Category Archives: WL

ConAgra Counterpoint

We love corporate news that is bad. There are few times when anything can be learned through good news, at least not as much as what can be learned with “bad” news.
Recently there was an article titled “Nothing Appetizing About ConAgra” published on Investopedia.com that was unrelenting in the bad news regarding the future prospects of our recent Investment Observation on the same company. So thorough, and yet concise, was the article that we feel it is a must read.
Along with all the negative prospects for ConAgra, there was one morsel of information which happens to confirm our view of what ConAgra might be worth. In the sixth paragraph of the article, it says the following:
Assuming that private equity buyers could wring some efficiencies and cost savings from this business, a deal worth $28 to $30 could be achievable.”
In our Investment Observation of ConAgra (CAG) dated December 1, 2010, we indicated that using several different approaches, we were able to arrive at a “fair value” of $30. All things cannot go our way with our investment recommendations, so if we were to assume the stock to rise at least to the midpoint between the current price of $22.40 and the expected fair value of $30, then we’d get a gain of 17%. Despite having opposite views on the prospects for the company, there is common ground as to the possible valuation of the company.
We’re reticent to believe that taking the company private, which will then lead to taking the company public at some point down the road, will truly cure what ails ConAgra (CAG). In fact, the history of private equity, from one man's perspective, has been abysmal for companies ensnared in such transactions. The recent book by Josh Kosman titled The Buyout of America details the history of such deals and the subsequent impact on the respective company and their employees.
As we’ve shown in the example of Wilmington Trust (WL), market analyst estimates, including our own, can be usurped by realities beyond our purview. Therefore, despite our take on the prospects for this company, we still recommend “Nothing Appetizing About ConAgra.” It provides the right antidote to our recommendation to consider ConAgra (CAG) as a possible investment candidate.

Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.

The End of Wilmington Trust (WL)

In its heyday, Wilmington Trust (WL) garnered considerable respect in the wealth management industry.  In fact, Wilmington Trust had increased its dividend for 27 years in a row until April 2009. Wilmington, a wealth management firm with a growing banking presence, became mired in troubled real estate construction loans that went bad as the financial markets unwound in 2007. After a TARP injection of $330 million and a capital raise of $274 million, Wilmington found itself in need of a savior.
In an October 16, 2010 article in Barron’s titled “A Bank on the Brink” by Erin Arvedlund, the future prospects of Wilmington Trust (WL) are covered in great detail. At the time of the article, Wilmington Trust was trading at $7.79. Barron’s asked Dick Bove banking analyst for Rochdale Research and Andy Stapp of B. Riley and Co. their view on the prospects for Wilmington Trust.
Dick Bove indicated that Wilmington Trust (WL) management “would rather shoot themselves than sell” to another institution, adding that “they may have no choice.” Bove said that Northern Trust (NTRS), a company profiled as an Investment Observation on our site, was among the potential acquirers of Wilmington. In the final analysis, Bove said that whoever ends up buying Wilmington Trust would have to “have faith” that the financials were accurate and that “it’s a crap shoot” for anyone to consider Wilmington.
Andy Stapp, senior analyst at B. Riley and Co. seemed to have a more optimistic view on Wilmington Trust (WL) saying that only a minority interest was likely to be sold at around $9 to $11 per share. Despite his belief that Wilmington Trust could possibly sell at a premium of 13%-39% above the market price, Stapp did hold off issuing a buy recommendation of the stock until the November 1st earnings release.
On October 25, 2010, in an article titled “Wilmington Trust Stock Slides,” TheStreet.com discussed the prospects of Wilmington Trust (WL). According to Janney Montgomery Scott analyst Stephen Moss, Wilmington Trust could be acquired for $8 per share but would not be surprised if the company sold for “substantially less.”
On November 1, 2010, it was announced the M&T Bank (MTB) would acquire Wilmington Trust for $3.84 per share, a discount of 46% below the closing price of October 29, 2010. According to a ThomsonReuters news article titled “M&T Bank Snaps Up Bargain-priced Wilmington” the shares of Wilmington Trust were being bought based on the tangible book value of the company at the end of September 2010. Almost overnight, the price of Wilmington Trust (WL) was cut in half.
Final Observations:
  • Bove was right, WL was a crap shoot at $7.79
  • Stapp was wrong, WL was not nearly worth $9
  • Tangible book value is a good starting point for research
  • Always be prepared for the market price of a stock to be cut in half

Please revisit New Low Observer for edits and revisions to this post. Email us.