stericycle, Inc. 113.90 134.01 17.66%
CERN Cerner Corporation 50.19 68.02 35.53%
CA CA Technologies 29.41 31.60 7.45%

The average gain of the entire list was +17.78% while the top five stocks (DISCA, BBBY, ISRG, NTAP, EBAY) gained an average of +12.22%.  This compares with the gain for the Nasdaq 100 index of +23.41% in the same 1-year time period.

image

As has frequently been the case, analyst expectations were too optimistic for stocks on the far right (DISCA, CA, CERN, SIRI, NTAP) where the average gains of +10.73%.  Likewise, the view was too pessimistic for stocks on the far left (LMCA, ISRG, WFM, COST, BBBY) which averaged +20.44% in the above chart.

The absolute change in Liberty Media (LMCA) and Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) was the most extreme.  Liberty Media saw its p/e ratio expand from 20 to 72 while ISRG’s p/e ratio increased from 26 to 39.  The increase in the p/e ratio should be expected with the increase in price.  However, value oriented investors would have overlooked these stocks simply because of the high p/e ratios and the expectation of lower earnings by analysts in 2014.

Watch List: May 8, 2015

Below are the Nasdaq 100 stocks of interest:

Continue reading

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: April 24, 2015

Performance Review

Below is the performance of our April 25, 2014 watch list.

Symbol Name 2014 2015 % chg
BBBY Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 62.48 72.53 16.09%
CTRX Catamaran Corporation 38.95 59.56 52.91%
SIRI Sirius XM Holdings Inc. 3.12 3.96 26.92%
NTAP NetApp, Inc. 35.00 36.12 3.20%
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 366.37 505.92 38.09%
DISCA Discovery Comm 39.14 32.71 -16.43%
VRSK Verisk Analytics, Inc. 57.81 72.68 25.72%
COST Costco Wholesale 115.01 148.12 28.79%
ALTR Altera Corp. 33.09 40.89 23.57%
SRCL Stericycle, Inc. 113.96 136.94 20.16%
CERN Cerner Corporation 49.51 73.32 48.09%
ROST Ross Stores Inc. 67.77 104.38 54.02%
MAT Mattel, Inc. 37.99 30.20 -20.51%
DLTR Dollar Tree, Inc. 51.36 81.14 57.98%

The average return for the entire list was +25.62% compared to the Nasdaq 100 index gaining +28.41% in the same period of time.  The top five stocks on our list (BBBY, CTRX, SIRI, NTAP, ISRG) gained +27.44% in the last year (excluding dividends).

image

As is common with our watch lists, a stock is being acquired at what we believe is a premium.  CTRX is being acquired by UnitedHealth (UNH), a Dow Jones Industrial Average component.  At the time of our watch list last year, CTRX was within 3% of the low.  Additionally, the announcement of the purchase by UNH followed the pattern of many companies buying the intended target after a gain over of +24% within the year and +177% within the last 5 years.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: April 24, 2015

Below are the 9 Nasdaq 100 stocks that we think are worth your consideration:

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: December 26, 2014

Performance Review

The December 6, 2013 watch list contained the following companies and resulted in the accompanying 1-year results:

Symbol 2013 2014 % change
CTRX 44.99 51.93 15.43%
ALTR 32.12 38.27 19.15%
ISRG 377.38 531.24 40.77%
MXIM 28.46 31.65 11.21%
CHRW 57.89 76.75 32.58%
EBAY 52.01 57.04 9.67%
EQIX 165.48 232.76 40.66%
GOLD 65.44 66.26 1.25%

The companies on our watch list from last year gained an average of +21.34% as compared to the Nasdaq 100 which gained +23.11%.  Our analyst estimate section of the watch list from last year shows what the stock on our list were expected to do over the following 12 months.

image

All of the stocks were expected to decline in value, overall.  However, what is most striking about the one year performance is that while companies on the far left were expected to do the worst those on the far right were expected to the best (sort of).  Below is the actual one year performance:

image

A side by side comparison will demonstrate that (again) the trend of performance favors those stocks that have been pinned with the worst expectations.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: December 26, 2014

