Members
-
Topics
Archives
-
-
Recent Posts
-
-
Investor Education
Market Return After Exceptional Years
Dollar Cost Averaging Tool
Dow Theory: The Formation of a Line
Dividend Capture Strategy Analysis
Golden Cross – How Golden Is It?
Debunked – Death Cross
Work Smart, Not Hard
Charles H. Dow, Father of Value Investing
It's All About the Dividends
Dow Theory: Buying in Scales
How to Avoid Losses
When Dividends are Canceled
Cyclical and Secular Markets
Inflation Proof Myth
What is Fair Value?
Issues with P-E Ratios
Beware of Gold Dividends
Gold Standard Myth
Lagging Gold Stocks?
No Sophisticated Investors
Dollar down, Gold up?
Problems with Market Share
Aim for Annualized Returns
Anatomy of Bear Market Trade
Don’t Use Stop Orders
How to Value Earnings
Low Yields, Big Gains
Set Limits, Gain More
Ex-Dividend Dates -
-
Historical Data
1290-1950: Price Index
1670-2012: Inflation Rate
1790-1947: Wholesale Price Cycle
1795-1973: Real Estate Cycle
1800-1965: U.S. Yields
1834-1928: U.S. Stock Index
1835-2019: Booms and Busts
1846-1895: Gold/Silver Value
1853-2019: Recession/Depression Index
1860-1907: Most Active Stock Average
1870-2033: Real Estate Cycles
1871-2020: Market Dividend Yield
1875-1940: St. Louis Rents
1876-1934: Credit-New Dwellings
1896-1925: Inflation-Stocks
1897-2019: Sentiment Index
1900-1903: Dow Theory
1900-1923: Cigars and Cigarettes
1900-2019: Silver/Dow Ratio
1901-2019: YoY DJIA
1903-1907: Dow Theory
1906-1932: Barron's Averages
1907-1910: Dow Theory
1910-1913: Dow Theory
1910-1936: U.S. Real Estate
1910-2016: Union Pacific Corp.
1914-2012: Fed/GDP Ratio
1919-1934: Barron's Industrial Production
1920-1940: Homestake Mining
1921-1939: US Realty
1922-1930: Discount Rate
1924-2001: Gold/Silver Stocks
1927-1937: Borden Co.
1927-1937: National Dairy Products
1927-1937: Union Carbide
1928-1943: Discount Rate
1929-1937: Monsanto Co.
1937-1969: Intelligent Investor
1939-1965: Utility Stocks v. Interest Rates
1941-1967: Texas Pacific Land
1947-1970: Inventory-Sales Ratio
1948-2019: Profits v. DJIA
1949-1970: Dow 600? SRL
1958-1976: Gold Expert
1963-1977: Farmland Values
1971-2018: Nasdaq v. Gold
1971-1974: REIT Crash
1972-1979: REIT Index Crash
1986-2018: Hang Seng Index Cycles
1986-2019: Crude Oil Cycles
1999-2017: Cell Phone Market Share
2008: Transaction History
2010-2021: Bitcoin Cycles -
Interesting Read
Inside a Moneymaking Machine Like No Other
The Fuzzy, Insane Math That's Creating So Many Billion-Dollar Tech Companies
Berkshire Hathaway Shareholder Letters
Forex Investors May Face $1 Billion Loss as Trade Site Vanishes
Why the oil price is falling
How a $600 Million Hedge Fund Disappeared
Hedge Fund Manager Who Remembers 1998 Rout Says Prepare for Pain
Swiss National Bank Starts Negative
Tice: Crash is Coming...Although
More on Edson Gould (PDF)
Schiller's CAPE ratio is wrong
Double-Digit Inflation in the 1970s (PDF)
401k Crisis
Quick Link Archive
Category Archives: speed resistance line
Carlisle Companies
Posted in CSL, downside, Edson Gould, speed resistance line, SRL
Wolverine World Wide
Posted in downside, Edson Gould, speed resistance line, SRL, Wolverine World Wide, WWW
Quick Take: Helmerich & Payne
It is clear that the commodity market is in the dumps. The chart below outlines the course of the Bloomberg Commodity Index since the July 2008 peak.
