Category Archives: On This Date

On This Date: Richard Russell

On this date in 1980, Richard Russell said:

If You Leap, You Will Fall

“Let’s trot out an old but very useful market adage. It is that a trend is taken to continue in force until proved otherwise. We can be suspicious, we can hate the market, we can be out of the market, we can talk the market down to our friends and neighbors, but brother, we better not put out shorts until we have hard evidence that the bull trend is over and the bear is firmly in command-that is if we want to stay solvent (Russell, Richard. Dow Theory Letters. Letter 777. February 27, 1980. page 1.).”

Another way of saying the above is as follows:

“The wish must never be allowed to father the thought (Rhea, Robert. The Dow Theory. 1932. Barron’s Publishing. page 26.).”

Obviously staying solvent should be the primary goal.  However, you need not invest to “stay solvent.”  For all intents and purposes, even a person who “saves” in the traditional sense loses money by way of inflation and taxes. However, the fact that someone would chose to invest requires accepting that some or all money invested can be lost.

Most investors seem to get into the stock market or a specific stock because they think their investment will do well.  Seldom does an investor buy a stock hoping that it will lose money or languish.  Warren Buffett is among that rare group of (successful) investors who could make that claim.  In his annual report to shareholders, Buffett said the following:

“Our quiz for the day: What should a long-term shareholder, such as Berkshire, cheer for during that period? I won’t keep you in suspense. We should wish for IBM’s stock price to languish throughout the five years (source: 2011 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report. page 6).”

Maybe Buffett can “afford” to have such a cavalier attitude about a technology stock like IBM after not buying any tech stocks which has cemented him as the world’s premier investor.  However, we believe that having Buffett’s thought process could help in dealing with not allowing the wish to father the thought. Otherwise, the concept of investing and hoping becomes a feedback loop that ends with inaccurate conclusions such as, “I’m never investing in stocks again, it is a scam run by manipulators and thieves.  I’m going to put my money with an advisor and let her deal with the headache when I start ‘losing’ money.”

Continue reading

On This Date: IPO of a Nation

On this date in 1620, the (Plymouth) Council for New England was chartered by the king of England as a joint stock company with monopoly rights on (found here):

“…all the Breadth aforesaid throughout the Maine Land, from Sea to Sea [emphasis ours], with all the Seas, Rivers, Islands, Creekes, Inletts, Ports, and Havens, within the Degrees…”

image

The profits should be derived from (found here):

“…the Firme Lands, Soyles, Grounds Havens, Ports, Rivers, Waters, Fishings, Mines, and Mineralls, as well Royall Mines of Gold and Silver, as other Mine and Mineralls, precious Stones, Quarries, and all, and singular other Comodities, Jurisdictions, Royalties, Priveliges, Franchises, and Preheminences…”

The payments of those profits should be paid to (found here):

“…Us [England’s Royalty], our Heires, our Successors, the fifth [20%] Part, of the Ores of Gold and Silver, which from time to time, and aft all times hereafter, shall happen to be found, gotten, had, and obtained, in or within any the said Lands, Limitts, Territoryes, and Precincts, or in or within any Part or Parcell thereof, for, or in Respect of all, and all Manner of Dutys, Demands, and Services whatsoever, to be done, made, or paid to Us, our Heires, and Successors.…”

By 1635, the charter for the Council of New England was revoked.  However, within the time of the Council for New England’s existence, which later folded into the Massachusetts Bay Company and other corporate entities, the wheels of a new nation were put into motion.

On This Date: St. Paul Cuts Dividend

On this date in 1888, the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad skipped their dividend payment.  This led to the stock price “crashing” –7.87%.  It was indicated that net earnings declined from $3,662,930 in 1887 to $1,875,925 in 1888, approximately -48% year-over-year. According to the New York Times:

“Officers of the St. Paul Company, the same who have been dealing out rose-colored fictions for months past, were kept busy throughout the whole of the day endeavoring to explain why they had been pursuing such a deceptive course. (New York Times. “Wall-Street Stirred Up: Bulls, Bears, And Every Body Feared A Panic.  The Startling St. Paul Railroad Discoveries Proved a Sensation Indeed--The Stock's Big Drop.” September 14, 1888. page 2.).”