The following stocks are on our radar and should be on yours:

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: December 5, 2014

Performance Review

Below is the watch list from December 6, 2013 and the subsequent performance over the last year:

Symbol Name 2013 2014 % change
CTRX Catamaran  44.99 51.25 13.91%
ALTR Altera Corp. 32.12 37.93 18.09%
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 377.38 508.86 34.84%
MXIM Maxim Integrated 28.46 31.36 10.19%
CHRW CH Robinson Worldwide 57.89 74.63 28.92%
EBAY eBay Inc. 52.01 54.81 5.38%
EQIX Equinix, Inc. 165.48 231.68 40.00%
GOLD Randgold Resources 65.44 64.85 -0.90%
Average change 18.80%
Nasdaq 100 Index 23.04%

Below is the chart of analyst estimated returns from December 6, 2013 compared to the performance one year later:

image

In the example above, we see that, in general, the stocks performed in opposition to what analysts had anticipated.  It is important to note that we routinely recommend that investors consider the stocks that have the worst prospects first based on analyst estimates.  After appropriate due diligence, stocks deemed unacceptable risks should be eliminated.

As has been the case for some time, analyst estimates have fallen far from the mark when assessing the prospects for stocks.  At the time, Equinix (EQIX) was considered by analysts to have the worst prospects.  As it happens, Equinix managed to gain the most among the stocks that we tracked last year.  For our part, we had EQIX on our radar as early as July 26, 2013.  We said the following of the stock:

“A stock that is establishing a significant technical pattern is Equinix (EQIX).  It seems that Equinix is developing a ‘head and shoulder’ formation.  this suggests that a further decline below $176 will result in a minimum decline to the conservative downside target of $158.37.  We would consider a review of EQIX fundamentals at or below $110.”

Our concern for downside risk resulted in being too cautious.  However, after our July 26, 2013 commentary, EQIX declined from $183.75 to the Edson Gould SRL conservative downside target of $158.37.  Once achieving the low at $155, EQIX started to make the long climb higher.

image

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: December 5, 2014

The following are the stocks that are on our watch list with Analyst Estimates:

Nasdaq 100 Review

Below is the one year performance of our August 23, 2013 Nasdaq 100 Watch List stocks (8/23/2013 to 8/26/2014):

Symbol Name 2013 2014 % change
SHLD Sears Holdings Corp 39.6 34.67 -12.45%
EQIX Equinix, Inc. 170.01 217.25 27.79%
TEVA Teva Pharmaceutical 38.3 52.22 36.34%
CHRW Robinson Worldwide 57.2 68.45 19.67%
EXPE Expedia Inc. 48.84 87.43 79.01%
NUAN Nuance Comm. 19.31 17.17 -11.08%
MXIM Maxim Integrated 27.71 30.91 11.55%
BRCM Broadcom Corp. 25.24 38.81 53.76%
ISRG Intuitive Surgical 390.09 478.68 22.71%
NWSA News Corporation 15.75 17.62 11.87%
Avg. % change 23.92%
NDX Nasdaq 100 Index 30.26%

The watch list of stocks gained +23% versus a gain of +30% in the Nasdaq 100 Index.  The best performing stock, with gains of +79%, was Expedia which was a strong interest stock featured on our July 26, 2013 watch list.  At the time, we said the following:

Travel website operator Expedia (EXPE) has suddenly dropped in on our watch list with a –27.38% decline in the stock price on Friday July 26, 2013.  We’re not sure that a –28% decline in quarterly earnings requires a –27% decline in the stock price.  This type of activity suggests that since June 2012, investors had not sufficiently assessed the prospects of the company before acquiring the stock.  Extreme swings in the price indicate that there is more downside risk.

Applying Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines gives us a conservative downside target of $42.56 and an extreme downside target of $22.70.