With the decline that has occurred in the index, it would be obvious to any long-term investor that there are values to be had. Yeah, there are risks but we’re investors not savers (anyone confused about the difference between saving and investing? Savers expect the money to be there no matter what, investors are taking the risk that more or less will be there, after the passage of time). One idea that we think is worth entertaining (or researching) is a stock that we’ve followed for many years.
Posted in Edson Gould, Helmerich & Payne, Quick Take, speed resistance line, SRL
Netflix Downside Targets
It’s that time again. We’re going to see what the effectiveness of Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) is in predicting the downside for Netflix (NFLX). But first we’re going to review the last time that we ran an SRL on Netflix. The very first time we ran numbers on NFLX was on December 3, 2010 when the stock was trading at the pre-split price of $185.45.
At the time, we were testing out the quality of Gould’s work. We came up with a conservative downside target of $117.76 and an extreme downside target of $68.63. The most challenging part of the assessment was the fact that Netflix increased +50% before achieving the first downside target.
A follow-up review of the SRL on Netflix was done on September 22, 2011 where we had the following to say:
“…in reviewing the chart pattern of Netflix (NFLX), we have the peak of NFLX at $298.73. The conservative estimate for the stock is that it would fall to $148 which has already taken place. The extreme downside target would be $99.58. Because of the nature of the rise, we believe that Netflix (NFLX) is slated to fall at least to the $99.58 level.”
At the time, we proposed that NFLX would decline at least -66% from the peak of $298.73. The actual decline was -79.89%. Will it happen again? We don’t know. However, if it does, there will be good buying opportunities ahead.
Posted in Edson Gould, NFLX, speed resistance line, SRL
Oil and Gas Stock Index Update
On January 6, 2015, we said the following about the NYSE Oil and Gas Stock Index (XOI):
“The conservative downside target of 1,454.79 has been constructed while the mid-point of 1,015.10 is also indicated. However, we did not include the extreme downside target of 575.41. We did indicate in red the 812.08 level which was the extent of the decline in the period from the 2008 high to the 2009 low.
“Suffice to say that we expect the XOI index could easily fall to 1,015.10 and subsequently to the 812.08. Those interested in the oil sector should start initiating positions at or below the ascending 1,015.10 level. ”
At the time, the NYSE Oil and Gas Stock Index was trading at 1,287.66. The September 4, 2015, XOI close was 1,085.81, down –15.67%. At least from the perspective of the last posting, the SRL achieved the expected downside target.
However, lurking in the background is the extreme downside target of 575.41. Since our experience has been that the extreme downside target is commonly achieved, we hazard to guess what would happen globally to the oil market in order to decline to such a low point.
For now, we’ll resign ourselves to the idea that the 812.08 is the next downside target. If that target is achieved we believe that the 575.41 level is highly achievable. Given our concern for the downside risk, oil sector stocks should be bought in three stages at 958, 812 & 575.
Posted in downside, Edson Gould, speed resistance line, SRL, XOI
Baidu: Downside Targets
On April 27, 2013, we wrote a short piece on Baidu (BIDU) that concluded with the following remark:
“The conservative downside target of $93.43 has been achieved and we are now sitting at the extreme downside target of $54.79. All indications, based on the SRL, are that Baidu is worth considering in a two stage purchase plan, once at the current level and again at $67 or lower.”
The chart that we included for the above assessment was based on the work of Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) and is shown below.
Since that recommendation to buy at $85, Baidu had increased to as high as $251. What was not included at the time was the upside targets based on the work of Edson Gould. At that time, the upside targets were:
-
$140.16 (conservative target)
-
$210.23 (mid target)
-
$280.31 (extreme target)
Baidu was able to achieve two of the three upside targets that were indicated for the stock based on the interpretation of Gould’s work. With the Chinese stock market experiencing significant turmoil, Baidu has declined from the $251 level to the current price of $144 making a review of the technicals useful.
Baidu Downside Targets
Below is the updated Speed Resistance Lines based on the work of Edson Gould:
Posted in BIDU, downside, Edson Gould, speed resistance line, SRL, upside target
Shanghai Composite Index: Upside Target
On August 26, 2015, the Shanghai Composite Index traded as low as 2,850.71. While the most recent rise may only be a bear market rally, we think that resistance to the rise might kick in around the 4,400 level. Rising above 4,4oo would suggest that a run to the previous peak of 5,166.35 is not out of the question. Keep in mind that a bull market in this index is not confirmed until the index exceeds the prior high, until that time the Shanghai Composite is in a bear market rally.
