Category Archives: NTRS

Our Primary Concern: Retaining Profits

We have frequently claimed that our goal was never to have trading strategy while dealing with dividend paying stocks.  In fact, the whole purpose of mining the field of dividend stocks is to increase the odds that we can compound our investment income.
However, a recent example reminds us of the importance of being cognizant that “good” stock selecting isn’t enough.  Adherence to Charles H. Dow’s concept of recognizing values and seeking fair profits is critical to long-term success in the stock market.
In the article titled “When Timing Meets Opportunity,” we’ve outlined the importance of timing when selecting stocks.  That article demonstrated that a focus on stocks near a new one-year low was about as good as any time for starting investment research.  Stocks at a new low represent the best marker for determining values.  Keep in mind that our focus is on stocks that increase their dividend every year or members of the Nasdaq 100.  Thereafter, an individual would need to run through whichever fundamental and technical analysis necessary to make a decision that seems appropriate.  Our philosophy is to consider our portfolio allocation based on what Dow Theory indicates.  If we’re in a bull market we have a higher concentration in a single stock.  If we’re in a bear market then we have lower concentration in a single stock. In general, this addresses the “value” component according to Charles H. Dow.
The aspect regarding seeking fair profits, another Charles Dow tenet, was outlined in our article titled “Seeking Fair Profits in Investment Portfolios.”  That article specifically references quotes by Charles Dow regarding when to take a profit on a stock.  Strangely, Dow recommended taking “fair profits” of 5%.  The New Low Observer Team is a little more adventurous since we seek 10% or more.  However, the point remains that as investors we need to put our expectations in perspective before we commit our money.  Not after we’re stuck with large gains or losses.
A recent example that we have come across is the case of Northern Trust (NTRS).  Northern Trust (NTRS) typifies what usually happens to a well-timed play on values when the appreciation for “fair profits” isn’t understood.  Northern Trust was recommended on September 1, 2010.  This was almost literally at the one year low from the period of September 1, 2009 to September 1, 2010.
After receiving “only” 10.96% in a period of 64 days, we issued a Sell recommendation on Northern Trust (NTRS) feeling that an annualized gain of nearly 40% wasn’t worth quibbling about.  In the sell recommendation, we indicated that we expected the upside target to be first $56 and thereafter $59.  Almost as impossible as it seems, Northern Trust peaked at $56.86 and turned down from there.  Nearly 7 months on, Northern Trust (NTRS) has ranged from a 19% gains to the current 4%. In addition, this represents a loss of nearly half of the gain that was generated at the time of our sell recommendation.
The situation with Northern Trust typifies our experience and observation when investing in dividend increasing stocks.  Great companies with considerable qualitative elements rise for a moment and revert back to their prior low for inexplicable reasons.  In regards to the general ebb and flow of individual stocks, we’re primarily concerned with accepting what is reasonable and fair rather than what we typically want which is usually for the stock to got back to the previous one-year high.
As rudimentary as it seems, we feel that an understanding of values and seeking fair profits, as espoused by Charles Dow, is essential to long-term success in the stock market.
Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.

Sell Northern Trust (NTRS) at the Market

It is now time to recommend that Northern Trust (NTRS) be sold at the market. The stock has performed moderately since the Investment Observation was issued on September 1, 2010. It is highly recommended that anyone who bought the stock based on our insight should re-read the posting. For the most part, Northern Trust retained the recommended market price and moved higher from there.
In the pursuit of "seeking fair profits" the returns that this stock has provided within the last 94 days say that it is necessary to consider alternative opportunities. The key to investment success and a key principle of economics is to seek the best alternatives.
Northern Trust (NTRS) was recommended when it closed at $47.26 on September 1st. Based on this morning’s price of $52.18, NTRS has gained 10.96% (including reinvested dividends.) By catching the stock eight days before the ex-dividend date, we were able to boost the total return from 10.41% to 10.96% a difference of 5.28%.
The annualized return on this position would be close to 43%. Selling this stock now generates a return of 4.62x greater than the amount of the dividend yield if held for a full year. Additionally, the 10.96% gain exceeds the return on a 30-year treasury purchased on September 1, 2010 by 3x.
Those not interested in following through with our sell recommendation can feel comfortable knowing that Northern Trust is a great long-term holding with a 10.96% downside cushion since our investment observation. As the price of NTRS rises, it should be noted that the stock faces significant upside resistance at $56 and $59.
As we have indicated in the purposes and function of this site, our goal is to:
  • Maximize the annual yield of each trade.
  • Reduce the time between buying and selling of each stock.
  • Exceed the annual yield of government guaranteed alternatives in each trade.
Investment observations are intended to be a starting point for investigating a quality company at a reasonable price. It is hoped that after doing the background research you can buy the stock at a lower price. Ideally the stock should be held in a tax-deferred account and should not consist of less than 20% of your holdings. Personally, we prefer holding only 2-3 stocks at a time.
For a portfolio of $10,000 with a 20% position that gains 10.96%, the impact on the entire portfolio is 2.19%. This is contrasted with the same portfolio with a 5% position that gains 10.96%, the impact on the entire portfolio is 0.548%. By choosing generally conservative dividend increasing stocks at or near a new low, the odds of success are increased in your favor making the assumed increase in risk worthwhile.
Sell recommendations are intended to deal with the short-term reality of the market. The tracking of the Sell recommendations are the worst case scenario if you happen to have bought a stock at the time the Investment Observation was made (please avoid making this mistake.) We aim for modest returns, therefore we are happy with 9-12% annualized gains.
It is always recommended that when selling a stock, one should not place stop orders, limit orders or orders after hours as detailed in our article "Automatic Orders Don't Provide Protection." This leaves the seller in the position of being vulnerable to the whims of the market makers. Instead, place your sell orders only as a market order during market hours. Some would complain that a market order during market hours might leave some profits on the table. However, we would rather leave some money on the table rather than have it taken away from us by the trades that are placed by institutions and market makers.
Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.