Our expectation is that there is a good chance that Expedia will decline to the $34 level.  Once falling below $34, Expedia should be reviewed on a fundamental basis as a going concern.  There may be significant opportunity for this stock as the performance has been in line with industry competitors.

As is often the case, we were too conservative in believing that EXPE would achieve the rising $34.00 level.  Instead, EXPE fell exactly to the rising $42.56 level and moved higher from there (updated chart below).

image

Another strong interest stock in the same July 26, 2013 posting, Equinix (EQIX) also fell only as low as the conservative downside target.  From the peak price of $229.02, EQIX spent only four trading days below $158.37.  It has been nothing but an uphill climb since.

The worst performing stock was Sears Holdings (SHLD).  Sears has essentially traded with descending peaks since 2007 with price support at around $30.  A break below $30 could result in significant loss for any remaining shareholders.  Private equity firms must be circling Sears at the prospect of a decline below the long-term support.

image

The strong interest stock from the August 23, 2013 watch list was Maxim Integrated Products (MXIM). At the time we said of MXIM:

“The stock of most interest to us is Maxim Integrated Products (MXIM).  Maxim has had a great run since our March 20, 2010 highlight of the chip sector as potential investment candidates (found here).  In the chart below, since the 2008 trough, Maxim has maintained a consistent ability to rebound from the conservative downside target of $26.97.  However, if the stock cannot hold the line at $26.91, then we expect that the stock will fall to the $19.03 level.  The extreme downside target is $11.10, however, we don’t expected this to be achieved.  Potential investments at the current level along with stepped up amounts of capital at $19.03 and $15.87 is recommended.”

Since August 23, 2013, Maxim increased as much as +29.05% before falling to a 1-year gain of “only” +11%.  If we include the dividend of 3.80%, the total return would be +15% for the last year.  Below is the updated SRL for MXIM with new conservative and extreme downside targets.

image

Although Maxim has fallen considerably since the June 2014 peak, we’re only willing to re-consider the stock after falling at or below the rising $27.79 level.

Investment Consideration

To put all of the gains (and losses) into perspective, we like to compare any profits with the historical market return.  Below are the annualized compounded annual growth rates (CAGR) for the last 50, 40, 30, 20 and 10 years (adjusted for inflation) [source].

years CAGR
50 5.90%
40 5.80%
30 8.42%
20 6.71%
10 6.67%

If an investor can achieve two times (2x) the 30-year CAGR in a single year, it is worth considering alternative investment opportunities while selling the principal and allowing the profits to compound in those stocks that pay a dividend.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: August 1, 2014

Below is the performance of the six stocks from our August 9, 2013 Nasdaq 100 watch list (found here) compared to the Nasdaq 100 Index gain of +24.41% over the last year.

Symbol Name 2013 2014 % Change
BRCM Broadcom 26.06 38.19 +47%
CHRW Robinson Worldwide 56.79 67.7 +19%
EQIX Equinix 181.18 211.38 +17%
NUAN Nuance Comm. 19.11 17.83 -7%
SHLD Sears 41.35 37.27 -10%
ISRG Intuitive Surgical 391.87 453.17 +16%
average +14%
^NDX Nasdaq 100 Index +24.41%

The watch list underperformed the Nasdaq 100 by –10.41%.  However, the stock that we had a strong interest in, Broadcom (BRCM), garnered the following commentary:

“Broadcom (BRCM) tops our list this week and it is the stock that interests us the most, at the moment.  Right off the bat, we see that the stock has a price to book (P/B) ratio of 1.93.  Among the listed companies above, this is a compelling attribute.  Value Line Investment Survey says that the fair value for BRCM is 12 times cash flow.  Based on full year cash flow figures for 2012, BRCM is estimated to be fairly valued at $39.96 or +53% above to current price.

“Of concern with the data presented by Value Line is the fact that BRCM went from debt free in 2009 to nearly 15% of capital, as of the most recent reporting.  In one sense, corporate borrowing at low rates is a good thing.  However, we’re concerned that certain types of borrowing result in loss generating (is that possible) ventures that end up going nowhere.