Shanghai Composite Index: Where To Now?
On August 23, 2015, we said the following:
“The next move in the price to the downside should confirm the downside move or indicate the ongoing battle between buyers and sellers. The point indicated as the critical support will reveal the overall short-term direction of the index. Although the move up or down is academic, it is the size of the move that will be most fascinating as we believe it will be massive.”
So far, the Shanghai Composite Index (SSE) has confirmed that the direction of the index is down, now it is only a matter of magnitude. Already the Shanghai Composite Index has reached the mid-range downside target of 2,867.34.
A large bounce at this level is hoped for as a continuation of the declining trend could spark a genuine panic. If an upside bounce were to occur at this level, the SSE would face resistance at the ascending conservative downside target of 4,012.56. It would be a +48% rise to the 4,400 ascending conservative downside target from the close of August 25, 2015.
The flip side of a reversal to the upside is a decline to the extreme downside target of 1,722.12. Our breakdown of the potential reversal points are as follows:
-
2,450
-
2,100
-
1,722
The actions of the Chinese government have not been constructive for a change in the declining trend of the market. The sooner restrictions intended to stop prices from falling are lifted the better the chance for Chinese stocks to fully recover. The more involved the government becomes in the stock market the more we believe that 1,722 on the SSE is likely to occur.
Shanghai Composite Index: Downside Targets
The index to watch in the coming week is the Shanghai Composite Index (SSE) as it represents the raw emotions of the stock market in China. Below we have applied Edson Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines [SRL] to the SSE to determine the potential downside targets to watch for.
The SRL is ideally suited for a stock or index that has experienced a parabolic move to the upside. When viewed from a historical perspective, the Shanghai Index meets the criteria of entering the entropy stage.
Already the Shanghai Composite Index has declined below the conservative downside target of 4,012.56. The July 23, 2015 upside failure coincided with the ascending conservative target. This is the first true test of weakness in the upside move. The next move in the price to the downside should confirm the downside move or indicate the ongoing battle between buyers and sellers. The point indicated as the critical support will reveal the overall short-term direction of the index. Although the move up or down is academic, it is the size of the move that will be most fascinating as we believe it will be massive.
Because the Shanghai Composite Index has a history of parabolic rises and subsequent crashes, our guess is that declining to the 1,722.12 level should be expected. In addition, if the SSE were to replicate the previous rise and fall in the period from 2005 to 2008, the index could drop as low as 1,447.37.
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters: On Target
On May 19, 2015, we did a downside review of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) based on the work of Edson Gould. At the time, GMCR was trading at $88.69. Our downside assessment was as follows:
“As can be seen above, the price of GMCR has declined below the conservative and mid-range downside targets of $110.08 and $81.40. The acceleration of the current decline seems to indicate that achieving the $52.71 extreme downside target is very likely.”
On August 6, 2015, GMCR declined as low as $52.40. This falls well within the indications that were provided by Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines [SRL] at $52.71. We closed our downside assessment of GMCR with the following comment:
“The fact that GMCR is prone to extreme moves up and down suggests that the extreme downside target is the point at which to start assessing risk and accumulating shares.”
Now that GMCR has fallen below the extreme downside target of $52.71, we think now is the time to review GMCR as a going concern for a potential transaction.
The Setup
Assuming that an investor is willing to accept total loss of funds, now is a great time to review the fundamentals of GMCR and determine if it will survive on its own or ultimately get acquired. Below is the updated SRL based on the work of Edson Gould.
Our best guess is that buying GMCR in three stages on the way down is the most “prudent” approach. For those interested in the stock but don’t like the prospect of catching a falling knife, we’ve outlined three potential starting points for investment at $40.66, $31.33 and $23.04. We’d suggest investments of 50%, 25% and 25% of allotted funds.
Again, this recommendation is not for the faint of heart. Additionally, it is safest to assume all money put to this stock are a total loss and requires a significant amount of due diligence before any commitment is made. From a historical standpoint, a retest of the prior low ($17.25) is not unusual.
