Category Archives: stock analysts

Relying On Analyst? Better Think Again

If you think an analyst can help guide you through investing, think again. Today's headline reads, "Bartels Drops ‘Correction’ Call, Sees Gains: Technical Analysis" Mary Ann Bartels, an analyst at Bank of America, predicted back in October 5th that the market would plunge 20%. Bartels was ranked second among analyst by Institutional Investor magazine’s most recent survey. The worse part about this is that being wrong, as an analyst, suffer no consequence. Bartels is now near-term bullish and saying that more gains are likely in the near term.
I wrote several articles about the market in October of 2009. The first one was on the 9th which showed a non-confirmation based on the Dow Theory. I suggested investors to stay long but flat and watch the Transport closely. On the 14th, the uptrend confirmation came and I said "The bull market confirmation came today when the Industrial and the Transport both closed above their previous high. I'll remain long until the market tells me to get out."
Art

Reviewing the Stock Analysts

When I came up with the idea of writing about stock analysts, I thought about many of the negatives that I've observed over the years. After all, I've seen analyst ratings go from a buy to a hold overnight. In other instances, I've seen ratings on stocks lowered the same day that the stock was crashing. Analyst ratings never seemed to match up with the concept of offering foresight or depth of knowledge.

In doing my research on stock analysts, I realized that instead of focusing on those who got it wrong in their upgrades and downgrades, I would try to find those who got it right. This turned out to be like searching for a needle in a haystack. So many analysts were unclear on their ratings that I couldn't really use recommendations like neutral, accumulate, market perform and outperform.

Additionally, I couldn't use buy recommendations since they were a dime a dozen and possibly had more to do with investment banking relationships. For this reason, I was forced to track only the stock recommendations that had sell ratings. Sell recommendations comprise only 5% of all ratings issued. The performance of such ratings are easier to track with clear instructions of what to do with the stock and little in the way of issues like conflict of interest with a buy rating.

What I found was enlightening and refreshing. I found the sell recommendation of Select Comfort (SCSS) issued on August 30, 2007 by Matrix USA, LLC. Naturally, SCSS fell from the high of $17.09 to the most recent 52-week low of $0.19. The decline equaled 98.9% and has only risen to $3.25 as of August 28, 2009.

Clearly I was shooting ducks in a barrel because I went straight to where I knew the market was topping out to find clear sell recommendations. However, it is precisely the top of the market where few analysts are willing to issue outright sell recommendations.

When I looked for a little background on Matrix USA, I learned that it had already been a leader in quality buy and sell recommendations. Unfortunately, you cannot find Matrix USA LLC any longer but the former managing director Daniello Natoli was found to be working at EVA Dimensions LLC. Stern Stewart, Founder and CEO of EVA Dimensions, is the author of the book Quest for Value which outlines the principles behind economic value added (EVA) measurements for publicly traded companies. EVA is the model that helped Matrix USA LLC build a successful string of buy and sell recommendations.

Apparently, Matrix USA LLC no longer exists, however the ability to issue solid buy and sell recommendations makes the method that they utilized well worth investigating. This would be one time I could honestly say that the book Quest for Value might be a good "investment." Touc.

Please revisit Dividend Inc. for editing and revisions to this post.