Apparently, St. Paul had a history of accounting that suggested the dividend cut was not, or should not have been, a shock.  According to the New York Times:

“The overwhelming losses in net earnings (at the rate of $3,500,000 a year) were not to be disguised by even the phenomenally remarkable bookkeeping methods that have made St. Paul statements the target for derision and denunciation for years past (New York Times. “The First to Confess: Wall-Street Is Treated To a Big Sensation. The St. Paul Railroad Forced By Bad Earnings To Abolish Dividends-Tremendous Losses”. September 13, 1888. page 1.).”

At the time, the cut in the dividend sent shockwaves through the market.  However, St. Paul happened to be the average underperforming railroad at the time, as indicated below:

source: New York Times. "Wall Street Talk". September 14, 1888. page 5.

On This Date: Richard Russell

On this date, Richard Russell of the Dow Theory Letters, said the following:

"Wall Street wisdom tells us that the most bullish thing the market can do is advance to new highs.

"Wrong--the most bullish thing a stock average can do is rally to a new high confirmed with the other averages and breadth. But that’s not what has been happening. The recent Dow/S&P highs were not confirmed by the Transports, the Utilities or the advance-decline ratio. In other words, the Dow/S&P advance to new highs was extremely “arrow, which is fine for people holding a handful of the stronger blue-chip stocks but frustrating, if not costly, for those holding a representative portfolio of stocks."

-Russell, Richard. Dow Theory Letters. July 29, 1998. Letter 1257. page 1.

image

On This Date: The Nipper Panic

On this date in 1901, the amazing ride known as the “Nipper Panic” ensued.  this was a day that began with rumors and ended with incredible market turmoil.

Northern Pacific Railroad was referred to as “Nipper” back in 1901.  On May 9, 1901, the price of Northern Pacific went from $160 to as high as $1,000 during the trading day, before settling at a price of $325 at the close.

What brought about such a panic?  Two syndicates, supposedly working in unison to elevate the price of Northern Pacific, had a difference in opinion as to what was considered “high” and “high enough.”

However, in order to gain a sense of perspective on the Nipper Panic, we need to look at what Northern Pacific was trading at in the year prior to May 1901.  On May 3, 1900,  Northern Pacific had the following quotes (New York Stock Exchange. New York Times. May 3, 1900. pg. 11):

  • Open: $57.75
  • High: $58.00
  • Low: $57.50
  • Close: $57.75

The above data indicates that the share price of Northern Pacific rose from $57.75 on May 3, 1900 to the closing price of $143.50 on May 7, 1901 (or +148.48%), shortly before the “panic” set in (New York Stock Exchange. New York Times. May 8, 1901. pg. 11.).

The way that syndicates worked, at the time, was a group of well-heeled investors (now called “accredited investor”)* proposed pushing the price of a stock up or down by informing the public of their plans after having bought a large share of a specific company.  With this information, depending the names of the people involved in the syndicate, the general public would place their bets on the direction of the stock, either long or short.

In this instance, the involved syndicates were the Harriman and Hill-Morgan.  Initially, the Hill-Morgan and Harriman syndicates were pushing up the share increase of Northern Pacific.  However, at a certain point, some members of the Hill-Morgan syndicate felt that the shares had risen “enough” and began, in opposition of the syndicate, to sell their shares.

Meanwhile, the Harriman syndicate had automatic orders to buy any and all shares of Northern Pacific as soon as they became available.  Being such large shareholders, market makers were more than glad to have a willing buyer at any price and put the shares to Harriman.

Unfortunately, the illiquidity of the market not having enough sellers to offset buyers caused the shares of Northern Pacific to attain the $1,000 level.  The carnage imposed on the sellers/short sellers was only relieved once the syndicate participants agreed to ease their automatic buying and selling program.

This is why my econ professor emphasized that cartels don’t work in the long run (see OPEC).  Someone is always going to get greedy and ultimately reneg on the agreed upon terms (see Saudi/Russian Oil price war).  Not mentioned in that awesome econ class is that one party in the cartel will end up bruised and beaten beyond recognition while the other side could be considered a “winner” (see U.S./Canadian oil producers).

In this case, the breakaway members of the Hill-Morgan syndicate not only sold but they short-sold the shares of Northern Pacific.  The brutality of the shares rising from $143.50 to $1,000 and then closing at $325.00 had to leave a mark.

image

Other data from the changes in price from May 8, 1901 to May 9, 1901:

image

see also:

*Notes:

  • The topic of the "accredited" or “sophisticated investor” was addressed in our September 2, 2011 article titled “There is no such thing as a Sophisticated Investor.”