Chesapeake Energy is on Target
On April 26, 2012, we posted an article titled “A Warning For Chesapeake Energy Stockholders”. In that article we said the following:
“While it appears that Chesapeake Energy (CHK) has seen all the punishment that could possibly lay ahead, we’re concerned that the previous technical pattern in the period from 1993 to 1999 is about to repeat.”
The period from 1993 to 1999 saw (CHK) decline from as high as $27 to under $1.00. The 2012 article was written when CHK was at $18.10 and had already fallen more than –66%. So far, CHK is on track to replicate the decline achieved from 1993-1999. The next downside target for Chesapeake Energy is $4.50.
Posted in CHK, downside, Edson Gould, speed resistance line, SRL
Hospitality Properties Trust Downside Target
We’re always hopeful and expectant about the future prospects of any investment that we make. However, that doesn’t mean that we’re going to ignore the most pressing matter when investing which is assessing the downside risk. Below is the downside risk assessment for Hospitality Properties Trust (HPT) based on the work of Edson Gould.
The first tool of Gould is the Altimeter. This assesses a stock based on the stock price relative to the dividend that is paid. In this case, HPT has come off of a recent high near 70. This high matched the high of late 2006, the subsequent decline brought the stock price down nearly –80%. We don’t think that it is realistic to believe that HPT will decline as in the period from 2006 to 2008. However, we’ve outlined in red a low that we feel is reasonable if a decline were to take place. This low is at the $21 level where there appears to be a common retracement point.
If worse comes to worse, HPT could decline to point A or $13.00. If a repeat of the housing crisis were to take place then HPT could decline as low as point B or $4.67.
The other tool that Gould used was the Speed Resistance Line [SRL]. The SRL is ideal for stocks that increase significantly out of proportion to the general stock market. As HPT has increased nearly twice that of the S&P 500, we feel that the SRL is the most appropriate assessment for downside risk.
In this case, the SRL indicates that the conservative downside target is $26.22. In the previous decline of 2006 to 2008, HPT declined to the previous low set in 1999 at slightly below $5.00. However, as we mentioned before, we don’t think that this time is anything like the rise and fall of the housing bubble. Therefore, we’re looking for HPT to successfully breach the $26.22 level and retrace to the $18.86 level before a possible rebound. Our experience has been for HPT to adhere to the ascending lines for most stocks that we have covered in the past.
Who is Edson Gould?
"Edson Gould spent over 60 years working in and studying financial markets. Gould studied the arts at Princeton, engineering at Lehigh (from where he graduated in 1922), and finance at New York University. In 1922, after working for a short time at Western Electric, he joined Moody's Investor Service as an analyst and later was editor of Moody's Stock Survey, Bond Survey, and Advisory Reports. In 1948, he began at Arthur Wiesenberger & Company, where he developed and edited the well-known Wiesenberger Investment Report and became a senior partner. He also was Research Director at E. B. Smith (which later became Smith Barney), and worked for Nuveen."
(source: Market Technicians Association. Gould, Edson Beers, Knowledge Base. Accessed April 26, 2012. link MTA reference.)
"Market technician Edson Gould always laughed at the idea of having a significant influence on the stock market, but his predictions were the most precise around. He pinpointed major bull markets and prophesied bottom-out markets as if he had his own peephole into the future. But in place of a crystal ball and wacky off-the-cuff schemes, his were smart, intensely researched and time-tested theories that made him a legend in the investment community."
(source: Fisher, Kenneth L.. 100 Minds That Made the Market. Business Classics, Woodside, CA. 1993. page 320.)
Posted in Altimeter, Edson Gould, HPT, speed resistance line, SRL
GMCR: Downside Targets
On October 25, 2011 when Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) was trading at $63.85, we projected conservative and extreme downside targets of $59.93 and $37.21, respectively. Subsequent price action for the stock brought the price as low as $17.11. After achieving the downside target the stock rose as high as $158.87 by November 2014. The potential gains of acquiring GMCR below either downside target was +165% and +326%.
The problem with this modeling of the past is having the fortitude of buying the stock and watching it fall –66% before the subsequent rise. Can you handle a decline of –50% or more in your investments? If you can’t sleep at night with losses of –50% or more then don’t bother reading any further as what follows is speculation of what would happen if history were to repeat (NOTE: history does not repeat).
Alternate reading on portfolio losses of –50% or more by Charlie Munger.
Posted in Edson Gould, GMCR, speed resistance line, SRL