Members
-
Topics
Archives
-
-
Recent Posts
-
-
Investor Education
Market Return After Exceptional Years
Dollar Cost Averaging Tool
Dow Theory: The Formation of a Line
Dividend Capture Strategy Analysis
Golden Cross – How Golden Is It?
Debunked – Death Cross
Work Smart, Not Hard
Charles H. Dow, Father of Value Investing
It's All About the Dividends
Dow Theory: Buying in Scales
How to Avoid Losses
When Dividends are Canceled
Cyclical and Secular Markets
Inflation Proof Myth
What is Fair Value?
Issues with P-E Ratios
Beware of Gold Dividends
Gold Standard Myth
Lagging Gold Stocks?
No Sophisticated Investors
Dollar down, Gold up?
Problems with Market Share
Aim for Annualized Returns
Anatomy of Bear Market Trade
Don’t Use Stop Orders
How to Value Earnings
Low Yields, Big Gains
Set Limits, Gain More
Ex-Dividend Dates -
-
Historical Data
1290-1950: Price Index
1670-2012: Inflation Rate
1790-1947: Wholesale Price Cycle
1795-1973: Real Estate Cycle
1800-1965: U.S. Yields
1834-1928: U.S. Stock Index
1835-2019: Booms and Busts
1846-1895: Gold/Silver Value
1853-2019: Recession/Depression Index
1860-1907: Most Active Stock Average
1870-2033: Real Estate Cycles
1871-2020: Market Dividend Yield
1875-1940: St. Louis Rents
1876-1934: Credit-New Dwellings
1896-1925: Inflation-Stocks
1897-2019: Sentiment Index
1900-1903: Dow Theory
1900-1923: Cigars and Cigarettes
1900-2019: Silver/Dow Ratio
1901-2019: YoY DJIA
1903-1907: Dow Theory
1906-1932: Barron's Averages
1907-1910: Dow Theory
1910-1913: Dow Theory
1910-1936: U.S. Real Estate
1910-2016: Union Pacific Corp.
1914-2012: Fed/GDP Ratio
1919-1934: Barron's Industrial Production
1920-1940: Homestake Mining
1921-1939: US Realty
1922-1930: Discount Rate
1924-2001: Gold/Silver Stocks
1927-1937: Borden Co.
1927-1937: National Dairy Products
1927-1937: Union Carbide
1928-1943: Discount Rate
1929-1937: Monsanto Co.
1937-1969: Intelligent Investor
1939-1965: Utility Stocks v. Interest Rates
1941-1967: Texas Pacific Land
1947-1970: Inventory-Sales Ratio
1948-2019: Profits v. DJIA
1949-1970: Dow 600? SRL
1958-1976: Gold Expert
1963-1977: Farmland Values
1971-2018: Nasdaq v. Gold
1971-1974: REIT Crash
1972-1979: REIT Index Crash
1986-2018: Hang Seng Index Cycles
1986-2019: Crude Oil Cycles
1999-2017: Cell Phone Market Share
2008: Transaction History
2010-2021: Bitcoin Cycles -
Interesting Read
Inside a Moneymaking Machine Like No Other
The Fuzzy, Insane Math That's Creating So Many Billion-Dollar Tech Companies
Berkshire Hathaway Shareholder Letters
Forex Investors May Face $1 Billion Loss as Trade Site Vanishes
Why the oil price is falling
How a $600 Million Hedge Fund Disappeared
Hedge Fund Manager Who Remembers 1998 Rout Says Prepare for Pain
Swiss National Bank Starts Negative
Tice: Crash is Coming...Although
More on Edson Gould (PDF)
Schiller's CAPE ratio is wrong
Double-Digit Inflation in the 1970s (PDF)
401k Crisis
Quick Link Archive
Category Archives: three step rule
2021 Nasdaq Composite Downside Targets
Below are the downside targets for the Nasdaq Composite. Continue reading
Real Estate: Has the Low Been Seen?
New one family homes sold for the month of May 2020 was reported today and it looks like the low has been reached. The year-over-year perspective belies the image conveyed in the absolute change which is far from the 2005 peak.
Absolute Change
There is little need to expect that the prior absolute increase needs to be achieved (1,389 on July 2005). However, it is no coincidence that we see some kind of reaction within a long-term rising trend at a similar level during the 1990 to 2005 increase. The two prior reactions broke the rising trend into three separate periods as noted by Edson Gould’s Three Steps Rule:
Three steps up in an advancing market and three steps down in a declining market usually exhaust the bullish potential accumulated at the bottoms and the bearish potential accumulated at tops- but sometimes there is a fourth step (Edson Gould Reports. Edson Gould’s 1975 Forecast. November, 1974. page 8. ).
When we speak of the “long-term” rising trend, we’re referencing our December 9, 2010 article titled “Real Estate: The Verdict Is In” and the subsequent updates since 2010 which is primarily based on the work of Roy Wenzlick.