“Broadcom has recently been slammed in the market based on reduced or declining guidance.  This from Investopedia.com:

‘A lot of what has worried Broadcom analysts and investors appeared to come home to roost with the company’s latest earnings report. Weak guidance has investors fearing that the company is losing more and more share to Qualcomm (QCOM), with an overall stagnation in high-end devices leading to fears that ASPs and margins are in danger. (Stephen D. Simpson. “Fear Dominating the Broadcom Story”. Investopedia. July 29, 2013. accessed August 10, 2013. link).’

“Dow Theory has the following downside targets:

  • $24.43
  • $20.61
  • $16.79
  • $12.97

“When we ran Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines, we were only able to come up with an extreme downside target of $15.78.  It seems that the $24.43 target is highly achievable.”

On August 12, 2013 (one trading day later), our downside target of $24.43 was achieved on an intraday basis  as BRCM declined as low as $23.25.  After hitting our target low, BRCM trended higher to the tune of nearly +50% gains.

image

It should be noted that in the 2013 article cited above, investors and analysts were fearful due to anticipated lower profit margins.  Please note that the NLO team does not operate by the maxim “be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful” as made famous by Warren Buffett.  Instead, we think in terms of the words of Dow Theorist William Peter Hamilton, the fourth editor of the Wall Street Journal, when he said the following:

The best way of reading the market is to read from the standpoint of values. The market is not like a balloon plunging hither and thither in the wind. As a whole, it represents a serious, well-considered effort on the part of farsighted and well-informed men to adjust prices to such values as exist or which are expected to exist in the not too remote future. The thought with great operators is not whether a price can be advanced, but whether the value of property which they propose to buy will lead investors and speculators six months hence to take stock at figures from ten to twenty points above present prices.

“In reading the market, therefore, the main point is to discover what a stock can be expected to be worth three months hence and then to see whether manipulators or investors are advancing the price of that stock toward those figures. It is often possible to read movements in the market very clearly in this way. To know values is to comprehend the meaning of movements in the market.

Source: Hamilton, William Peter. Stock Market Barometer. Page 38.

At the current price, Broadcom almost appears expensive when considered from where we thought investors should take an interest.  However, on August 1, 2014, widely followed market commentator and analyst Charles Payne came out with an article titled “Is It a Good Time to Buy Broadcom?”  According to Mr. Payne Broadcom is a compelling buy at the current price with an upside target of $47.  We believe that our work has adhered to the recognition of values as outlined by Charles Dow and reiterated by William Peter Hamilton.

We consider ourselves value investors.  This means buying stocks at intrinsically low valuations and never selling, regardless of market conditions.  In theory, individuals who sell stocks in periods from several days to 10 years are considered traders.  However, a different reality pervades our market experience.  Lacking a vast pool of resources, we can only operate with an eye for values and downside risk.  For those with a similar reality, we can only advise the best scenario that would ensure that the pool of investment resources is guarded against buyers remorse.  With this in mind and the nearly +50% gains in BRCM, we recommend selling only the principal while letting the profits compound into perpetuity.  This is our only remedy to dealing with our own personal fear of loss.  We hope this will prove useful to others.

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: August 1, 2014

Below are the Nasdaq 100 stocks that we’re following along with estimated price projections for the remainder of the reported fiscal year:

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: October 11, 2013

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 10% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence.

Continue reading

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: August 9, 2013

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 10% of the 52-week low. This list is strictly for the purpose of researching whether or not the companies have viable business models.

Continue reading

Intuitive Surgical Downside Targets

Continue reading

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: July 12, 2013

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 11% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence. Continue reading

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: May 24, 2013

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 11% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence.

Continue reading

Nasdaq 100 Watch List: March 19, 2013

Below are the Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 10% of their respective 52-week lows. Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and rigorous due diligence.