Dick Bove Tries to Salvage a Bad Call on Northern Trust

A hotly debated topic of the New Low Observer team is a note that came out on Monday October 4, 2010 (indicated in the green circle below) from renown Rochdale Securities banking analyst Dick Bove. Because we know that Mr. Bove hasn’t been very consistent or successful with his comments about the banking sector recently, we weren’t too sure how to take the commentary that “…Credit Suisse (CS) should buy Northern Trust.” After all, we had issued an Investment Observation of Northern Trust on September 1, 2010 (indicated in the purple circle below) indicating that regardless of the direction of the economy, Northern Trust (NTRS) would be among the leading banking/money management firms.
On one side of the debate, it was thought that Bove was implying that Northern Trust (NTRS) was undervalued and should be bought. On the other side of the debate, it was thought that maybe we overlooked something about NTRS and therefore we should reconsider our Investment Observation. Both views have their merit however the truth of the matter may be something else altogether.
It turns out that Dick Bove gave a buy recommendation of NorthernTrust (NTRS) on August 19, 2009 (indicated in the red circle below) when the stock price was at $59.92. As part of his recommendation of NTRS, Bove said that, “Northern Trust’s balance sheet is so strong it actually shames its competitors.” Almost as if on cue, the price of NTRS fell 20% by December. After falling to the $48 level, NTRS went right back to the $59 level in the next 4-month period, topping out in April of 2010. After the April top, NTRS fell as low as $46 in early July 2010.
It seems that the reality of Bove’s October 4, 2010 comments that Credit Suisse buy Northern Trust and that “[NTRS] management has no ability to withstand a takeover bid. Nor has [NTRS] management shown any skill in getting the price of the stock higher," is more of a reflection of an attempt to salvage a bad call or an unwillingness to “reiterate” his August 19, 2009 buy recommendation.
Our recommendation of Northern Trust (NTRS) at $47.26 still stands. In addition, for those who have already bought the stock, we recommend reconsidering additional purchases if the stock falls by 20% or more.