Year over Year Change
The year-over-year (YoY) change shows that a reversal of the trend within a NBER recession has typically meant a reaction to a 27%-30% change at some point down the road. We’re currently at 12.66% in the YoY change in New One Family Homes Sold so there should be some room to the upside before the current recession ends and the next recession begins.
As always, prepare for the worst as the current pandemic will not start the second wave until after the one year anniversary of the first wave.
See Also:
Posted in Edson Gould, real estate, three step rule, Wenzlick
Anheuser-Busch InBev SRL
In our previous work, we have outlined the impact of dividends and the historical precedent related to the qualitative elements of Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD). Why have we put so much focus on ONLY one fundamental element as it relates to a stock and its future prospects. As stated by Geraldine Weiss in her book Dividends Don’t Lie:
“The philosophy that the dividend yield of a quality company can reveal volumes about a stock’s future performance does not lend itself merely to a certain tax climate or a particular market cycle. It is a basic principal. one that serves as a faithful guide through even the most confounding stock market phases (page 10).”
Many argue that such a narrow perspective on esoteric points regarding the dividend doesn’t tell the whole story. Our writing on this topic since calling the bull market in 2009, and starting this site, highlights the exceptional consistency of the perspective that we have offered.
Price Reveals Fundamentals, Fundamentals Reveal Price
According to Charles H. Dow, co-founder of the Wall Street Journal and creator of the indexes that bear his name:
"The one sure thing in speculation is that values determine prices in the long run. Manipulation is effective temporarily, but the investor establishes price in the end. The object of all speculation is to foresee coming changes in values. Whoever knows that the value of a stock has run ahead of price and is likely to be sustained can buy that stock with confidence that as its value is recognized by investors, the price will rise (Dow, Charles H. Review and Outlook. Wall Street Journal. February 25, 1902.)."
With this in mind, we will venture into the indication that are provided by the activity of the price for Anheuser-Busch InBev.
Downside Speed Resistance Lines
Below are the Downside Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) covering the period from July 2009 to November 2019.
The downside targets based on the data from 2009 to the present are:
-
$94.20 (conservative)
-
$69.34 (mid-range)
-
$44.48 (extreme)
We can see that BUD has managed to decline through the conservative and mid-range targets. All that remains is the extreme downside target of between $44.48 and $47.70. The lack of historical precedent does not allow for the richer analysis of the price that we’d normally like to do. Such analysis makes for what we believe would be better interpretation of the price activity.
Three Steps Rule
In addition to Gould’s Speed Resistance Lines, there is the theory of the Three Steps Rule. According to Gould:
Our Three Step Rule (not to be confused with our Three Step and Stumble Rule, Which refers only to monetary conditions) has been helpful over the years in our attempt to project stock market moves and to anticipate stock market tops and bottoms.
Our Three Step Rule says: In any stock market move, up or down, large or small or in between, expect three steps but be prepared for a fourth.
It applies to large moves as well as small moves.
Three steps up in an advancing market and three steps down in a declining market usually exhaust the bullish potential accumulated at the bottoms and the bearish potential accumulated at tops- but sometimes there is a fourth step (Edson Gould Reports. Edson Gould’s 1975 Forecast. November, 1974. page 8. ).
We have included, in the chart above, the Three Steps (red circles). In this case, the third “step” cannot occur unless it is at some point below the second “step.”
Upside Speed Resistance Lines
Below are the Upside Speed Resistance Lines (SRL) for Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) covering the period from September 2016 to November 2019.
The upside targets based on the data from 2016 to the present are:
-
$99.44
-
$111.00
-
$122.22
As with downside prospects there must be upside resistance. From the all-time low set in late 2018, BUD has managed to climb as high as $101.58. However, not achieving the $111.00 upside resistance and then falling below the $99.44 upside resistance level suggests, at minimum, a re-test of the $65.43 level.
Speed Resistance Lines are based on the work of Edson Gould who was famous for precisely calling market tops and bottoms and widely quoted in Barron’s throughout the 1970’s. How powerful are the indications provided by Gould’s SRL?
Among the many posting we have on the topic, our April 26, 2012 on the downside risk for Chesapeake Energy (CHK) titled “A Warning for Chesapeake Shareholders” suggested that although the stock was trading at $18.10, CHK could potentially decline as low $0.67 as a normal reaction to the prior peak. On November 12, 2019, CHK had a closing price of $0.67.
Posted in BUD, Edson Gould, Speed Resistance Lines, SRL, three step rule
Aflac Inc.: Downside Price and Timing Targets
On January 11, 2018, in an article titled “Behind the Duck: Former Aflac Employees Allege Fraud and Abuse in Nearly Every Aspect of Company” published by The Intercept, it is alleged that Aflac (AFL) “…has exploited workers, manipulated its accounting, and deceived shareholders and customers, according to nine former employees.”
These allegations have had a material impact on the stock price of Aflac on January 12, 2018. Currently, the stock is down –7% on the day. Below are the downside price and timing targets of AFL based on the Speed Resistance Lines since the 2009 low.