Continue reading

Nasdaq 100 Watch List

Below are the top Nasdaq 100 companies that are within 20% of the 52-week low. This list is strictly for the purpose of researching whether or not the companies have viable business models. These companies are deemed highly speculative unless otherwise noted.
Symbol Name Price P/E EPS Yield P/B % from Low
ISRG Intuitive Surgical $267.40 31.8 $8.40 - 5.26 8.68%
CEPH Cephalon, Inc. $60.32 11.3 $5.35 - 1.81 9.67%
CSCO Cisco Systems $20.97 15.4 $1.36 - 2.62 10.37%
APOL Apollo Group, Inc. $37.98 10.5 $3.62 - 4.30 12.54%
AMGN Amgen Inc. $56.98 12.3 $4.63 - 2.24 13.37%
ERTS Electronic Arts $16.05 - -$0.48 - 2.04 14.17%
QGEN Qiagen N.V. $19.32 30.4 $0.64 - 1.89 14.59%
TEVA Teva Pharma. $54.01 16.6 $3.25 1.30% 2.22 14.94%
VRTX Vertex Pharma. $36.16 - -$3.73 - 11.31 15.71%
GRMN Garmin Ltd. $30.53 8.3 $3.66 4.80% 2.10 16.93%
INTC Intel Corporation $20.66 11.2 $1.85 3.00% 2.43 17.39%
GILD Gilead Sciences $37.50 11.0 $3.42 - 5.36 18.18%
SHLD Sears Holdings $70.18 41.9 $1.68 - 0.94 18.53%
^NDX Nasdaq 100 2,276.70
***Read our Chapter 2 review of Seth Klarman's book Margin of Safety here***

Watch List Summary
From the current watchlist we are considering the prospects for Intuitive Surgical (ISRG), Intel (INTC) and Garmin (GRMN).  Garmin is interesting simply for the fact that the moving feast known as their dividend should be announced in the coming months.  We're curious if Garmin will eliminate, raise, lower or keep the dividend the same.  As has been the case in the last four years, Garmin has paid their dividend all at once.  This will be very interesting considering the 4.80% payment. 
In the Nasdaq 100 Watch List of 15 companies from December 12, 2010 to the closing price January 7, 2011, the average return from all of the companies was +3.65%.  This is compared to the NDX (Nasdaq 100 Index) which had a gain of +2.77%.
Dish Network (DISH) registered the largest gain of +12.45%. Adobe Systems (ADBE) rose 11.60% since December 12th.  Cisco (CSCO) came in third on the list with a gain of 6.45%.
Watch List Performance Review
In our ongoing review of the Nasdaq 100 Watch List, we have taken the top four stocks on our list from the closing price of January 7, 2010 and have checked their performance one year later. The top four companies on that list are provided below with the closing price for January 7, 2010 and January 7, 2011.

Symbol Name 2010 2011 % change
GILD Gilead Sciences 44.54 37.50 -15.81%
CEPH Cephalon, Inc. 63.01 60.32 -4.27%
GENZ Genzyme Corp 53.81 71.39 32.67%
APOL Apollo Group 60.50 37.98 -37.22%
Average -6.16%
^NDX Nasdaq 100 1892.59 2276.70 20.30%
Only one stock, Genzyme (GENZ), was able to to show a positive return.  This was of little consolation as the three other stocks on our watchlist fell, on average, -19%.  The Nasdaq 100 outperformed the watchlist with a gain of 20% in the last year. 
Disclaimer
Stocks that appear on our watch lists are not recommendations to buy. Instead, they are the starting point for doing your research and determining the best company to buy. Ideally, a stock that is purchased from this list is done after a considerable decline in the price and extensive due diligence. We suggest that readers use the March 2009 low (or the companies' most distressed level in the last 2 years) as the downside projection for investing. Our view is to embrace the worse case scenario prior to investing. A minimum of 50% decline or the November 2008 to March 2009 low, whichever is lower, would fit that description. It is important to place these companies on your own watch list so that when the opportunity arises, you can purchase them with a greater margin of safety. It is our expectation that, at the most, only 1/3 of the companies that are part of our list will outperform the market over a one-year period.

Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.