Investment Policy Q&A

A Reader Asks:
In reading "lessons learned from our worse picks", the key 'lesson' was 'not adhering to our rules', mainly "one rule is to side-step stocks that have had recent cuts or no annual increase in the dividend."
Yet, Northern [Trust] has had no increases in 3 years (so even before the crash).
I realize that one should not be totally dogmatic in an investment approach. Perhaps a large % of the "good" picks also showed similar dividend lags...but then why would it be "a rule"?
Our Response:
Thanks for the great observation. This site tracks current and former Dividend Achievers. This means that stocks that had a history of dividend increases will likely be included in our investment decisions at some point in the future, even if they don’t have a current history of dividend increases. We track companies that did have a history of dividend increases because cutting the dividend may have been done for strategic purposes.
One matter about the article titled “Lessons Learned From Our Worst Picks” is that we probably didn’t put enough emphasis on how recent a dividend policy has changed. We don’t mind if there isn’t an increase nor does it matter that there is a cut. What matters most is how recent such action took place and for what reason.
In the article mentioned above, we did say the following about cuts that occurred in stocks that we selected:
What we should have done is wait one full year after the cut, or lack of an increase, to determine the viability of the company. Keep in mind that a cut in the dividend isn’t a death sentence. In fact, cutting the dividend might be the best management move to make. However, current shareholders of the company might abandon the stock if they have a policy to hold stocks with a steady dividend (as we advise investors to do.)
Northern Trust (NTRS) happens to be the perfect example of our investment approach in action. Based on the history of dividend increases, Northern Trust was expected to increase the dividend on December 8, 2008. However, the economic environment, as uncertain as it was, did not warrant such actions from the board. The most prudent action was to conserve as much cash as possible.
It is interesting to note that according to Value Line Investment Survey, Northern Trust earned $3.24 per share in 2007 and $3.47 in 2008. Although the cash was available, NTRS made a prudent and accurate decision to maintain, rather than increase the dividend since 2009 earnings came in at $3.16. Despite a drop in earnings in 2009 and the economic turmoil of 2007 to 2009, the book value of NTRS has climbed from $20.44 in 2007 to $26.50 in 2009. A decision on the dividend that was made in 2008 anticipated the decrease in earnings in 2009 is what we should expect for a “well” run organization.
The management at Northern Trust (NTRS) continues to demonstrate a high level of competency that rewards the shareholders and account holders equally. First, by not overreaching as the bubble grew, NTRS avoided jeopardizing the well being of their clients. Second, by taking appropriate actions in response to the “crisis” that swirled around them by not increasing the dividend in order to conserve cash, NTRS positioned themselves to fight another day; which ultimately benefits the shareholders.
Historically, we have been reticent to make any recommendations of companies in the financial services industry, especially banks. However, the last three recommendations of Transatlantic Holdings (TRH), Wesco Financial (WSC) and Northern Trust (NTRS) have demonstrated an exceptional ability to weather the most recent storm.  These characteristics, not increasing or cutting the dividend before a crash, were demonstrated by some of the best corporations with similar dividend increasing histories before the crash of 1929.  This explains why we wouldn't rule out a company that has embarked on a new dividend policy.
Thank you for a great question and for carefully reading our material.

Investment Observation: Northern Trust (NTRS) at $47.26

Today’s Investment Observation is Northern Trust (NTRS). Although Northern Trust has not increased the dividend in the last couple of years, the company has an exceptional dividend history given the turmoil that has transpired in the financial services industry for the last 3 years. According to Value Line Investment Survey, “Northern Trust is a leading provider of investment management, asset and fund administration, fiduciary and banking solutions for institutions and affluent individuals worldwide.”
Based on Value Line’s June 18, 2010 issue, Northern Trust (NTRS) has a fair value of $63. The stock has had an increase in the number of shares outstanding by 7% since 1999. However, the book value for NTRS has increased by slightly less than 3 times (286%) since 1999. Although Value Line has NTRS with a timeliness rating at the lowest end of the scale, NTRS is expected to increase in value to $70 by 2013, which is an annualized total return of 11%.
According to Dow Theory, Northern Trust (NTRS) has the following downside targets:
  • $44.48
  • $38.84
  • $33.20
At the current price, the worst-case scenario of NTRS falling to $33.20 is 27.17%. In our investment strategy, declines of 25% would initiate the second of 3 purchases for either short-term speculators or long-term investors. The upside targets for this stock are:
  • $58.58 (fair value)
  • $70.71
  • $83.95
Edson Gould’s Altimeter indicates that while Northern Trust (NTRS) isn’t at the all time low, it may be forming a base in the stock’s price. At the current price of $41.47, NTRS hit a critical base (blue line) in March 2003 and December 2008. The short-term upside target is $62 as represented by the blue circle. The $62 mark coincides with Value Line’s $63 fair value price and Dow Theory’s fair value of $58.58. The most optimistic outlook for NTRS is for the stock price to rise to $83.85 as indicated by the green circle.
As a side bar, if NTRS were to rise as high as the September 2000 peak the stock would be priced at $156. However, we cannot, at this time, take the position that NTRS would rise to such a level of overvaluation unless and until the stock exceeds the $83.85 level.
Our worst-case scenario is that NTRS declines to the $28 level as represented by the red circle. We are adamantly against investors ruling out the prospect of losing at least 50% of their position. For this reason, NTRS falling to $28 is just as real in our minds as the prospect of rising to the $62 level.
As a potential sign of things to come, it was announced on Tuesday August 31, 2010 that Northern Trust was granted a Beijing branch license. Although the prospects of China have been a topic of much debate since Columbus tried to do an end run around Marco Polo’s silk road, we believe that Northern Trust is methodically positioning itself to reap rewards regardless of the rumors of China’s opportunities.

Odds and Ends

Question:
Do you think Richard Russell has been overrated regarding his abilities to forecast the directions of the markets? It seems like one good call (1975) allows one in his position to reap benefits for years despite demonstrating no skill when one goes back and, with the benefit of hindsight, takes a critical look at the entire record.
Our Thoughts:
Anyone, including NLO team, who attempts to predict the stock market is under extraordinary pressure. The challenge that Russell presents is that he often ignores that he has a bias towards the market falling rather than rising. This becomes a problem when, against his experience and better judgment, Dow Theory might be indicating that the direction is up despite all the negative market fundamentals.
Again, Dow Theory is supposed to include all the current and foreseeable hopes and fears as it relates money. I think that if Russell would follow Dow Theory or even his PTI indicator more often he would get a more accurate readings on the market.
It should be noted that within the content of his Dow Theory Letters from 1958 to the present, there are many great calls.  As I post more reviews of Russell’s letters, I will be able to point out too many instances of where Russell was spot on.
Unfortunately, Russell often didn’t stick to his guns or he forgot his earlier good advice or information. As an example, Russell talks about the importance of compounding. This cannot be accomplished if you’re buying and selling based on Dow Theory. Another example is Russell’s commentary on values. You can’t speak of values if you’re primarily focused on ETFs, index funds or stocks that don’t increase their dividends when plenty of them exist.
The pace and excitement of the markets become challenging for anyone to remain focused on the fundamentals. Russell has fallen astray of the basic principals of Dow Theory and value investing. Although the two seem mutually incompatible, there is a middle ground which Russell hasn’t attempted to address in all the years of his work.
Question:
I'm curious that you write "In my observations, market volume has increasingly become an addendum to Dow Theory." Meaning, only as a sidelight, or as an increasingly important variable? It does seem harder to judge given increased manipulation on light volume. Looks like lots of stick saves last week.
Answer:
It may be a function of the markets being driven by various large institutions (mutual funds, hedge funds, index funds, ETFs etc...) but volume seems to be less reliable when trying to determine sentiment and trends on the NYSE. I suspect that the diminished impact of smaller participants and derivative markets have had a lot to do with my concerns about volume not being a strong indicator. However, I will continue track volume just in case.
Question:
What did you do with the proceeds from the sale of WTR?
Answer:
After investing in WTR we recommended CEPH and SVU which generated 13% and 11% gains respectively. Both stocks were on our Watch Lists and in each case we accomplished our targets and made subsequent sell recommendations. In addition to our posted recommendations, we also participated in CWT and GENZ. Both positions accomplished our short-term after tax goals which allowed for the purchases of new stocks on our dividend Watch List.
Our article titled “Meridian Biosciences and Other Profitable Market Lessons” provides a framework for the strategy we’d like to employ when investing in Dividend Achievers. Another article that weighs heavily on our investment decisions is titled “It Isn’t Easy Being Green.” That article outlined Hetty Green’s approach to handling her funds when not invested in stocks. We’ve simply applied a similar strategy to Dividend Achievers and Nasdaq 100 stocks at a new low (after careful analysis).
Question:
Would you venture to provide a top pick from your current dividend achievers list?
Answer:
As you can tell, the current list has too many companies that are candidates for investment. Without providing any detailed analysis,  I would say that my top four choices for additional research would be Ritchie Bros Auctioneers (RBA), Northern Trust (NTRS), Dentsply (XRAY), and Meridian Biosciences (VIVO).  We expect, and hope, that the price of these stocks will fall further while we get more research in.  We're using the March 2009 low as our benchmark for all investment analysis going forward and we hope that you do the same.
Russell Blurb:
For what it is worth Richard Russell’s commentary today (July 12, 2010) seems to fly in the face of the commentary that he gave on Friday July 9, 2010. Go figure:

“The recent non-confirmation by the Transports may have served as an entry spot for bold speculators, but I doubt if the 2007 highs in the Averages will be approached or bettered. Nevertheless, we may see a brief period of better markets, a "breather" in the long life of the bear. I believe this primary bear market will extend into 2016.

A near-term marker or target is to see whether the Dow and the Transports can better their recent June highs. Those highs were 10450.64 for Industrials and 4467.25 for Transports. Write those figures down. I'm betting that the two D-J Averages will not be able to better the June highs. Let's wait and see.”

All I can say is, at least he indicated an upside target that matches the one we came up with yesterday.  Can't understand how he was so bullish on Friday and is now sounding so skeptical today.

Email our team here.